Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[minnie]

  Nobody ever seems to bother about what Einstein and Newton think.
  Lens's law can be derived from Gauss' law and the Lorentz transformation
  without the use of magnetic fields.
  Guess what can be done with a covariant equations!
          John.

[EMJunkie]

OMG - Erfinder Seriously - Go Away!!!

You are not wanted here!!!

Take your Oompa Loompa Science away and help your Brother Oompa Loompa's

    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

  Nobody ever seems to bother about what Einstein and Newton think.
  Lens'so law can be derived from Gauss' law and the Lorentz transformatione,
  without the use of magnetic fields.
  Guess what can be done with a covariant equations!
          John.

Oh finally some sensible logical Science!!!

John, please enlighten us! I think I know where youre heading...

    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

This is the exact response I didn't want but anticipated.  It demonstrates that you are all talk and no action.  It reveals to all that you are as spineless as you are arrogant.  Your best work is that you have a blind following. 

Punked by an oompa lumpa......

COWARD!

Keep kidding yourself Marry Poppins!


    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

John's derivation is something I have been thinking about.

Gauss Law for an even Electric Field Distribution is:

   ϕ_Electric = E A cos(θ)

Lorentz Transformation, for a moving reference frame is:

   β=v/c 
   γ= 1/sqrt(1 - v² / c²)

I am not sure on how, the derivations can get to Lenz's Law. I am sure some complex math can derive anything we really are smart enough to derive.

My guess is that the covariant equations show that is Lenz's Law, is, infact, invariant.

The fact is, Lenz's Law is Invariant. Most Oompa Loompa Scientists have no clue at all what Lenz's Law actually is! Which is funny.

It is very simple, Lenz's Law is a Electromagnetic Field - Plain and Simple.

The Flow of Current, Invoked by Faraday's Law of Electromagnetic Induction is a Magnetic Field, there will always be an EMF, 180 Degrees, conventionally, to the Source EMF, Changing in Time. There can easily be a Degree of Offset which I have already shown and proven to be true, so the Angle should be seen as just that, an Angle (∠)

This is an EMF to EMF Angle, not Current to Voltage or any crazy guess that Oompa Loompa Scientists might fanaticise about.

The No Brainer here is, to minimise the Reflected response on the Input to the system that Lenz's Law has come into existance from.

    Chris Sykes
        hyiq.org