Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[picowatt]

Smudge,

Early on I had requested that TM take a capacitance measurement between the inner secondary and the outer core but I don't recall if he did that.

TM if you are watching this, would you take this measurement and report your findings please. I would also encourage you to continue with this project on this forum as it does exhibit unique characteristics. You deserve credit for your device and I fear that someone lurking this thread without the best intentions could hijack your discovery.

Regarding the idea that properly utilized passive components could create negative resistance, I truly believe this is possible.

partzman

Partzman,

From Tinman's post #5702:

Inductance
Primary and outer secondary-=29.8mH
Inner secondary= 93.2mH

Resistance
Primary and outer secondary=1.6 ohms
Inner secondary=.7 ohms

Capacitance between windings
Between primary and outer secondary= .68nF
Between primary and inner secondary= .31nF
Between outer and inner secondary= .31nF

I do not recall seeing any other capacitance measurements such as between the windings and an actual core.

The meter specs do not state what test frequency is used for inductance.

PW

[partzman]

Partzman,

From Tinman's post #5702:
I do not recall seeing any other capacitance measurements such as between the windings and an actual core.

The meter specs do not state what test frequency is used for inductance.

PW

PW,

Thanks for finding that post.  One might logically assume from his measurements that the approximate inner winding to outer core capacitance would be 2x the inner to outer winding capacitance since they are is series with the core. If so, this would result in ~.62 nfd.

partzman

[partzman]

IMO, the way the world situation is shaping up, we have little time left to provide any help from the energy arena.  I figure at the rate we're going we'll run out of time so, this post is meant to stir things up a bit!

I believe that TM's device is capable (from what I've seen) of producing OU with proper configuration. I believe this from my own experience of which I'm willing to share certain info.

I've attached a paper which demonstrates passive OU from a simple device. It is certainly not an answer in itself but hopefully will serve to widen some horizons.

When reading the Math channel results, convert the mvv readings to mw.

partzman 

[MileHigh]

So, MH, you are saying that it is not a free expression forum then,, but rather it will only be discussed with certain terms and ideology's,,

I will tell you,, when you coerce someone trying to be creative into things that they are not comfortable with, or like even,, they loose interest in sharing things.

I fail most of the time and that is not a deterrent to me to keep on keeping on,, I think there are many just like me.

If we continue to look at things and doing things in the same way we always have,, what will we have?  nothing more than the same old same old,, nothing new.

No, you aren't going to play straw man with my words, you know exactly what I am saying.  Whose terms and whose ideologies and who wants only one voice heard?  Go look in the mirror because I am not stopping Brad from saying his piece but you object to me saying my piece.  That makes you the bad buy.

[shylo]

I just wish I could have seen how it worked with load on the secondaries.
Or with only the inner 2nd loaded.
I would like to understand why different frequency can change things.
It's similar to tuning a guitar, If you can maintain resonance  , is that where the answer is?
I think the field just gets compressed as it gets forced down into the smaller core.
Makes it stronger , therefore higher voltage, but less current???
artv