Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[Magluvin]

Well As it seems that we have yet another person moderated(on his own thread),i will post a link to his video here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2PV6N75mrk


Brad

I like that experiment starting at 5:50 in the vid. Have you done that one yet?  After listening to his 3 latest vids, I see a different personality than what I pictured from just reading the forum.

Mags

[tinman]

   

Mags

I like that experiment starting at 5:50 in the vid. Have you done that one yet?

Not yet Mag;s,but will be doing so this weekend.
How about you?-going to give it a try?
Seems like a simple current loop circuit to me,but lets have a look anyway.

After listening to his 3 latest vids, I see a different personality than what I pictured from just reading the forum.

I was thinking the very same thing.


Brad

[Magluvin]

Not yet Mag;s,but will be doing so this weekend.
How about you?-going to give it a try?
Seems like a simple current loop circuit to me,but lets have a look anyway.

I was thinking the very same thing.


Brad

Yeah, but the current loop is odd. From the looks of the windings they are pretty low ohms. 2+ amps in and 2+ amps on the larger winding(reverse current of input) and 5+ amps on the smaller winding. How can we take advantage of that? I wonder if it is any different than without the resistor csr?

Without a definite full understanding yet, I can imagine a complex thing happening, at a certain freq with the coils set ip that way.  Lol. wonder what a sim would show.

Mags

[tinman]

Yeah, but the current loop is odd. From the looks of the windings they are pretty low ohms. 2+ amps in and 2+ amps on the larger winding(reverse current of input) and 5+ amps on the smaller winding. How can we take advantage of that? I wonder if it is any different than without the resistor csr?

Without a definite full understanding yet, I can imagine a complex thing happening, at a certain freq with the coils set ip that way.  Lol. wonder what a sim would show.

Mags

I guess were talking about the same thing here?--see image below.

But what comes out,in the way of current?
5.1 - 2.3 = 2.8
Seems it would be the same as what went in.
We would also see some sort of voltage drop,due to winding resistance.

And what are these coils wound on?
If they are wound on a straight core,then the winding direction would have to be different to that if we used a toroid core.

Chris promotes this OU design quite alot,but as of yet,has shown nothing in the way of an OU device.
If he knows what he is talking about,why has he not yet been able to produce his claimed OU device?.


Brad

P.S-and now i will actually post the diagram.

[tinman]

OK,well some truth's starting to come out.

Below is my first video test of the !also! below schematic.

The results are not as depicted in the schematic.

First up,the current flows through each coil in phase-not 180* out of phase,as depicted in the schematic.
Second,the current through the coil with the least amount of turns,is never more than the input current-it is always less.
The two combined current values are less than the total input current,as we are also driving the circuit.

I have also tried an !off the shelf! transformer,using the two secondary output's-->results were the very same.

I have also attached an amended schematic,with the results and values re-arranged to suit the results i got from my test's.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fx91NRxRS4c


Brad