Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[MarkE]

http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/hoopmnst.htm   

It is a failure to compute vector math correctly.

[MileHigh]

There is just no way that anyone can put forth a proposition that states, "I found a way to generate EMF in a loop with zero net changing flux with respect to time going through the loop."  It's just complete and utter nonsense. It's actually an insult to all of us.   JLN has left this legacy of misfires and should be ashamed of himself.

This is where you have to use your knowledge and wits to separate the BS from the real world.  It's just like that new buoyancy pitch.  There is just no way in hell to get free energy from a vertical column of water with inflated balloons generating lift on a chain drive.  Just ask James Kwok or Wayne's brain.

Learn to use your knowledge and wits and gut feel to rout out the BS before we all drown in it.

[tinman]

How is it that you can say this with a straight face when you don't even understand the conventional perception of the magnetic field?

It is exactly like when someone claims that conventional electronics knowledge is wrong, yet, they do not even know the basics of electronics.  These statements would have a lot more credibility if someone who knew and understood the conventional, proven, laws said them.  When it comes from a newbie, then...not so much.

Bill

Bill
It's hard to repute or reject others claims about magnetic fields when science it self dosnt even know what a magnetic field is. Once again-we know what it can do, and we know how to use it to make devices work based around it-but we dont know what it is.

I still say it is a field of positive and negative charges. Like charges repell, unlike charges attract. There are those here that say rubbish, even though they have no explanation them self.

[Pirate88179]

Bill
It's hard to repute or reject others claims about magnetic fields when science it self dosnt even know what a magnetic field is. Once again-we know what it can do, and we know how to use it to make devices work based around it-but we dont know what it is.

I still say it is a field of positive and negative charges. Like charges repell, unlike charges attract. There are those here that say rubbish, even though they have no explanation them self.

Brad:

Sure, I agree with what you are saying but, one has to consider when some bloke says "science does not understand magnetics or the magnetic field."
yet, somehow, those guys that don't understand it make things like CRT's, flat screen tv's...etc.  The list of useful manipulations of magnetics is out there working for us every day.  It would be better if we understood 100% of the why, but the how is also important, and most of the folks making those comments don't understand the how at all.

Sorry, I am not making much sense here at the moment it appears, but I do get what you are saying and I am certainly not including you in the group I was referring to in my post.

I am still confounded by something I read here on a topic (I can not recall which) that said if the sun burned out and collapsed into nothing, it would take nine minutes for us here on earth to see the light disappear due to speed of light/distance.  However, they said that the earth would immediately fly out of the influence of the sun's gravity (as would the other planets in the solar system) and this would not take 9 minutes or even 1 second.

So, this either means gravity travels faster than light, or (and I am leaning toward this one) gravity is like a chain with links that are always there.  Remove a link and the influence goes away instantaneously and does not have to allow for time to travel any distance.  Hawking, and others, claim gravity is a particle of mass (graviton) so ...more mass more gravitons.  Fine, (This agrees with Newton) but how are they linked across space like a chain?  Otherwise, gravitons travel waaay faster than light which I do not believe.

Still trying to get my head around this one.

Bill 

[minnie]

  Tinman,
           give this a go. "New revolutions in particle physics:Basic concepts."
Lecture one, Leonard  Susskind, Stanford. Youtube.
           J.