Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[citfta]

Yes the WOW was  because you hit it exactly right.  It is amazing so many people insist on blindly looking for a better source or way of getting power.  I compare it to a person who has decided to go searching for unexplored areas of the earth.  Bu they never learn to read a map or use a compass or even study to learn what areas have already been thoroughly explored.  But somehow they think they will be able to find an unexplored area.  How would they even recognize it if they accidentally found it?

Regards,
Carroll

[EMJunkie]

Yes the WOW was  because you hit it exactly right.  It is amazing so many people insist on blindly looking for a better source or way of getting power.  I compare it to a person who has decided to go searching for unexplored areas of the earth.  Bu they never learn to read a map or use a compass or even study to learn what areas have already been thoroughly explored.  But somehow they think they will be able to find an unexplored area.  How would they even recognize it if they accidentally found it?

Regards,
Carroll

Hi Carroll - I could not agree more!!!

This is perhaps the most important "First Step" that anyone new to this field, or anyone in this field does not already know, really needs to take!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

I must admit, I am frighteningly disturbed at the overall lack of understanding, on the part of Breakthrough Energy Researchers, in general, on How Electrical Energy is currently "Generated"

Surely this understanding would have to be a prerequisite to being a Breakthrough Energy Researcher!!!

Is it just laziness? Is it that there has been no thought put into this research? Is it that there has been so much VooDoo Science surrounding this subject of Electrical Energy "Generation" for so long?

I am going to be straight up, if you don't know how Electrical Energy is "Generated" Conventionally, in every Electrical "Generator" on the Planet, then you're wasting your time here and everyone else's also!!!

Like I said: Reply #277 page No# 19


Electrical Energy 101 - Faradays Law of Induction - Part 1
Electrical Energy 101 - Faradays Law of Induction - Part 2

With hours of supporting documentation in THIS POST HERE


So many here are searching Blindly - Open your Eyes, Look for what it is that you want.


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

For All Interested, I have done a third video detailing some of the key points, on where Electrical Energy comes from:

Electrical Energy 101 - Faradays Law of Induction - Part 1
Electrical Energy 101 - Faradays Law of Induction - Part 2
NEW: Electrical Energy 101 - Faradays Law of Induction - Part 3

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[marathonman]

I really am impressed with your work Cris. you are one of the reasons i have gotten into Free energy but !

E= MC Squared is wrong and has been PROVEN wrong by at least 10 to 15 people.

Einstein created Nothing, Einstein built Nothing, Einstein was paid by J P Morgan to decimate Scientific advancement as was Heaviside and Lorentz.

Mass has NOTHING to do with Electromotive force. their is no energy in mass except from the enviroment.

Magnetism is the byproduct of Electricity not the other way around.

our entire Universe is Electric and causes Magnetism.

Love your work, thank you.

[EMJunkie]

I really am impressed with your work Cris. you are one of the reasons i have gotten into Free energy but !

E= MC Squared is wrong and has been PROVEN wrong by at least 10 to 15 people.

Einstein created Nothing, Einstein built Nothing, Einstein was paid by J P Morgan to decimate Scientific advancement as was Heaviside and Lorentz.

Mass has NOTHING to do with Electromotive force. their is no energy in mass except from the enviroment.

Magnetism is the byproduct of Electricity not the other way around.

our entire Universe is Electric and causes Magnetism.

Love your work, thank you.

Thanks for the kind words MarathonMan!

As awful as it is, the Nuclear Bomb was enough proof for me that: E = MC² is pretty solid in its form. Mass-Energy Equivalence states that mass is concentrated energy.

Mass–energy equivalence arose originally from special relativity as a paradox described by Henri Poincaré.[1] Einstein proposed it in 1905, in the paper Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy-content?, one of his Annus Mirabilis ("Miraculous Year") Papers.[2] Einstein was the first to propose that the equivalence of mass and energy is a general principle and a consequence of the symmetries of space and time.

A consequence of the mass–energy equivalence is that if a body is stationary, it still has some internal or intrinsic energy, called its rest energy. Rest mass and rest energy are equivalent and remain proportional to one another. When the body is in motion (relative to an observer), its total energy is greater than its rest energy. The rest mass (or rest energy) remains an important quantity in this case because it remains the same regardless of this motion, even for the extreme speeds or gravity considered in special and general relativity; thus it is also called the invariant mass.

Some more good reading on The Equivalence of Mass and Energy - Lets not forget, all matter in the universe that we know of at least, has the same basic form, Electron, Positron, and so on, which are supposed to be Fundamental Particles.

Although some may say that, E = MC² is proven to be In-Correct, there is a ton of hard Science that shows its pretty solid, that is, unless one chooses to split the Atom!!!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org