Reflectance-blocking circuits

[Magnethos]

I open this thread to share ideas and investigate about reflectance-blocking circuits.

To start, we first need to understand what is reflectance and how it affects to the performance of the circuit. Well, reflectance is the phenomena that happens when you connect a load into an AC circuit (in DC also happens, but we're interested in AC). As we know, load in the output means that the load is consuming power from the input. This is caused because the load connected in the output affects the input. This is due to the "reflectance" of the conventional circuits. An easy way to see this is to measure the power factor and the watts with and without the load connected in the output. In each case (load connected and no connected load) we'll see how PF and watt consumption changes.

I've been hearing some time in the net that is possible to block that communication between the input and the output by blocking the reflectance. This means that with/without load connected in the output, all the time the lectures (PF and watts) will be the same. So you would be able to connect a load in the output without affecting the input.

For some people this was first known by the Thane Heins bitoroid transformer. That transformer is based on 'reflectance blockage', so the output and the input don't share birirectional communication (input to output  ;  output to input), because the share only a unidirectional communication, from the input to the output. So anything that you connect in the output won't communicate to the input.

Reading about Heins and Bank, I came with a possible idea that I want to share with you. Maybe someone will think about any modification of this circuit of maybe this information will be useful as I show it.

Well, the idea came (as you know) while seeing Heins (Thane Heins bitoroid transformer) and Bank (Michael Bank single wire energy transmission). Also another ideas were useful, but the most important ones were these two. The concept is about blocking reverse communication of the circuit (reverse = output to input), using a 'magnetic diode'. In the attached Picture1, we can see that we need a transmitter circuit and a receiver circuit. Between those circuits, we'll have a single wire energy line. Of course, we'll need to engineer that single-wire line. As we know we've to block the reverse communication of the circuit. The reverse communication is the one that happens when a load is connected to the output and the output communicates with the input.

Based on the work of Heins, it could be possible to block the back magnetomotive force, BMMF, using a saturated core (rod) to prevent that the BMMF reaches the input, at the same time that we've to allow the communication from the input to the output. The FMMF, forward magnetomotive force, is the energy that runs the circuit. Withouth FMMF it won't be possible to obtain energy at the output.

In the second picture you can see the whole idea more easily.

[Magnethos]

As we can see in these pictures, I've introduced the 'magnetic diode' to block the BMMF generated in the output when the load is connected.

The magnetic diode could be a ferrite rod with a coil wired around the rod, controlled by a circuit to add more or less magnetic field until you find a point where the BMMF cannot pass through because the rod is completely saturated and the energy gets blocked in the output part without affecting the input.

[truesearch]

@Magnethos:


Nice write-up! I like where you are going with this.


A minor point: In the last paragraph on your <CONVENTIONAL M.BANK METHOD> Picture, don't you mean to say "When the Load is connected to the ouput, it creates a BMMF. . ." ?


Sincerely,
truesearch

[Magnethos]

Here you've the picture describing a little about the 'magnetic diode'. It would be basically an electromagnet where you can tune the magnetic field generated by the electromagnet until a point where the saturation point is reached by the sum of:
FMMF + external magnetic field generated by the electromagnet, so the BMMF cannot travel back to the source (input).

[Magnethos]

@Magnethos:


Nice write-up! I like where you are going with this.


A minor point: In the last paragraph on your <CONVENTIONAL M.BANK METHOD> Picture, don't you mean to say "When the Load is connected to the ouput, it creates a BMMF. . ." ?


Sincerely,
truesearch

Yes, I mean that. But I've not used B. It was done with that intention (without using the B). Intead of writting BMMF I wrote MMF and I explain you why.

The input (power source) generate a MMF that is in forward direction and it's called FMMF.
The output (load) when connected, it generates a MMF that is backward and it's called BMMF.
As you can see, the input and the output generates magneto motive forces MMF. The difference in those MMF is the direction. FMMF goes from the input to the output. BMMF goes from the output to the input.

If you've seen 'Electric motor secrets' DVD by Peter Lindemann you'll know what I'm talking about FMMF and BMMF and the energy destruction.