Rosch taking orders on OU Bouyancy device.

[tinman]

Stefan:

since none of his Qmogens appear to be doing the job.

Aint that the truth.
In fact,none of the devices Sterling has presented as free energy device has ever paned out-->unless he has one in there with solar pannels some where

[MarkE]

Often very true,, but sometimes it has something.

Someone wondered if we could,, then those that can, did.

Jules thought that it could be done,, somehow,,, and then those that can, did.

Science in a way is a closed system,, all hung  up on what is known and how things are done and used,, where as someone that does not have those things already in place may just make a "stupid" suggestion that in the end is not so silly, or stupid or unreasonable,, but by itself is useless.  Now give that to one of those who can,, and they will take it to the next step and make it useful.

If I had something that showed something new,, I myself could only take that so far,, but give it to some in this group that are talented,, then watch the stuff hit the fan

The imagined possibility is exactly that:  Imagined.  The fantasy does not make the reality.  It sometimes inspires people to do the work to make the reality, when such a thing is possible.

Your concept of science is at best poor and at worst completely wrong.  Science seeks to learn what is real through employment of the scientific method:  A reason and evidence based methodology.

[MarkE]

In the past couple of week's,i have found this to be very true.

This is exactly what i did. I had two tanks-1 x 10ltr volume and 1 x 20ltr volume. The 10ltr tank was tank A. This was the tank that stored the energy in the form of compressed gas. Tank B was the receiver. When the venturi was added to the system,this became what you call C.

Now,a series of 5 test were carried out,where the gas in tank A was aloud to flow into tank B via way of a ball valve. MarkE done the calculations,and we were getting an efficiency of 98% in the transfer when the gas temperature was aloud to settle to ambiant temperature. At this time,all was good. Then i fitted the venturi between tanks A and B,so as external gas(ambiant air) was drawn into tank B when the ball valve was opened between tank's A&B. I then gave MarkE the results in way of pressure and temperature when the gas was once again aloud to settle to ambiant temperature-->both test carried out in identical circumstances and conditions,only one could draw in gas from the enviroment. I got back--this makes no sense,as the result was 110%.

From there on in,it just went down hill from there. I continued to implement the ram into the system,and once again obtained the results over 5 test runs. As in the last two test,the results were averaged out over the 5 test runs. I once again gave the figures to MarkE to calculate. From there on in,everything went pear shaped. I was told that no results would be given until i disclose the units working as a whole. I was told they were nonsense figures,and mean nothing until i disclose the system as a whole,and exactly how it work's. This can be read by all those that are interested in the open systems thread.

I had some one else crunch the number's,and we ended up with around 133% efficiency.
We now see comments like-wait until you try to do useful work with your stored energy -->What kind of an idiotic comment is that?. I think we can be quite confident that a 30ltr volume of gas at a pressure of 18psi over the two tank's is going to do more work that a 30ltr volume of gas at a pressure of 12psi over the two tanks-->when both temperatures are the same.

It is funny to see how the guru's bail out when things dont make sense to them,and when things start looking better than they should,they demand to see the system as a whole before helping out any further.

The truth is that-the energy stored in tank A was able to create a situation where it could draw energy in from the enviroment without loosing any energy itself. I dont know why the guru's find it so hard to understand that when you allow gas from the enviroment to flow into the tank's,and no gas can escape the tank's,that the end result wont be a higher gas mass amount in the two tanks when the cycle has finished.

MarkE was confused as to why i would use the small tank as the energy storage tank,and not the large one,as i would loose less energy during the transfer if i used the large tank as tank A,and the small tank(the receiver)as tank B. Well im sure there are those that will understand now as to why i did it that way,and the results speak for them self.

I think some guru's have a diode like mind,where there physics(or known physics)may leave,but if results dont agree with there physics,then that cannot enter-and everything comes to a holt for them-->as it did in my case.

So there you go AC,we started with 100% energy in tank A,and when the cycle was complete,we ended up with 133% of stored energy in tanks A&B. The extra 33% came from the enviroment,and that is exactly where it will be returned when put to work. No laws broken here,as when the energy stored in the tanks is returned to the enviroment,energy has been conserved.

It is disheartening to see you implode this way.  Complete your project.  Maybe then you will learn.  God knows you have your eyes wide shut right now.

[sterlinga]

Safety lighting is triggered by power failures in Germany , the USA and even here in the Philippines.

I sent the following email to Roberto just now (they're asleep presently):

Dansie said: "Safety lighting is triggered by power failures in Germany , the USA and even here in the Philippines. "   The safety lighting was on during the said time of the AuKW outage.   This is a pretty good point that needs a better explanation than what we've received so far.

/ END OF EMAIL

I just posted the following story:

Featured: Buoyancy > Rosch > GAIA > Demo > Interview with GAIA CEO, Roberto Reuter - Highlights: AuKW is a kinetic power plant; two new videos showing 1) close-up of generator on top of 5 kW tube and 2) changing load by unplugging heater; yesterday's outage, infrared camera; distance between kW-h meters is ~50 M; wall fasteners. (PESN; April 30, 2015) In there, he explained why there was a lag between the time of forgetting to plug the heaters back in and the generator shutting off. GENERAL COMMENT REGARDING PERCEPTION: I wrote the following to someone else by email: [/color][/color]It's amazing how one's world view can taint your outlook. Remember the photo of the old woman versus the young woman. Exact same image is seen by half as a young woman, and by the other half as an old hag. I see the young woman. You see the old hag. Same image. Different perspective.

[sterlinga]

Sterling, sorry to break this to you, but I am the Peter Hughes who commented on your youtube video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OA9WSRDwUiI - Seeking some kind of reply from Lindsey Stirling -- Day 54 of Sup Quest

Myself and John Doe chatted a bit, and well, we have been messing with you.

You have never had a conversation with Lindsey or anyone  who has relayed your "stuff" to her.

Sorry.

Pete


BTW, I don't feel bad about this due to your 911 ravings.

So, Pete, by your saying "your 911 ravings," I take it that can add you to the list of "show me the data" doofuses who believe the establishment line on 9/11. I bet you're in the bottom 5 percent in this crowd on that one. Pretty obvious. Come one. Can a building fall at free-fall speed without help from the inside? Any non-political physicist knows the answer to that one, easily.

I can't disclose details, but I assure you my conversations were extensive with LS. I'm not referring to the one post you're referring to.