Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[Bob Smith]

Floyd Sweet said: [...]

Turbo Charged Induction is my definition there!

P.S: Key sentance: "as more current is required by varying loads more feedback magnetomotive forces free more electrons from binding forces complimented by potential magnetic forces"

Love it!

Here's a question, Chris. Could we envision this idea of feedback magnetomotive forces freeing "electrons" from "binding forces complimented by potential magnetic forces" in terms of accessing voltage-dielectricity (separated from amperage-magnetism) through the action within these partnered output coils?

What I am proposing is that these feedback magnetomotive forces cause pure dielectricity (Sweet's "electrons" unbound from "potential magnetic forces") to enter the system from the immediate surrounding area, as required by the load?

I have more I could say in this regard, but would like to see what you think.
Thanks,
Bob

[EMJunkie]

Love it!

Here's a question, Chris. Could we envision this idea of feedback magnetomotive forces freeing "electrons" from "binding forces complimented by potential magnetic forces" in terms of accessing voltage-dielectricity (separated from amperage-magnetism) through the action within these partnered output coils?

What I am proposing is that these feedback magnetomotive forces cause pure dielectricity (Sweet's "electrons" unbound from "potential magnetic forces") to enter the system from the immediate surrounding area, as required by the load?

I have more I could say in this regard, but would like to see what you think.
Thanks,
Bob

Hey Bob - Please set me straight if I go off track.

If I understand your question correctly, I will try to explain. Let me start at the start: We are dealing with two different things. Voltage and Current, although we typically think of them as the same thing, EG: the product of the two being Power, we really do need to think of them as separate things. I know you know this stuff, but let me try to explain:

Voltage, also called electromotive force, is a quantitative expression of the potential difference in charge between two points in an electrical field.

Current is a flow of electrical charge carriers, usually electrons or electron-deficient atoms.

As an example, we could visit two different Rivers', same length and volumes of Water (Potential or Voltage), but flowing at very different rates (Current). Floyd Sweet gives us a clue:

The current and potential windings require relatively little power

Two separate windings, one for Voltage, and one for Current. Why would he define each separately in this fashion? Because there is a need to!

The Time Rate of Change of the Magnetic Field creates a Voltage, this is just a Potential. No Current can flow if the Terminals are open, or not connected to a load.

The Magnetic Field Density (B), itself is directly related to Current and not the change of it. One ampere per meter is equal to: 4𝛑 × 10⁻³ Oersted.

This is an astounding sentence once comprehended. So, Magnetic Flux is Current, the two, are the same thing, and there is no change in time required for this equivalence, as far as I know anyway. Yet there is for Voltage!!! No Change in Time and there can be no Voltage!!!

Isn't this astounding!!!

So, dielectric, technically, is the Material where a Potential can be applied, E.G: across the Capacitor Plates. Dielectricity could be thought of as this stored Electricity. So to answer your question, not really.

We are dealing with stored Energy, in the form of Mass Energy Equivalence, but this is not in a Dielectric, it's in the Quantum Structures we term as Atoms.

The processes we need to incorporate need to pump this Energy from the Quantum Structures, in the Copper Conductors we use. Electromagnetic Induction can be very much more efficient than we have known for so many years, seen in Electric Transformers today.

Induction we see today, is the product of Volts(Potential) and Current (One Amp = 6.24 x 10¹⁸ electrons⁄second) – We view Volts as a Potential and not a means of doing "Work", but Current is considered as a means of doing "Work"!!!

So, Amplifying Current should be our primary goal, and Voltage, being that it is Potential, can be changed easily!!!

However, we measure Electric Power in the product of the two and therefore need the two together. Volts times Amps.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[forest]

EMJunkie


Can you repeat experiment but in Mhz range ? Is it still the same effect ?

[EMJunkie]

EMJunkie


Can you repeat experiment but in Mhz range ? Is it still the same effect ?

Not sure, never gone than high.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[Enjoykin2017]

Hi EM-master of Oz 

Chris ,
does B field depend from specific resistance of wire conductor/s for some given current density and voltage ?

Or simple - which conductor will make greater B field in simple experiment - copper or steel // both with same diameter and lenght - with same initial conditions current and voltage  // ?

And does near thermodynamic aboslute zero temperature with some given current density there will be present B Filed or not ? And why not or yes ?

Does Biot-Savart's law is valid near thermodynamic aboslute zero temperatur or not ?
Or simple does B field is wire-geometry dependent and wire-properties dependent ?

You have acquired all necessary equipment in your lab (compass and oscillograph ) to easy proove or disprove some /unknown/ facts.!!

.................................................................................
Chris  I am free to ask you with your own question: If you saw something so amazing, something you had no idea how or why it worked, would you prefer to believe in "Einstain´s and main stream science Black-Magic" or in "Proofs" discovered by you" ?

Before answer or not study this picture  bellow ! 

wire copper, diameter 0,5 mm.
"Same Current >200 Amps different behaviour !! How it is possible ??"

Best wishes
Enjoykin