Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[tinman]

Tinman,

The purpose of this test was to get an accurate picture of the FG's power contribution while your circuit was producing "negative resistance".  I would trust the FG's 50R as being relatively low inductance.

Also, as suggested, I would perform some single cycle burst testing.  I suspect that such a test you will allow you to see a lightly damped waveform that rings down over time.   

PW

Ok PW.this is what i did.

In the first scope shot,the .9 ohm(value read on DMM) CVR is directly placed at the output jack of the FG. The blue channel is between the jack and CVR,and the yellow channel is after the CVR. From the CVR back into the lead,and to the HTT.

In the second scope shot,the CVR is now back at the HTT input terminal,and the FG's lead now plugged back into the FG. As before,the blue trace is before the CVR,and the yellow trace is after the CVR. The only thing i noticed that was slightly different was there was a voltage increase either side of the CVR when the lead was plugged back into the FG's output jack,so as the FG's lead is before the CVR(second scope shot). I am not sure why there was a slight voltage increase either side of the CVR with the CVR after the FG's lead to that of when the CVR was before the FG's lead ?.

Brad

[picowatt]

Ok PW.this is what i did.

In the first scope shot,the .9 ohm(value read on DMM) CVR is directly placed at the output jack of the FG. The blue channel is between the jack and CVR,and the yellow channel is after the CVR. From the CVR back into the lead,and to the HTT.

In the second scope shot,the CVR is now back at the HTT input terminal,and the FG's lead now plugged back into the FG. As before,the blue trace is before the CVR,and the yellow trace is after the CVR. The only thing i noticed that was slightly different was there was a voltage increase either side of the CVR when the lead was plugged back into the FG's output jack,so as the FG's lead is before the CVR(second scope shot). I am not sure why there was a slight voltage increase either side of the CVR with the CVR after the FG's lead to that of when the CVR was before the FG's lead ?.

Brad

Tinman,

I see you labeled these scope captures "PW test".

These are actually "MH tests"...

PW

[tinman]

Tinman,

I see you labeled these scope captures "PW test".

These are actually "MH tests"...

PW

Thats it
Was it not you that first wanted to see the outcome of putting the CVR at the FG's output connector ?.
I did this,and then followed it up by showing it(the CVR) after the FGs leads-a side by side comparison.
All this, and all you have to say is that i put the wrong initials on the scope shots

[tinman]

Tinman,

I see you labeled these scope captures "PW test".

These are actually "MH tests"...

PW

Fixed.

[picowatt]

Thats it
Was it not you that first wanted to see the outcome of putting the CVR at the FG's output connector ?.
I did this,and then followed it up by showing it(the CVR) after the FGs leads-a side by side comparison.
All this, and all you have to say is that i put the wrong initials on the scope shots

Tinman,

No, it was not.  I suggested measuring the FG's open circuit and loaded output voltage (while your circuit was connected and performing as desired).

As per your earlier complaints about us not being clear on what and how to measure, I posted a rather detailed description of exactly how to go about making those FG output measurements.  If I was unclear regarding that, please let me know.

Otherwise, no worries...

PW