Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[itsu]

Chris,

thanks for the post about series and parallel resonance, but i have to agree with the comments from gyulasun.
Current through a capacitor will always lead the voltage across it and current through an inductor will always lag the voltage across it, with 90°
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/phase.html

That is what you showed with your measurements as they are INSIDE the series or parallel circuit like i wrongly did the day before yesterday.
When looking from outside the series or parallel circuit like from the input, the current will either lag or lead the voltage depending on which side of resonance we are.
When IN resonance, we are left with resistance only (as Xc and Xl are canceling each other) which has a phase between them of 0°

At least that is how i understand all this and that is what my last video showed.


It looks to me up till now that the MePreva circuit is a parallel LC circuit in which the both opposite coils are canceling each other and we are left
with the strongest coil (11 turns) remanence inductance (540uH).

Together with the 1uF cap we have a parallel LC circuit with all the behaviours that comes with it.

I will try to use a Hall sensor to further test the magnetic fields (will be hard as they are contained inside the toroid) and make them visible.


EDIT   Oops,  i did not see gyulasuns post, so with the agreement of the comments from gyulasun i mean his earlier post.
Need to look at his above post now.

Itsu

[Dog-One]

Well Chris-no cigar here-i found the error--> 2 incorrect value CVRs is all it took to throw the readings out.
At these small power values, .2 of an ohm can make a big difference.
So,my P/in CVR was .9 ohm's,and the P/out CVR was 1.1 ohms-well as best as my best DMM could make out. Both are banded as 1 ohm.

Brad

Chet,

Please assist Brad to acquire a precision 6-digit Low-Z benchtop DMM.  Brad is routinely using CVRs and they need to be calibrated.

[ramset]

Matt
Good suggestion
I know Brad usually does check this ,it was a hurried flingtogether ,his bench/shop is not really set up yet from the move.

[Dog-One]

Good suggestion

My recommendation.

Give ol' Mr. Steve Sandler a ring.  He'll make things right.

[hyiq]

Chris,

You are making a big mistake.   Luc is highly qualified to verify or disprove your claims.  He is also extremely dedicated to finding the truth.  A
couple of years ago I built a circuit that I was sure was OU.  My power out was clearly greater than my power in.  Luc asked if he could try
and duplicate that circuit.  We conferred back and forth as he attempted to duplicate my efforts.  He was not able to get OU which was not
what I was expecting.  So we went over again exactly what I had and could find no faults in either his build or mine.  I then decided it had to
be a measurement error even though I was actually using inline meters to measure my current.  When I compared the input inline
meter reading with a calibrated current sensing resistor it was discovered that my inline amp meter had apparently been damaged in such a way
that it was reading much lower than the actual current.  Using another meter showed there was no OU.  Of course I was disappointed but
as least I didn't waste a lot of other peoples time trying to prove something that didn't exist.  Instead of ranting and calling Luc a lot of names
I thanked him for taking the time to help me find my error.

I have already posted why Woopy's test is not a valid test because of the use of the clamp on meter.  If you have a real test showing
actual input and output measurements that will stand up to peer review scrutiny I would like to see it.  So far I have not seen that in any of the
videos you have posted that are supposedly proving your claims.  I am NOT saying you may not have something but until we actually see
some clear and accurate measurements how can we know for sure.

If clear and real measurements prove you do not have something will that be enough to convince you or will you still insist everyone else is
wrong and only you are right?

Respectfully,
Carroll

Carroll - Your Opinion is dually noted.


I would like to point out, through a series of Comprehension Issues, I will take your advise and invoke the right to make my own decisions.


For qualification is in the eye of the beholder, and someone that refused to comprehend the most simple things, in my eyes is not qualified!


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org