Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[MarkE]

one more quick one:

In a standard Conventional Transformer, the interactions between the coils do what?


Answer = _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _?

Exhibit mutual inductance.

In an Antenna, signals received do what:

Answer = _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _? unless there is an _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ mismatch!

Couple incident energy even if there is an impedance mismatch.

Why?

By reflecting incident energy.

How can "Partnered Output Coils" Interact:

Answer = _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _!

"Partnered output coils" are simply coils with mutual inductance wired such that they buck.

Back to work for me now - TTFN!

[EMJunkie]

Exhibit mutual inductance.Couple incident energy even if there is an impedance mismatch.By reflecting incident energy."Partnered output coils" are simply coils with mutual inductance wired such that they buck.

MarkE - the most useful post you have ever posted!

Last one not quite right:

"Partnered output coils" are simply coils with mutual inductance wired such that they buck.

But I think 99% of the masses know what the answer is there!

If the directions of the two signals are such that opposite H-fields cancel and E-fields add, an apparently steady E-field will be created. The energy density of the fields remain as calculated above, but the value of the E-field will double from E/2 to E.

The BIGGEST Problem that you (People that don't yet get this) is that Conventionally, BUCKING means no Electric Field on the Output, which is the Conventional idea behind the term Bucking - That's why I don't use the Term!!!

This thinking (Bucking) is Wrong! Period! - Fields Oppose for a totally different reason! I have already explained why - Lenz's Law, Flow of Current. E.G: Magnetic Field.


You HAVE to stop thinking "Driving the Coils with Current" - Think Induction! An EMF is Induced.... Not Wired to "BUCK", the Coils oppose because of Lenz's Law... Wired to Add Electrically, but the Magnetic Fields Oppose...

[MarkE]

MarkE - the most useful post you have ever posted!

last one not quite right!

But I think 99% of the masses know what the answer is there!


The BIGGEST Problem that you (People that don't yet get this) is that Conventionally, BUCKING means no Electric Field on the Output, which is the Conventional idea behind the term Bucking - That's why I don't use the Term!!!

This thinking (Bucking) is Wrong! Period! - Fields Oppose for a totally different reason! I have already explained why - Lenz's Law, Flow of Current. E.G: Magnetic Field.

You are unable to demonstrate your claims.  Replications of your confiigurations confirm conventional theory and refute your claims.

[Pirate88179]

Hahahaha - First, to see, one must have eyes....

Second, TK and Itsu (I respect Itsu) built a circuit, but did not succeed! It is as simple as that! They both built Circuits Expecting it to fail before starting. Both did not follow proper instructions, and circuit suggestions.

Third - Simple things must be understood before just going into a build - I have said this right from the start!!!!!!!!!!

If you don't understand the basics, then it cannot work! Period!

But hey, you blokes, Guru's, keep pounding the pavement for answers....

I have them, my Team of excellent people have them!

You could have them too, if you shut your yabbering and listened, stop thinking you know better... but you cant!

This response, in no way, even comes close to answering Chet's simple question.

Are you saying that the only thing wrong with TK's replication was that he did not believe in it when he built it?
So, TK had all of the electronics correct, and all of the coils, components, circuit and everything else was as it should be...but it did not work because he did not believe?

If this is not what you are saying, even though it really sounds like you are, then please answer Chet's question and tell all of us the mistakes that TK and Itsu made on their replications of your device.

I agree with Mark that both replications worked as well as yours...meaning they did not work.

Let's see if you can answer Chet's simple question.

Bill

PS  We are waiting...

[EMJunkie]

You are unable to demonstrate your claims.  Replications of your confiigurations confirm conventional theory and refute your claims.

No - Un-Willing, not Un-Able - Why: Trolls and Demo's don't mix!

My claims are - If you don't learn this very simple concept, then you're stuffed for eternity!