Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Rosch taking orders on OU Bouyancy device.

Started by ramset, April 26, 2015, 09:52:03 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 22 Guests are viewing this topic.

Pirate88179

Quote from: Farmhand on May 01, 2015, 10:39:27 PM
Pirate I was referring to over speed events in aircraft under the speed of sound, even without approaching Mach 1 many older planes became almost uncontrollable and just continued to dive into the ground it is well documented, and spoken by the pilots themselves. The controls become so heavy
the pilot cannot pull out of the dive in time. So a lack of control due to over speed but no breaking up of the plane until ground strike.

I agree, that is true.  What I was trying to say was, not only do the control forces for the pilots (back then prior to hydraulics and computer controls) get heavier and heavier, way before Mach 1 shock waves move around the airframe also causing control ability problems.  Yeager, in his books, said he could see shock waves on his wings when diving his Mustang wide open, and that was probably just under 600 mph.

The early dive bombers had the problem you speak about.  My 2nd flight instructor told me many tales of guys he knew not being able to pull out in time after dropping the bombs.

Bill
See the Joule thief Circuit Diagrams, etc. topic here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6942.0;topicseen

tinman

Quote from: Farmhand on May 01, 2015, 10:39:27 PM
Pirate I was referring to over speed events in aircraft under the speed of sound, even without approaching Mach 1 many older planes became almost uncontrollable and just continued to dive into the ground it is well documented, and spoken by the pilots themselves. The controls become so heavy
the pilot cannot pull out of the dive in time. So a lack of control due to over speed but no breaking up of the plane until ground strike.

The guys(some of who are still alive and well today ???)who couldnt handle a cessna well enough to get there licence managed to handle a 757 and 767"s at way over Vmo-and Mmo speeds with no problem Farmhand lol. MarkE will tell you that the target's were huge-couldnt miss them,but last time i went up in a plane,things seem'd really small at just 2000ft. But these guys hit them all spot on traveling at way over Vmo speed(1 at 570MPH) with no problem at all. one even managed to make a 330* turn while diving at over 470MPH,and to this day,every trained pilot that has tried has not been able to pull that off in a 757-->but the guys with the box cutters nailed it. ;)

Pirate88179

Quote from: tinman on May 01, 2015, 10:56:05 PM
The guys(some of who are still alive and well today ??? )who couldnt handle a cessna well enough to get there licence managed to handle a 757 and 767"s at way over Vmo-and Mmo speeds with no problem Farmhand lol. MarkE will tell you that the target's were huge-couldnt miss them,but last time i went up in a plane,things seem'd really small at just 2000ft. But these guys hit them all spot on traveling at way over Vmo speed(1 at 570MPH) with no problem at all. one even managed to make a 330* turn while diving at over 470MPH,and to this day,every trained pilot that has tried has not been able to pull that off in a 757-->but the guys with the box cutters nailed it. ;)

Brad:

What you might be missing is, when they took flight training here in the states, and this should have been a HUGE red flag, they did not want to learn how to land.  Just fly.  No take offs, no landings...just fly.  Flying is pretty easy when you eliminate those other two events.  If you had a lot of hours to learn how to just fly...you could have done what they did.

Bill
See the Joule thief Circuit Diagrams, etc. topic here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6942.0;topicseen

Farmhand

Tinman the point is that once the plane is pointed in a direction and accelerated it does not take much control.

And I did say that the plane could well have been remotely controlled by a remote pilot who would of course be very skilled.

In fact once the plane was pointed at the building and reached an over speed condition then missing the building would be
more difficult than keeping the plane in a direct route.

..

TinselKoala

The one part of the whole 911 conspiracy airplane story that I can agree with is the Pentagon maneuver. This is indeed an exceedingly difficult one to pull off and it does seem improbable that someone who was essentially a non-pilot could pull it off the first time, even though he may have practiced it a lot on computer-based flight sim programs.

(For many years in my life I made my living as a sailplane flight instructor, tow pilot, and I gave airshow aerobatic demonstrations in heavy sailplanes like the Lark IS-28B2, culminating in a low pass at just below Vne, in ground effect, finished by a pullup, circle-to-spot-landing maneuver. The Pentagon maneuver, in a large heavy airliner, is precision flying of the highest order. Beginner's Luck? It's a mystery to me, all right.)