Question: Promises requested

[Trump]

Paul Lowrance,

It seems that this forum is a little slow lately, I guess many people are working on things or using some other sites. How are things going with your project? I have looked at a lot of the listings on the over unity type of electric motors, it appears that most of the concept lately is the motor with windings and not the type of motor that has moving parts. Is there a good reason for the winding type motor over the moving parts motor. Can you get as much workable voltage on the winding type motor as the type that has moving parts?

  Respectfully

   Trump

[PaulLowrance]

Hi Trump.

I think both methods are promising, but the solid-state method should be most promising since there are no moving parts. I think the solid-state could eventually generate more power. Although I could perhaps be biased since the MEMM will be solid-state, except for the high power compact versions will need a fan or method of keeping the core at near room temperature.

Regards,
Paul Lowrance

[Trump]

Paul,

Thanks for the quick reply, I was just wondering on the two types of motors and which may turn out to be the best to lean to. Less moving parts may have less problems I am sure. Thanks for your reply and I  hope that the motor concept you are working on will prevail. I have been reading a lot and trying to get a better understanding on how the winding type motor works. I will keep reading and I will watch the postings closely.

   Respectfully

   Trump

[supersam]

paul,

i really don't have the knowledge or expertice in this field to promise that i will build this project personally.  i do, however have the resources to promise i will have one built.  i can hardly wait!!!! will you please get a move on it!!!!

it will be the best day of my life when i get a check from my utility company for power that i sold them instead of just the quarterly dividend check..

thanks for your efforts, lol,
sam

[PaulLowrance]

Hi Sam,

Yes, that will be one of the greatest days in history. My huge problem in life is being an astronomically huge perfectionist.   It's just difficult to overcome, but will try to get with the program and get a nanocrystalline core to close to loop.  I already have my proof that "free energy" is available by means of MCE. Now it's just a matter of time.

There is still question as to if amorphous magnetic material has atomic size or even nano size domains. I've swept the Internet so many times, emailed dozens of magnetic specialists, lol and cannot find any information.  It really doesn't matter that much initially since nanocrystalline cores have very small domains, which will work, but it just bothers me such cores are so expensive.  So if we can manage to squeeze 100 watts of "free energy" per $120 Metglas core in a closed loop system then we'll need 10 cores to achieve 1 KW for a total of $1200 plus other parts. So lets say $1500. And initially 100 watts will be a huge challenge.  I know there must be cheaper cores out there that can get the job done. It's just a matter of time finding them. So perhaps initially the first 1 KW design might be a little expensive. Time will tell.

Regards,
Paul Lowrance