Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

Started by EMJunkie, January 16, 2015, 12:08:38 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 219 Guests are viewing this topic.

itsu


Wistiti,

so you think that is good?  We still use 587mW just to run the circuit without a load.
That means the transistor and the building / maintaining of the magnetic fields.



SkyWatcher123,

thanks, but why would i try the sucahyo pulse drive circuit?   Should it be even more efficient?
Do you have any input/output/efficiency data?



QuoteHey Sky! Itsu a real pleasure to see you are still on it :)

;D


Itsu

SkyWatcher123

Hi all, Hi itsu, i seem to recall sucahyo, getting in the 80% efficiency range while the coil was loaded.
I suggested using the sucahyo circuit, because if you are using DC pulses, then this circuit can give very sharp DC pulses, by using the coil spike to trigger the PNP transistor.
Plus, sucahyo has said that the reverse orientation as shown, of the PNP transistor, reduces the input amperage greatly, which i think is caused by a much shorter duty cycle.
peace love light

itsu


Sky,

ok,  thanks,  "greatly reduced input amperage" sounds good, i will see if i can combine the both circuits somehow.

The main reason for the original circuit, as i understand it, would be that the bucking coils somehow further increase the efficiency beyond the 100%.


Regards Itsu

wistiti

Quote from: itsu on October 21, 2016, 03:21:22 PM
Wistiti,

so you think that is good?  We still use 587mW just to run the circuit without a load.
That means the transistor and the building / maintaining of the magnetic fields.



SkyWatcher123,

thanks, but why would i try the sucahyo pulse drive circuit?   Should it be even more efficient?
Do you have any input/output/efficiency data?



;D


Itsu

Ooopps! Sorry! Phone corrector...!😉

Hey itsu i dont mean the driving circuit is efficient. The point i highlight is the fact is in a standard circuit, if we add 100w load to a system the total consumption of the system must be something like the driving power +the load power.... But when we had poc on the output, that not seem to be wright... See one of my old test of the same setup.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=E7aJmDRK04o
When i connect the load the circuit use less power.  :D

EMJunkie

Quote from: wistiti on October 21, 2016, 05:28:38 PM
Ooopps! Sorry! Phone corrector...!😉

Hey itsu i dont mean the driving circuit is efficient. The point i highlight is the fact is in a standard circuit, if we add 100w load to a system the total consumption of the system must be something like the driving power +the load power.... But when we had poc on the output, that not seem to be wright... See one of my old test of the same setup.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=E7aJmDRK04o
When i connect the load the circuit use less power.  :D




This is exactly correct! Efficiency is important, one must make small improvements, one step at a time, anyone starting, building, should be starting with at least 80% Efficiency! Or there is terrible problems. 43% and there is something terribly wrong somewhere!

This is simply natural progression, I saw the same thing when I replicated Steven E Jones JT, it took some time and work to make the small improvements to get it working properly.

I found the best Transistor was actually a Fet, J6910 - See Datasheet attached.

High Frequency, this Fet hit the Coils really hard with sharp gradient, Time Rate of Change.

I have wound some coils up and have my JPOC nearly done. I have ordered some parts, and just found they will be a few days. So I will have some data up in a few days.


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org