Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


New reactionless motor from India

Started by pomodoro, August 15, 2015, 07:43:38 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

guest1289

The  Reason  why that electrical-wire  would rotate,   is  Exactly  the same reason it  rotates  in  the  Faraday-Motor ,  and in Faraday-Motors  it rotates right around,  and in all the much much simpler versions

In  the  device you posted,    I see a wire carrying  DC  current,   rotating  around  one or  two  cylinder magnets ,  the  same  as a faraday-motor

gravityblock

Quote from: guest1289 on August 18, 2015, 01:32:59 PM
The  Reason  why that electrical-wire  would rotate,   is  Exactly  the same reason it  rotates  in  the  Faraday-Motor ,  and in Faraday-Motors  it rotates right around,  and in all the much much simpler versions

In  the  device you posted,    I see a wire carrying  DC  current,   rotating  around  one or  two  cylinder magnets ,  the  same  as a faraday-motor

Yes, it's similar in concept to a Faraday motor.  In a conventional Faraday motor, the field isn't confined and this allows portions of the conductor to be cut twice by the field in opposite directions.  By confining the field, the conductor is only cut once.  This makes it much more efficient.  Also, this allows for a brushless system (in theory) in the correct configuration.  The brushes are a source for huge losses.

Gravock
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

God will confuse the wise with the simplest things of this world.  He will catch the wise in their own craftiness.

guest1289

The  little  rod  labelled  B,  I assume that is not the  piece  emitting  the  electromagnetic field,  causing the  rotation.

The  reason I'm interested in this,  is because you said no one has ever found a design to achieve full rotation,  by using this method,   I'm seeing one potential soution............

  -  One overly simple solution I could see,  is simply a wire carrying Dc current,  causing a  Donut-Shaped  magnet,  to spin on an axle  (  this  Donut could have a normal magnetic-field,  not one running around the circle  )

   -  But I can also think of one( or two ) other solutions

gravityblock

Quote from: guest1289 on August 18, 2015, 01:59:26 PM
The  little  rod  labelled  B,  I assume that is not the  piece  emitting  the  electromagnetic field,  causing the  rotation.

The  reason I'm interested in this,  is because you said no one has ever found a design to achieve full rotation,  by using this method,   I'm seeing one potential soution............

  -  One overly simple solution I could see,  is simply a wire carrying Dc current,  causing a  Donut-Shaped  magnet,  to spin on an axle  (  this  Donut could have a normal magnetic-field,  not one running around the circle  )

   -  But I can also think of one( or two ) other solutions

Only part CAB of electric circuit is exposed to the confined magnetic field, but only part AB on a rod is able to produce angular force momentum of a rigid electric contour. Contour is able to perform limited rotation around CA axle. When the contour is fixed, then C permanent magnet should attempt to rotate in contra direction in regards with reaction of probe to magnet. This should be an ultimate proof that M hypothesis is the valid one and that Faraday failed because he did not use a confined magnetic field.  <---- this description is mostly a copy and paste from the below publication.

Here's a publication on DC machines within M hypotheses that describes it detail.  Also, have a look at the publication titled, "N or M Hypothesis - Final Test", for additional information.  You'll find other proposed solutions, such as yours, within those publications which I think you'll find interesting.

Gravock
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

God will confuse the wise with the simplest things of this world.  He will catch the wise in their own craftiness.

guest1289

.
I think I'll paste  what I have just designed ( invented )  into a  provisional-patent-application  I was going  to send of for something else(  companies often put numerous  inventions  into  individual  provisional( called utility applications in other countries ) patent applications,  to save money,  they're not stupid  )

At a glance,  I can't seem to find something  identical to what I have designed,  in  the  publications you have  provided( it might be there though ),   but,   I just can't be the first person to have thought of it.
_____________
My  initial design  is simply a wire carrying Dc current,  causing a  Donut-Shaped  magnet,  to spin on an axle  (  this  Donut could have a normal magnetic-field,  not one running around the circle,  so it's easy to make  ) .
(  Of course that  wire should probably be replaced with either a coil ,  or something similar to multiply the power  )
______________