Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[TinselKoala]

The PP caps will act like snubbers. A little series resistance is good for dissipating the energy.  If you want to avoid rewinding coils then using capacitors or TVS devices to limit the voltage build-up during the flyback is wise.  But because it does redirect energy, depending on the goals of your build, they might be seen as self-defeating. 

Experimenting is very limited without a scope.  Normally for a budget, I would recommend a Hantek USB DSO.  $170. or so buys a two channel 50MHz w/ external triggering.  But if you fancy playing with narrow high voltage spikes, an analog scope will show you a more accurate picture, because analog scopes are not hamstrung by an 8 bit A/D.  A 2213A like TK uses or any other 20MHz to 100MHz analog scope can be had in decent shape on eBay for $50. - $150.  The shipping tends to be dear because of the bulk and weight.

I agree 100 percent. If you snub your voltage then you can't use it externally, and of course the original claims of EMJunkie do not contain any such circuitry.

The Tek 2213a and similar scopes are actually very light in weight as they do not use heavy transformers in the power supply. Mine is buried under a stack of other stuff so I can't get it out to give an exact weight but it is surprisingly light, compared to my other analog scopes. As people can see from my demonstrations, I use it a lot because it is _so easy_ to operate. It only takes a few seconds to set it up for measurements, its delayed trigger timebase capability is excellent (although not as nice as the old HP180a's) and it has respectable 60 MHz bandwidth which is adequate for most of the projects on forums like this one,  and a nice clean trace. It was also easy to repair the one time something did go wrong with it (blown input FET causing unadjustable DC offset in the channel). Service manuals are available online for all this old Tektronix equipment.

The lathe has been called the King of Tools. The oscilloscope is truly the "king of test equipment" and any experimenter with electronic circuits should have one. Almost any scope is better than none at all, but don't waste money on a single-channel scope or one with under 20MHz bandwidth.  The Function Generator is the next most important instrument on the workbench IMHO. Any serious electronic bench must include these two instruments, along with the usual multimeters and power supplies, etc.

[Brian516]

I agree 100 percent. If you snub your voltage then you can't use it externally, and of course the original claims of EMJunkie do not contain any such circuitry.

The Tek 2213a and similar scopes are actually very light in weight as they do not use heavy transformers in the power supply. Mine is buried under a stack of other stuff so I can't get it out to give an exact weight but it is surprisingly light, compared to my other analog scopes. As people can see from my demonstrations, I use it a lot because it is _so easy_ to operate. It only takes a few seconds to set it up for measurements, its delayed trigger timebase capability is excellent (although not as nice as the old HP180a's) and it has respectable 60 MHz bandwidth which is adequate for most of the projects on forums like this one,  and a nice clean trace. It was also easy to repair the one time something did go wrong with it (blown input FET causing unadjustable DC offset in the channel). Service manuals are available online for all this old Tektronix equipment.

The lathe has been called the King of Tools. The oscilloscope is truly the "king of test equipment" and any experimenter with electronic circuits should have one. Almost any scope is better than none at all, but don't waste money on a single-channel scope or one with under 20MHz bandwidth.  The Function Generator is the next most important instrument on the workbench IMHO. Any serious electronic bench must include these two instruments, along with the usual multimeters and power supplies, etc.

I will remove the PP caps for any further experimenting with the device.  I am still learning about how everything works and am nowhere near as knowledgeable as you are.   I am starting to gather the necessary equipment, I'm just doing so at a slower pace so I don't buy something and then find something equivalent for less.  I am most likely going to be getting this Tek 465, since all the guy wants is some ammo for it and I won't have to spend any cash, other than gas to go get it.  I'm not sure what I'll be able to use the oscillator for yet, but I'm sure at some point it will come in handy, especially since it's an old tube-driven oscillator. My next investment will be a FG and variable DC power supply, then a variac, but for now, I will use my PC and stereo, then my Arduino when I learn how to use it properly. I don't go diving into equipment without first learning how to properly use it, so I don't go blowing it up before I get any real use out of it.

