Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

Started by EMJunkie, January 16, 2015, 12:08:38 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 101 Guests are viewing this topic.

picowatt

Quote from: Groundloop on July 17, 2015, 01:43:59 PM
I have decided to open source the attached circuit because I think it is relevant
to the discussion in this thread. I have modified my old Figure-8 circuit with a
shorting coil on the output. My shorting coil is shorted by a transistor. The shorting
is 180 degrees out of faze with the input oscillator. I have not done any output
measurements on this circuit, and will probably never do. One thing is for sure,
the 3,5 Watt LED bulb on the output is very bright with only approx. 0,3 Watt input
to the circuit. Circuit runs on 3 Volt input.

GL.

GL,

Very interesting.  I particularly like how you implemented your coil shorting transistor.

Just out of curiosity, why will you not be posting any measurements?

PW


 

Void

MarkE, I did not say TK was taking anything on blind faith. TK has not replied yet, (unless I missed it) in regards
to what his reason is for saying he knows that Tinman's setup can't be supplying more power out than is being input.
I said you are expressing blind faith when you said words to the effect that you know we can't ever get more power output
to a load than is being supplied from the power source because of the principle of conservation of energy.
For all we know here at this point, if Tinman's setup is really supplying more power to the load than is being drawn from the
battery, then Tinman's setup may possibly be drawing in the exces energy from somewhere else in some form or way that
we don't understand. That is at least a possibility. There would be no violation of conservation of energy in such a case, so
going on about the violation of the conservation of energy would just not be relevant in such a case. Since you have continued
on with your distortions and insults, etc., I will not respond further to you on this. I'm not really interested in having a discussion
with someone who carries on in such a way over someone simply asking someone else what their reason is for concluding something. ;)


Void

Quote from: picowatt on July 17, 2015, 01:56:45 PM
Just out of curiosity, why will you not be posting any measurements?

Maybe because he wants to avoid having certain people start jumping all over him and insulting him
if the measurements show anything out of the ordinary.  ;)


Spilled Fluids

Quote from: Void on July 17, 2015, 02:09:56 PM
Maybe because he wants to avoid having certain people start jumping all over him and insulting him
if the measurements show anything out of the ordinary.  ;)

That is a distinct possibility but so is not wanting to find out that he has made measurement errors or incorrect assumptions.
If it were me; I would want to know definitively what those measurements were.
I would not be afraid of the results either way nor would I be concerned if people wanted to challenge those measurements. That is how proper scientific experimentation works.

MarkE

Quote from: Void on July 17, 2015, 02:07:19 PM
MarkE, I did not say TK was taking anything on blind faith. TK has not replied yet, (unless I missed it) in regards
to what his reason is for saying he knows that Tinman's setup can't be supplying more power out than is being input.
I said you are expressing blind faith when you said words to the effect that you know we can't ever get more power output
to a load than is being supplied from the power source because of the principle of conservation of energy.
Do you understand the First Law of Energy?  You write as though you do not.
Quote
For all we know here at this point, if Tinman's setup is really supplying more power to the load than is being drawn from the
battery, then Tinman's setup may possibly be drawing in the exces energy from somewhere else in some form or way that
we don't understand.
That is not what is represented.  If such were true it would be consistent with TK's position.
QuoteThat is at least a possibility. There would be no violation of conservation of energy in such a case, so
going on about the violation of the conservation of energy would just not be relevant in such a case.
It seems you have lost yourself or just wish to argue straw men.
QuoteSince you have continued
on with your distortions and insults, etc., I will not respond further to you on this. I'm not really interested in having a discussion
with someone who carries on in such a way over someone simply asking someone else what there reason for concluding something. ;)
Do as you like.
Quote