Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy

[skywatcher]

Some thoughts about 'non-inductive coils': If you make a 'coil' like the one pictured below, it is absolutely non-inductive. When you measure it with a LCR meter you even get a 'negative' inductance (the inductance of probe cables + coil is lower than the inductance of the probe cables alone). But we have learned in school that every current generates a magnetic field. So where is the magnetic field going to ?  It can not simply 'cancel'.

My theory: If the magnetic field has difficulties building itself up in 3D space, it will go 'somewhere else' where it is easier. So maybe it escapes to higher dimensions. If we can get 'excess' energy from such a structure, this might be energy from some 'parallel space'.

BTW such a coil like shown in the picture also has weird effects. When pulses are sent through it and you put your hand near the coil, you can sometimes feel warm or cold, depending on position and/or frequency. Sensitive people sometimes have difficulties to even get near such a coil because they feel very uncomfortable.


(picture source: http://biogenesislab.blogspot.com/2007/02/how-to-wind-toroidal-mobius-coils.html)

[seychelles]

THANKS FOR SHARING SKY.

[Toolofcortex]

http://www.mysearch.org.uk/websiteX/html/3%20Plane%20Standing%20Waves.htm

Standing waves are certainly among the most neglected domains in physics. One can identify many misunderstood characteristics. For example:

Nodes and antinodes may move in a moving frame of reference because of the Doppler effect.

In such a case, they also contract (this explains Relativity).

One obtains "partially standing waves" if amplitude differs.

Both frequency and amplitude may even be different.

Spherical standing waves exhibit a lambda antinode core, not lambda / 2.

Waves traveling along a moving transverse axis are tilted in order to follow it.

Standing waves then produce a very special checkerboard pattern moving sideways.

Standing waves do not contain traveling waves while they are stable. This is totally false.

Scientists seldom mention such characteristics. They prefer to spread out their knowledge with a lot of complicated equations. This is sometimes quite useless. For instance, many diagrams from this site were simply displayed by computer using sine functions only. Others were made using Huygen's Principle, without the help of equations.

Augustin Fresnel stated that energy equals the square of amplitude. Because amplitude is two times higher for two equal sets of waves adding constructively, energy is four times higher there. This explains why billions of waves mixing together do not cancel energy in accordance with the Great Numbers Law. The wave energy simply cannot be destroyed on condition that it is not transferred into heat because of the imperfect mechanism of the medium.

Standing waves do not contain waves traveling in opposite directions. 

Two sets of plane parallel waves traveling in opposite directions will indeed produce plane standing waves.  One may place a plane parallel screen in the way of just one set of plane traveling waves and also obtain standing waves. Other methods are possible. From a mathematical point of view, one then can add their amplitude and obtain the classical standing wave pattern.

----------------------------

Quite the mindfuck...

What I think he is saying, is that the way in wich matter is affected, concept of energy transferred, is totally different? What he say ?

It seems a "energy transfer" between is like an "untappable" type of novel energy transfer in resonance, or should I say, at a rythm not in resonance. Inertia is spoken of.

A new type of "rythm" to apply on matter, does certain matter prefer "this rythm" or "this rythm".

I wonder now how My circuit would do in an AC way, because I can make inductance low, I can make this 10mhz much mass of wire.

Pure sinus AC resonance, but wich drive topology?

Answer me your lowly imbeciles

[Anti.Semitic]

that just produces a none inductive coil, we all know that bit.

what we need to know is did you bifilar wind it on the width of the coil bobbin or half of it on one cheek and the other 3ed winding on the remaining cheek or did you just layer wind it?

can you ' de complicate it ' with a detailed description of how to wind the bobbin and number of turns or inductance of each winding?

Obviously no one else is going to ask while I'm asking, now are they!

Raymondo

read the damn thread, educate yourself, do not jump to ridiculous conclusions, educate yourself, understand what you have been told, educate yourself. what does the thread start of with, what does it explain? whats the focus on the first post? whats the point and why the title 'non-inductive', educate yourself, focus on the topic and the clear and present points made!

the thread: http://www.aboveunity.com/thread/non-inductive-experiment/

educate yourself

[Anti.Semitic]

Some thoughts about 'non-inductive coils': If you make a 'coil' like the one pictured below, it is absolutely non-inductive. When you measure it with a LCR meter you even get a 'negative' inductance (the inductance of probe cables + coil is lower than the inductance of the probe cables alone). But we have learned in school that every current generates a magnetic field. So where is the magnetic field going to ?  It can not simply 'cancel'.

My theory: If the magnetic field has difficulties building itself up in 3D space, it will go 'somewhere else' where it is easier. So maybe it escapes to higher dimensions. If we can get 'excess' energy from such a structure, this might be energy from some 'parallel space'.

BTW such a coil like shown in the picture also has weird effects. When pulses are sent through it and you put your hand near the coil, you can sometimes feel warm or cold, depending on position and/or frequency. Sensitive people sometimes have difficulties to even get near such a coil because they feel very uncomfortable.


(picture source: http://biogenesislab.blogspot.com/2007/02/how-to-wind-toroidal-mobius-coils.html)

you are getting hung up on the meaning of 'non-inductive'. again look at the points made and what it took to step forward. not the words!

whats the difference between two coils with current in opposite directions compared to non inductive? the same thing occurs right?

focus on the steps taken by Chris, not the words.