Sorry if I've wasted anyone's time with my uneducated babbling.

Regards, Brian.

[stivep]

From Wesley:
I'm here on this topic just because of your comment, It was you who mentioned me TinselKoala.
It is you who made me to respond.
So it is you who should be blamed for your own disappointment including content of my response .
there would be no me, and no oversize pictures,( sorry for that) - if it  was not you TinselKoala  waking  me up.
There would not be even this comment if it was not you triggering it.

Do you seriously think that people posting on this forum can experiment with radioisotopes using equipment like you have shown in your OVERSIZE images?

Most of them not, but some of them will.- I'm the example of - some of them
At the end there is one thing important:
WORKS OR NOT.?
Was the secret given out or not?

[/size]
You can protest about my comments with respect
to you and your role in the Akula-Ruslan farce all you like.

I just did.
However you  need to understand that I'm not  against you.
If you want to have topic dedicated  in given direction please do not make me to answer.

You now appear to be trying to distance yourself from being associated with them. Fine.

]
Dear TinselKoala:
People like Akula, Ruslan, Tariel Kapanadze, SR, and others are just for money.
That is nothing wrong in it.[
The major difference is origin  and reasoning of: why they did not give it  out .
They make videos to attract the public and attract potential buyers, investors.
I translate some of the videos and independently  make some evaluation.
Akula and Ruslan devices WORKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!( at the certain geographically tuned locations)( geo-dependency per tuned value)
Got it?
Get it?


I'm not a friend of anyone who is  stupid enough to think that there will be a big buyer fir their FE  Devices concept.
However I cooperate with them to get the info out.
Some of them are just disgusting, selfish SB.


-by that there is separation between them and me.


So again:The major difference is origin  and reasoning of: why they did not give it  out


-if one have device and wants money for it it is good for him, but  not as good for us.


-even if one have device and wants money for it it   but he understands that give it out does not make him lose money ,  because  buyer is everyone on the planet earth. than is good for him and good for us.


- if someone  is in fear of being prosecuted,  or killed, and still says something for us to know than this man is hero,
He could of sit quiet and use this energy without public exposure. However for many of them is to late. They are in public domain already and that public is their safety shelter  ( sort of slightly, faintly, remotely, vaguely )  And because there is no-one to help including you TinselKoala ,  we are in trap writing here, just to live the mark in hope.

The FACT remains that nobody credible has ever replicated their "self running" devices, and the two of them are most probably faking their demonstrations.
There is much evidence in support of this opinion of mine, and there is ZERO real evidence that they are telling the truth about their devices.

I do not care
I'm not much  of  a believer .
I sit on facts and my own evaluation.
Dear Friend try to understand I'm not for money , not for fame, not for benefits.However I'm not against of having  it.
The main point is I'm not for sale.

[/font]

The only thing preventing a proper and convincing evaluation of their devices is the attitude of NON-COOPERATION of the claimants. I see your role in this as one of collusion, whether you actually have lunch with them every day or not. Instead of using your contacts with them to provide a skeptical evaluation that could be trusted, you are promoting them and encouraging creative and smart people to waste their time and money and creativity chasing wild geese and trying to replicate fraudulent devices that do not work as Akula and Ruslan claim.

You right. Some of them are just opportunists that have been lucky to find the "diamond" Now they think what to do with it.
Some other people can waste their money, or in many occasion take  slightly different approach, and get in the place, the first  guy have never been yet.
at the end- Akula, Rusan are the people  who (are) were at first  wasting their own money  in it as well.
And yes you right the  greed is their motivation.But greed is the foundation of capitalism.

[/font]

If you yourself believe in them, why are you not spending YOUR time and money actually replicating their devices, which allegedly produce lots more "free energy" than your radioisotope work ever will? I know why... and so do you.

I can not do  two things at once:
- I have not enough time
- I have not enough money as Colman is very expensive  project.
- I have to much progress in Colman that  I can not think of starting  any other parallel investigation.
- That all does not make me ignorant to electrostatic or magnetic FE concepts. And that is why  I post some of my videos.

