Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[seychelles]

well em the killshot is come just watch the precursor , but please let thE KIWI OUT OF THE BAG PLEASE..

[EMJunkie]

well em the killshot is come just watch the precursor , but please let thE KIWI OUT OF THE BAG PLEASE..

Seychells - I ask you, please just follow my videos, pdf and then ask questions.

It works as I have shown, I prommise you!

Self Assisted Oscillation in a Shorted Coil - Bucking Magnetic Field Oscillation
Partnered Output Coils - Why it's Important to have Current Flowing!

Guidelines to Bucking Coils

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

The sarcasm isn't necessary.  They aren't the same thing, you can believe what you want, I'll do the same.



The question was humble, honest and above all simple, I was expecting a simple honest response...... 


The post you made on the other thread with the chart was the motivating force behind my even reaching out to you.  Your posture is revealing, the vibe I get appalling, forgive my intrusion. 




Regards

Ok, appologies, if your question was genuine, then lets discuss it.

First up, I know for sure you have build many more motors than I have, I am no motor expert, this is for MileHigh mostly, as he is a stegler for clutching at straws with icecream in the middle.

So, What are some of the differences I can think of. Maybe we should ask, whats the same about them. Lets just list it up first:
   1: Speed up under load
   2: Low Impedance coils are usually best.
   3: Depending on version, one may have Magnets on Rotor, other Magnets are on the Stator.
   4: Normally an Electric Motor drives the Rotor.
   5: The G-Field Generator is based on the Kromrey Converter.
   6: Usually 2 Coils on the G-Field Gen, normally more on the Kromrey Converter, 4 in the patent.
   7: The Kromrey Converter Patent shows multiple Coil configurations.
   8: Basic Magnetic Field idea is to Stress the Field, but this is Version Dependant.
   9: Both are sopposed to have been Over Unity.
   10: Both have been around for some number of years, but the Kromrey Converter is older.

I am streched for more at the moment. Long day, lots of work done. Please feel free to add to the list.

I am now getting a vibe, can you feel that. I am done for today! Night Comrades!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org


P.S: What Chart? This one:

[EMJunkie]

That's the one....

few more minutes...

For all here, I should have bought this topic over onto this Thread as it is very valid and very important:

Certainly Brad, see below:




@TK - Although you did replicate Brads experiment, you got it wrong.

Brad, your scope shot shows the expected 90 degree phase difference as predicted by Faraday's Law: The induced (negative) EMF in the second coil is proportional to the _time rate of change_ of the inducing magnetic field from the first coil.

Faraday's law of induction is a basic law of electromagnetism predicting how a magnetic field will interact with an electric circuit to produce an Electromotive Force, E.M.F (e), is defined in Coulomb's of Charge (C), this is measured in Volts (V)

The Ampere (A), often shortened to "amp", is the SI unit of Electric Current (I), The ampere is equivalent to one coulomb (roughly 6.241×1018 times the elementary charge) per second. Amperes are used to express flow rate of electric charge.

Here in lies the problem. Brads Circuit is looking at Current (I) or Amperes on one side of the Circuit, and on the other, it is looking at the Voltage (V).

As you correctly pointed out:

Current is not voltage (EMF). 

So, you are comparing Apples and Oranges, this cant be done!!! This is wrong!!! EMF, when talking about EMF, must be compared with its couneter part, the Negative of the source EMF which IS and always will be, 180 Degrees out of phase!

Saying that 10 cars are out on the road, and 10 cars went down the road at 200MPH are totally different things, Volume vs Speed and one is not the other!

I am sorry TK but you are giving people a Bung Steer and this is very important!!!


So, E.M.F (e) has a phase relationship of 180 Degrees to the Source.

Some more data on this:

Bill - Very mature response! Thank You for that.

Fair bit of Love shown for TK however. But as you stated, Its about the Facts, real Science and proving the Lies Wrong!

So, back to it.

Lie: Current is EMF and part of Faradays Law of Induction - This is a lie and I have proven this: Click Here

Truth: EMF is defined in Coulomb's of Charge (C), which is a Quantity measured in Volts (V) - This is a completely True and I have proven this: Click Here

Most every single book in the universe and every single person with any qualification knows that: The E.M.F that Faradays law of Electromagnetic Induction predicts, that Heinrich Lenz himself clearly shows, and is incorporated into every single equation of Faradays Law of Electromagnetic Induction, being the (-) Sign, infering and a total reversal of Sign, that: Lenz's Law 180 out of phase to the Source.

E.M.F = -N dϕ/dt

Where:

E.M.F as is clearly shown, is Coulomb's of Charge (C), which is a Quantity measured in Volts (V).
The Negative Sign (-) is the SINE of the Phase relationship as stated by Heinrich Lenz himself.


Simple Calculus:

            int width = this.pictureBox1.Width;
            int height = this.pictureBox1.Height;

            Bitmap b = new Bitmap(width, height);
            Graphics g = Graphics.FromImage(b);
            g.Clear(Color.White);

            for (int i = 0; i < width; i++)
            {
                int y = (int)((Math.Sin((double)i * 2.0 * Math.PI / width) + 1.0) * (height - 1) / 2.0);
                b.SetPixel(i, y, Color.Black);
            }


            for (int i = 0; i < width; i++)
            {
                int y = (int)((-Math.Sin((double)i * 2.0 * Math.PI / width) + 1.0) * (height - 1) / 2.0);
                b.SetPixel(i, y, Color.Red);
            }

            this.pictureBox1.Image = b;



Where the only thing that has changed from the Black to Red wave form is the (-) sign before the Math.Sin part.


See the Simple Picture: "Some SIMPLE Calculus.png"


So, once more, because I like the look of it, I need to reference:

Electrical Science for Technicians

Ref: Electrical Science for Technicians: Page 198

There is no such Phase Angle of ±90 Degrees that is related to the EMF, that is predicted by Faradays Law of Induction, at all. It is ±180...

Keeping in mind, 30.3326Hz was the target frequency defined by Tinman

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

I came accross an interesting site in the quest to reference information. I thought it would be interesting to share.

See the below Image: Ref: Faraday's Law of Induction and Lenz' Law

Now I wonder what this Positive Feedback Loop might look like? Yes you already know too!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org