"The Shape of Things to Come"

[Pirate88179]

THANKyou e2matrix! - This is one of the most sensible comments I have seen here yet - What a simple solution - i knew there had to be such a fix out there somewhere!
If tinsel-kaola or others had even an inkling of how vital this freely-share info could be, they would have simply copied all of the pics and writing and re-arranged it all to their taste, and by now would have been keenly discussing the CONTENTS! Forget about the silly/dumb formatting!

Yes, well I used FireFox's fit to width and now I can not even read the print as it is so small.  So, why not just resize your images like everyone else does?  Is that so hard to do?  If you do not know how to do this, we can help you.

We are on a new page now so, as long as you post the correct sized images, there will be no more problems.

Bill

[Mr XYZ]

Alvaro, you ask some good questions! - In case I haven't clarified this before, it is not necessary to use mains power for the signals, as this could well come from a motor-gen's excitation winding, or in solid-sate devices, from a battery/mains powered sig-gen etc.

Now, as for the 180 degree timing of the signals, admittedly it wasn't explained in my previous writings, as it's not possible to explain everything in one article, but I can present a short non-math type explanation, and with the help of the attached drawing! Generically speaking, the device needs to be able to 'breathe' so that 90 'relaxation times' are allowed after each pulse, and then in turn, the alternative pulse needs to be another 90 degrees on from this. This whole scheme also allows for a combined or simulated 360 degree virtual rotation of flux(es), which is put into effect via the controlled timing of the input pulses - the schematic may also help to clarify,  quod vid. ..

@Mr XYZ.
The essence of my question was originated by the absence in your math descriptions-analysis
of this 180 deg. out of phase pulse origin.
As it appears to come in from another device-system, should not it be considered-included in the calculations ?
More, . . . is it a precondition that the two batteries are fully charged at the beginning of operation ?
May be these are stupid questions, not my intention to debate, but to clarify.

IMHO if I build a device to get rid of the mains, but I need to feed it with the mains (to run the sig.gen), then I am lost in a long date contradiction. (no offense intended)

cheers
Alvaro

[Mr XYZ]

Bill, I have just seen your question  - If you think for a minute about my thread's title, you will realize that it is more of a predictive type of thing that I am describing, though of course I am still working on models too. I am just one man here, working on projects in my spare time, with limited tools and materials, so for those who want it all served up on a dish with neat in/out readings, I say you will have to wait a little while ... However, I have already shared (more than) enough for this whole move towards "the shape of things to come" that it cannot be stopped!  As for specific components, I have deliberately left these out, making it generic enough to be adapted to power tranisitors or mosfets or whatever, and so of course nobody can then say later: "that didn't work"!   So ... If you have some spare time/equipment on your hands and/or are retired or whatever, I suggest that you trial build some of the circuits I have shared and then tell me - How about that? If I see some constructive feedback/commentary like that, then I will know I have some real partners here, and not just armchair critics.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So, I have a question.  Where is your working device and can you please post the input/out measurements to prove what you are speaking about here? 

Thank you,

Bill

[ekimtoor1]

THANKyou e2matrix! - This is one of the most sensible comments I have seen here yet - What a simple solution - i knew there had to be such a fix out there somewhere!
If tinsel-kaola or others had even an inkling of how vital this freely-share info could be, they would have simply copied all of the pics and writing and re-arranged it all to their taste, and by now would have been keenly discussing the CONTENTS! Forget about the silly/dumb formatting!

No, it is not a sensible suggestion because it will happen again the next time someone oversizes their images.  The web server should be handling this, automatically downsizing the image.