[/font] All posters of images: PLEASE have some courtesy and do not post images that are more than 1024 pixels wide! The reason for this size limitation should be perfectly obvious to everyone by now. There are any number of software packages that you can use to scale down your images, and if you need to provide a close up, then just crop it out of the larger image and blow it up, but keep the size below 1024 pixels wide! PLEASE !

Sorry for that it was not intentional. I had no idea that I will have such response to your comment
I do not want to take place  here  and disturb your topic . Please understand that as well.








Wesley

[TinselKoala]

I will remove the PP caps for any further experimenting with the device.  I am still learning about how everything works and am nowhere near as knowledgeable as you are.   I am starting to gather the necessary equipment, I'm just doing so at a slower pace so I don't buy something and then find something equivalent for less.  I am most likely going to be getting this Tek 465, since all the guy wants is some ammo for it and I won't have to spend any cash, other than gas to go get it.  I'm not sure what I'll be able to use the oscillator for yet, but I'm sure at some point it will come in handy, especially since it's an old tube-driven oscillator. My next investment will be a FG and variable DC power supply, then a variac, but for now, I will use my PC and stereo, then my Arduino when I learn how to use it properly. I don't go diving into equipment without first learning how to properly use it, so I don't go blowing it up before I get any real use out of it.

Sorry if I've wasted anyone's time with my uneducated babbling.

Regards, Brian.

You're doing fine! Not wasting time at all. Your parallel capacitors will make the coils into resonant tanks and this will be interesting to explore, it's just not the same as EMJ's circuits that he's posted (although he may have others that do use capacitors.)

Your Tek 465 is a truly _fine_ oscilloscope, a real classic and I wish I had one.  Here's a link you may find useful:

http://w140.com/tekwiki/wiki/465

I've got some experience with Arduinos and I'll be glad to answer questions and help with programming if I am able.

[TinselKoala]

@Stivep (Wesley)

From Wesley:
I'm here on this topic just because of your comment, It was you who mentioned me TinselKoala.
It is you who made me to respond.
So it is you who should be blamed for your own disappointment including content of my response .
there would be no me, and no oversize pictures,( sorry for that) - if it  was not you TinselKoala  waking  me up.
There would not be even this comment if it was not you triggering it.

Actually my comments mentioning you were themselves triggered by someone else  in this thread mentioning Akula, Ruslan and Wesley as showing genuine devices, I believe, so I gave my opinion of that situation.

You still are claiming that their devices Work but depend on geographic tuning. I reject this hypothesis as it is made without supporting evidence, other than that nobody in other locations has made them work (duh) , but I will point out that Ruslan is an engineer or something similar at a commercial FM broadcast station that puts a large amount of power into space from its transmitter system. So it is _perhaps_ plausible that some of his devices are indeed geographically dependent: They work in his transmitter room or near his transmitting antenna! Still, this is much less likely than simply faking by inserting batteries in capacitor cans or using hidden wires.

Did you see my replication of one of Akula's small devices, where I am able to make the _exact_ scope waveforms, and show a few seconds runtime using a supercapacitor? How do you account for the fact that an electronic device can make the exact waveforms as another one, but not operate in exactly the same way (self running) ? Geographical tuning? This is another hypothesis without evidence. You might as well say that it works because the gremlins in Texas are a different species than the gremlins in Lithuania.

The big image problem is one that is continually frustrating to me and other readers of this forum. Stefan (our host) used to have a statement that images should be no more than 1024 pixels wide down where the "allowed file attachments" list is found, but since the new update of the forum, this statement isn't there any more. However, as you can see, it makes the text comments hard to read because you have to scroll over the maximum page width to read them. So whenever I see such wide images I remind people not to post them so wide! It also takes longer to load huge images.

In my next post I'll be uploading some on-topic 1024 pixel wide images, and you'll see that they fit nicely on the normal page width of the forum. Wider will cause a horizontal scroll bar to appear on most screens and will extend text in comments beyond the borders so that scrolling is needed to read it.