Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[gotoluc]

Here is another test but now also adding a diode across the primary coil like I was doing some years back.

Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2DOqLZVosk

Luc

[EMJunkie]

Where do we start? well I'm not preaching anything, that's a good start to being with. Second I did not say I agree with Harold Aspden, only you disagree with him and so I stated that you should quantify this by doing the experiment.


I'm nearly 65yrs old, a bit long in the tooth, and by your statement of  4500hrs on a bench, I'm sure I could beat that just on my work with Marconi in Chelmsford. But that is not important, the thing that is important is you put things down without you proving otherwise, so the onus is on you, not me as you try to switch it, very clever.


A video will cut it as you put it, and of course ALL the data, I'm sure you don't think I'm stupid, or do you? data is everything, without it you can prove nothing, even you.

I will watch this thread with interest, but I will not enter into the realms of bad maners which seems the norm on this site


I'm going to say sorry to you because I have had a bad day, and you were the first to make my blood boil and you just had to have a little of my anger. I do not know who you are and really I could not care less, just don't be too quick to put people down, it just might back fire on you one of these days.


I'm gone, and oh, I will not be doing that experiment, been there, done that and have the tee shirt as they say


with regards


Mike

Nicely worded Mike!

There is always one, here, today there is three, would be nice if they just disagreed and left... Like they have been asked to on many many occasions!!!

It wont happen however...

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

Here is another test but now also adding a diode across the primary coil like I was doing some years back.

Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2DOqLZVosk

Luc

Thanks for the Videos Luc!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

Hi Junkie!
stupid not discussed.
it is let it be wont here


Do you understand?

Hi Idegen - No, not really. Sorry. Live and Let Live? That what you meant?

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

No-not when you include motion of the core that carries those magnetic fields. Both the primary and secondary form opposite field's,and thus there is no CEMF(no back torque) from the secondary field,as the secondaries current flow is not apposing that of the primaries current flow(hint).

Many here pride them selves in knowing so much about magnetic fields,but no one to date has been able to explain how the torque in the basic RT doubles when the stator coil has a load placed across it.Nor can any of these people tell you what the magnetic force is. The RT is both a generator that shows the opposite to that of any other generator,and it is also an extremely efficient electric motor. I have carried out careful measurement tests between the RT and !off the shelf! electric motors,and the RT has shown an efficiency of over 60% of that of any other motor i have tested against it driving the same load.

People are lazy. What they want is all your years of hard work and experimenting handed to them so as they can replicate your device. They are not interested in working out how it works,or why it's doing what it's doing,they just want a device that works in front of them,on the bench,where all the hard work was done by some one else. Many have replicated the effect of the basic RT,but none of them can explain as to how it is doing it,or what it is doing.

Here is a little project for any one interested-->more of a challenge really. An if you succeed, you will start to understand how wrong we have been doing thing's,and how induction must take place as presented to us for the last 200 years in order to create current flow through a conductor.

You are to build two identical inductors.Lets say they use an iron,laminated steel,or a ferrite core of size 10 to 20mm diameter x 30 to 50mm in length. On this core you wind say 300 turns of .55 or .61mm wire(enameled copper wire). You hang these two inductors from strings,so as they have a gap of say 5mm between them,and they can swing toward or away from each other(core coil face to face). You now use one as a primary,and the other as a secondary.

Your mission now is to send a current through the primary so as you can induce a current in the secondary. The secondary will have say a 10ohm resistor as a load across it. The aim is to get those two inductors to attract each other in stead of repelling each other when current is flowing through both coils without the use of PM's. So,in stead of producing a field in the secondary that apposes that of the primary,you must produce a field in the secondary that attracts the field produced by the primary. You must also show no increase in P/in to the primary when the load is placed on the secondary.

Who here can do that?.


P.S-that should be reflection-not reflecton in the schematic.

Brad, only one or two Plonkers question your RT, most here are in awe of your work and would like you to share more about it. Its always one or two that ruin it for the rest, always! Yes you know who you are!!!

"no one to date has been able to explain how the torque in the basic RT doubles when the stator coil has a load placed across it" - Remembering that the RT is your invention, none here are familiar with your RT other than a few videos that were posted. None here are qualified to make judgement on your RT at all. But some will try... Yes you know who you are!!!

There is some differences between Textbook Magnetism and what can be seen on the bench. This is undisputable. Generally, Textbook Magnetism is correct, it's just incomplete in my opinion.

Don't let a few dufus's get at you! Most here are with you, on a very enjoyable ride into the future! If we have to leave a few behind, then so be it!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org