Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[synchro1]

The BS claim is that the currents travel in opposing directions through the same conductor.  It is utter nonsense.  If there were currents they would be circulating in the direction of the magnetizing coils around the legs, and they would be travelling in one direction in order to support the magnetization which is in one direction around the metal loop.

@MarkE,

Talk is cheap! Your theory is the BS theory, and Russ proved it.

[MarkE]

@MarkE,

Another "Know it all" quote from MarkE:

"Measuring remnant magnetization is a typical second semester physics lab in any university".

That other quote above about "Magnetic Currents" is from Ed Leedskalnin. Ed not only invented the PMH, but published a small book on the subject called "Magnetic Currents" too. There's no detecatable "Remnant Magnetization" of any kind in Russ's PMH nuts after the locking event.

Unless he claimed to be a time traveler to 50 years before he was born, he did not invent an effect that has been known since the mid 1800's.  The act of opening the reluctance gap effectively increases the magnetic path length by thousands of times dropping the remanent magnetization to essentially zero.  The remanent magnetization while the device is closed can be detected through the coils, as well as the force that it takes to open the reluctance gap.

Russ does measurements with a sensitive "Gauss Meter" in this video: Russ fails to detect any "Remnant Magnetic Field".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhiAIsJCS9Y

Perhaps it would help to familiarize yourself with Ed's theories before supplanting them with another set of your own home brewed "Bogus theories".

Perhaps you might take some physics.

[synchro1]

What would happen if a second set of nuts were added to Russ's wire loop? Would the same pulse lock the second set of nuts along with the first with the same input? Imagine a ring of multipal nut sets composed of "Piezo Material" around the same wire loop!

The first test would involve the locking effect on one and two sets of nuts from a capacitive discharge of known Joules.

[MarkE]

What would happen if a second set of nuts were added to Russ's wire loop? Would the same pulse lock the second set of nuts along with the first with the same input? Imagine a ring of multipal nut sets composed of "Piezo Material" around the same wire loop!

The first test would involve the locking effect on one and two sets of nuts from a capacitive discharge of known Joules.

The flux density moving away from the wire gets weaker due to distance and the shielding effect of the first set of nuts.  It will be much harder to get a second outer ring of nuts to hold together.

Piezo electric effect is a voltage <=> mechanical stress phenomenon.  There is little voltage, and little mechanical stress in this set-up.

[synchro1]

The flux density moving away from the wire gets weaker due to distance and the shielding effect of the first set of nuts.  It will be much harder to get a second outer ring of nuts to hold together.

Piezo electric effect is a voltage <=> mechanical stress phenomenon.  There is little voltage, and little mechanical stress in this set-up.

@MarkE,

I said nothing about an "outer ring" of nuts. Imagine a string of beads. Your flux density theory is completely worthless to explain the PMH effect.

The "Impulse Magnetization" effect that's an industrial standard, is an OU effect when the input is measured against the force the permanent magnet exerts over it's life span.

The pressure of the locked nuts generates measurable heat. Doubling the heat in a second set of nuts, with the same joule pulse, would tear a hole through the second law of thermo-dynamics.   

Russ has the nuts placed on a board with a hole through it. A second board with a hole and a set of nuts like the first, one over the other, with the wire threaded through both holes, would result in the correct test configuration.