Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[TinselKoala]

Hi Chris, 

" TK, youre an Idiot in all senses of the word!"    

Ok ,Lets test him ... the picture below.

I am just wondering, you said before it works better with the core.  Did you actually meant split core in the middle?

Thanks,

Peace,
PS: TK  take it easy

The first two lines of 1's are irrelevant as they do not form or participate in an equation. The third line is an equation and the answer depends on the order of operations. Normally in arithmetic multiplication takes precedence over addition but one could put in parentheses in the equation in various ways that would force different answers. PEMDAS, remember?  If you care to state the equation differently, including the parentheses that indicate the order of operations meant... then of course the "trick" of the question goes away and even EMjunkie might be able to solve it correctly.
Most good calculators have the PEMDAS order of operations rules built in.

[TinselKoala]

Hi John,

Results are in, TK is a Mind Control Subject, deliberately controlled to be a Stooge Troll Villainous Juvenile... No other Tests will be necessary to prove these facts...

Yes, my works shows a Core is best. I have had no luck with Air Cores.

A Split Core, yes Sometimes a split is needed, this depends on the Coil Configurations that one uses. The reason for this, simply is, in one configuration, if you Wind and connect the coils on one singular Core, then this results in a dead short of the coils.

A Split, or Gap does allow the Dead short condition to be removed or reduced. See Andrei Melenchenko's work for more verifiable evidence of this.

   Chris

Damn, TK you're a real Moron!!!

You cannot refute me, so once again you descend into silly insults. Insults which do nothing but reflect on your own lack of character. Your overunity claims are without support and you cannot provide any data which support them. Certainly, as we all know, you refer many times to known facts of transformer and coil behaviour and nobody denies those _known facts_. Your own FALSE CLAIMS about the systems you have kludged together are what are at issue here... claims that you cannot support with accurate measurements properly obtained with instruments properly used. You are a FALSE CLAIMANT, and a childish insulting bully to boot.

Anyone who really has what they claim in terms of OU can simply DEMONSTRATE IT, refuting me thusly. It has never happened yet, and it sure isn't going to happen coming from YOU. You've wasted years of your time and thousands of words of text, alienated many people, and you have nothing, zero, zip, nada (thanks Chet) to show for it except a box full of junk coils and an oscilloscope that you don't even know how to operate correctly. Give it up, FALSE CLAIMANT.

[TinselKoala]

That document is an EE101 fail.  Reactive power is not real power.

Indeed. In fact the circuit described in the document is merely a more complicated way to do just exactly what I show in this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xuXBHJcNsk

[EMJunkie]

That document is an EE101 fail.  Reactive power is not real power.

Indeed. In fact the circuit described in the document is merely a more complicated way to do just exactly what I show in this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xuXBHJcNsk

Well, I disagree!

Reactive Power, in reactive power state, ie; Current/Voltage out of phase by cos(phi) is not something that should be disregarded!

    First, this power can still do work, even though it is said that it cant. LC Resonance is a form of Reactive Power and the very Magnetic Field that the Inductor produces is Kinetic!

    Second, SERPS, can easily transform this Reactive Power back to Real Power.

And so, treating Reactive Power as if it is nothing, or useless is a falsity of the textbook. Not true.

[EMJunkie]

Well, I disagree!

Reactive Power, in reactive power state, ie; Current/Voltage out of phase by cos(phi) is not something that should be disregarded!

    First, this power can still do work, even though it is said that it cant. LC Resonance is a form of Reactive Power and the very Magnetic Field that the Inductor produces is Kinetic!

    Second, SERPS, can easily transform this Reactive Power back to Real Power.

And so, treating Reactive Power as if it is nothing, or useless is a falsity of the textbook. Not true.

I would also like to point out, for those that don't already know, SERPS, can in some cases incorporate my work into the Operational Characteristics of its Circuit, if one were to look up the Centre Tapped Transformer.... Certainly some of the devices that Jim Murray has built do use exactly the same Tech I am using...  E.G: Motors speeding up under load, speeding up so much they become uncontrollable...

   Chris