Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[Polarisz]

ALL,

I have been a member here since 2010. You will not find any posts prior to this due to seeing too many personal attacks on this site.
Chris is trying to share something with all of you, and all he asks is that you replicate his experiment to see the effect that he has been studying for 15 years.
Typically a tank circuit will have a Q and as you load that circuit the Q will diminish.  By using Chris's method of bucking/partnered/mirrored coils, when you add a load to the tank circuit it still retains a high Q with the addition of the load. Utilizing the method of bucking/partnered/mirrored coils we currently are lighting a 12V light bulb and the circuit is retaining a Q of over 20.
I would hope that you are all open minded enough to replicate Chris' work and find out for yourself.  If you learn nothing else you will at least see an unexpected unique effect.

[EMJunkie]

PW, Ramset,


PW, I fully understood, it is you that have entirely missed the Boat. I can not help with your Comprehension Problems, I am good but not that good - Sorry old mate!

Chet - I see words but its all a fuzzy mess... Did you go to the same school PW did? Incomprehensibly unintelligible contrivance. Some things to look at might be formatting, use of the Quote Tags... Sorry the rest is up to you. I dont have all day.


PW, you would not be in this mess if you spend 1 minute to read properly.





@ALL - There is actually a Very good reason I have spent so much time covering the information I have.

Many here, very much smarter than PW and Chet, will see the relationships I have shown and detailed with great detail are actually very important.

Tinman is in descovery now and will find some amazing things if he sticks at it and looks at the relationships without jumping to conclsions. Like PW and Chet.

You can see for sure here, that the relationships are very interesting from the Flux Phi, to the other Quantitys, Current and Voltage.

Its entirely a Reactive condition, and this condition has nothing what so ever to do with Faraday's law of Electromagnetic Induction!

Known as Complex Impedance and Circuit Analysis - Which you dont need to know inside out, but only be aware of.

How does adding a Capacitor to the Circuit change things so much?

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

ALL,

I have been a member here since 2010. You will not find any posts prior to this due to seeing too many personal attacks on this site.
Chris is trying to share something with all of you, and all he asks is that you replicate his experiment to see the effect that he has been studying for 15 years.
Typically a tank circuit will have a Q and as you load that circuit the Q will diminish.  By using Chris's method of bucking/partnered/mirrored coils, when you add a load to the tank circuit it still retains a high Q with the addition of the load. Utilizing the method of bucking/partnered/mirrored coils we currently are lighting a 12V light bulb and the circuit is retaining a Q of over 20.
I would hope that you are all open minded enough to replicate Chris' work and find out for yourself.  If you learn nothing else you will at least see an unexpected unique effect.

Hear, hear - Mr Polarisz is exactly right!!!

The demonstration I put on YouTube back in Nov 2, 2014; Solid State Generator - How to Build and tune a Solid State Electrical Generator!!! - Low Level OU, was at the time, nearly 2 years old.

If the output is maximised and there is a tuned point, which I show you how to get to it, then once there, you can work on minimising the Input.

I clearly show you, there is no Lenz's Effects when tuned!

Once this frequency is determined, then Resonate the input at this frequency, it can give you a very good gain after some fiddling.

Come on, please Inventors, Study carefully, replicate carefully. It does work!!!

Below, an image of my 2013 experiment:

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

Please remember what I have said, Look for the effects first, then make improvements.

In this picture, I have three identical coils, this was the discovery of the effect. As you can see, the Partnered Output Coils were two Identical Coils, one flipped over from the other and not CW / CCW.

It is the effects that led you to OU!!!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[tinman]

 author=EMJunkie link=topic=15395.msg480507#msg480507 date=1460530559]

1: Tinman has nothing to do with the debate.

Actually i do Chris,as it was me that asked the question(that was aimed toward minnie ,after his comment toward me). My answer was /is the same as TK's,and i stand by it.

TK is still wrong in his statement:

TKs given answer is correct.

PW - You are still wrong.

I doubt that very much Chris.

Faradays Law does not PREDICT an angle of 90 Degrees, nor does it PREDICT Voltage to Current Phase Angles of any kind

It dose that exactly when there is no current flowing through the secondary coil.

Faraday's Law is entirely dependant on, and would not be valid without, the relationship of Electric to Magnetic Fields. You are so wrong!!! and will not admit it!

And the inverse is true,where it predicts changing magnetic fields giving rise to an EMF across an inductor.


Brad