Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[MarkE]

@TK and all following,

I am going to try to do something nice, I am going to ask nicely, try to be pleasant and to the point...

    1: Induction in a singular coil, where another coil is the prime mover, induces a Current in the opposing Direction to the Prime Mover.
        This is seen mathematically as: emf = -dPhi/dt = Lenzs Law

    2: A second Output Coil introduced, Induction in this second Coil is also the same:
        This is seen mathematically as: emf = -dPhi/dt = Lenzs Law

    3: Output Coils A and B are each 1 Volt emf. The direction or turns is such that there is an addition of Electric Field and Magnetic Fields (-)(Lenz's Law) Oppose.
        This is seen mathematically as: emf = 2-dPhi/dt = 1.

There is no negative sign here, A different type of Induction to our standard Induction with a (-) sign. Normally the Wire Impedance would inhibit Current Flow, even though we might have 300 turns or AWG 20 wire, the Current is not Inhibited because the Impedance is lowered by the Coil Configuration. Please think about this. Is this new? No its not! I am not the discoverer! I have merely re-discovered these principals and I am trying to share this. Its Old Technology! The problem is that too many have turned a blind eye, brushed it off as rubbish and not even experimented or thought about this in any detail.

Soon we will have to look at these things. Or the dark ages will ensue again.

   Chris

You have in all the time of having previously claimed to have realized a working device failed:

1) To show any measurements or demonstration that you have a working device.
2) To describe any device that when replicated by capable builders yields the free energy you claim.
3) To show that you understand how to make competent measurements using standard test equipment.
4) To show that any configuration you have proposed in any way does violate existing scientific understanding.
5) To show that any configuraiton you have proposed in any way could violate existing scientific understanding.

Bucking coils, what you call "partnered coils" have been components of low voltage transformers used in consumer products for decades and decades.  Bucking is used to avoid adding extra windings to handle line voltage trim.  I have already shown an example of such a transformer configuation used to support:  110V/120V/220V/240V operation.

12-1 does not equal remarkable.  Neither does 1-1 equal remarkable.

[EMJunkie]

You have in all the time of having previously claimed to have realized a working device failed:

1) To show any measurements or demonstration that you have a working device.
2) To describe any device that when replicated by capable builders yields the free energy you claim.
3) To show that you understand how to make competent measurements using standard test equipment.
4) To show that any configuration you have proposed in any way does violate existing scientific understanding.
5) To show that any configuraiton you have proposed in any way could violate existing scientific understanding.

Bucking coils, what you call "partnered coils" have been components of low voltage transformers used in consumer products for decades and decades.  Bucking is used to avoid adding extra windings to handle line voltage trim.  I have already shown an example of such a transformer configuation used to support:  110V/120V/220V/240V operation.

12-1 does not equal remarkable.  Neither does 1-1 equal remarkable.

MarkE - I have already shown all the concepts I need in my videos. None of these videos have been refuted. In-fact, many others out on the internet have replicated my work. Much of these replications are within the Russes Mother Land, where Fluoride is not putting minds to sleep, where Vaccinations are not sterilising people by the millions, where their own government does actually work for the people.

You have proven yourself to be a Goon many times, a smart person that can not think for himself.

MarkE, I am afraid it is too late for you, but I am ok with that, we all make educated decisions for ourselves, all I see is what I have said: "It seems that the Eyes are a sensory perception that is very much Censored by Perceptions"

Where your perceptions are from a Textbook that is written to blind and fragment reality.

Ever heard of "The Black Knight"? - How is it, that, 13,000 years ago, a bunch of people that were banging other people over the head with Rocks could launch something like this into Orbit? Or could it be that the very History Book you believe in, may not contain the correct information?

[MarkE]

MarkE - I have already shown all the concepts I need in my videos. None of these videos have been refuted. In-fact, many others out on the internet have replicated my work. Much of these replications are within the Russes Mother Land, where Fluoride is not putting minds to sleep, where Vaccinations are not sterilising people by the millions, where their own government does actually work for the people.

No you cannot point to any videos that actually support your claims.  You have not yourself shown a device that does as you claim.

You have proven yourself to be a Goon many times, a smart person that can not think for himself.

Here we go again:  Cornered you lash out with more ad hominem attacks.

MarkE, I am afraid it is too late for you, but I am ok with that, we all make educated decisions for ourselves, all I see is what I have said: "It seems that the Eyes are a sensory perception that is very much Censored by Perceptions"

Where your perceptions are from a Textbook that is written to blind and fragment reality.

Ever heard of "The Black Knight"? - How is it, that, 13,000 years ago, a bunch of people that were banging other people over the head with Rocks could launch something like this into Orbit? Or could it be that the very History Book you believe in, may not contain the correct information?

Evidence is what counts and you have none that supports your claims.  No quantity of ad hominem attacks can clear that deficit.

[allcanadian]

@Mark E

I argue for what verifiable facts show.  Where do you have verifiable facts that defy either Faraday or Lenz?  That's quite a trick seeing anything that isn't huge leave earths orbit.  Please tell me how you think that you managed to do that?

Myself and another witness saw that the whole body of a smaller second craft which came from a first very large one was illuminated a dull orange color. There was no sound, no jet plume from a rocket nor was there a vapor trail. The smaller craft accelerated to an absurd speed made a wide 90 degree sweeping turn upwards and just accelerated almost straight out and away from the Earth as far as we could see.


This observation led me two believe either the craft had an energy source we cannot possibly imagine or somehow it had manipulated the property of inertia. I think you might agree that it takes a great deal of energy to accelerate a mass against the force of it's own inertia. Thus either the energy source was very great or the inertia was somehow very low.


As you can imagine I have tried to relate this observation to known phenomena, as you say, things we can prove however I cannot reconcile what we saw. I mean I have seen F-16's dog fighting at low level and breaking the sound barrier, I have seen a missile fired from close range accelerating over the horizon and I am familiar with more aircraft than most anyone I know...this was not what I saw. There is literally nothing I know of that can accelerate that fast or make that kind of super high G turn or leave the Earths atmosphere at that velocity, I meant to say earth's atmosphere in my last post.


So I am left to speculate that it must be using technology we cannot understand yet because according to the laws of physics I know no craft can do what we saw it do. Which raises the question, if it was not a conventional propulsion technology(no sound, plume or vapor trail) then what was it?. I would guess it must somehow relate to electrodynamics hence my comment regarding Faraday and Lenz law.


I guess the issue which is not uncommon is that the facts I know and have seen first hand are not the same one's you have seen and know. Such is life


AC

[Enjoykin]

Gennadiy Vasilevich Nikolaev - «Siberian Colia Experiments»
«Siberian Colia» is a Perfect Source of scalar magnetic field H* =  -divA

Опыт 1. Вращение вертикального магнита «Cибирский Коля»
Example 1. Rotation of Verticaly placed «Siberian Colia»

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hs94RpN9MyA

Опыт 2. Движение магнита «Cибирский Коля» вдоль поля
Motion of «Siberian Colia» along field of two permanent magnets.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZ1-4wSFkq0