World's first real Free Energy Flashlight - no shaking - no batteries! No Solar

[TinselKoala]

Adgex developed and successfully tested a line of autonomous household lamps ranging from 1 to 5 watts.  The 2 watts I used in my example almost falls in the middle of where they tested.  However, their flashlight can power a 5 watt light source from thin air. 

Gravock

Great! Where can I buy one of these autonomous household lamps? Do you have one, or know anyone that does?

As to the other claim of powering a 5 watt light source from thin air... where is your actual evidence for that?

[TinselKoala]

The rate of recharge varies depending on a range of geographic and environmental factors.  In one of their videos, it says if the flashlight is placed in a "dead zone", then it will take 7 -14 days to recharge.  However, if the environmental factors are right, then it can fully recharge in 2 - 4 hours.

Gravock

That's hilarious! So now there are "dead zones" in the Schumann resonance!

Heck, I can say the exact same thing for my own "flashlight", except mine charges even faster "if environmental factors are right"... plus, I use an LED that puts out over 40 lumens on just 310 mW DC.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9wxuRZV-Ro

[gravityblock]

That's hilarious! So now there are "dead zones" in the Schumann resonance!

Heck, I can say the exact same thing for my own "flashlight", except mine charges even faster "if environmental factors are right"... plus, I use an LED that puts out over 40 lumens on just 310 mW DC.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9wxuRZV-Ro

Energy harvesting from the environment isn't anything new, and why you're getting your panties all in a knot over this is quite hilarious to say the least.  Your reply tells me you haven't read any of their documents or watched any of their videos.  The dead zone is in reference to no electromagnetic waste or noise from other sources (wifi, cell phone towers, etc).  In a dead zone, then it'll take much longer to recharge by the Schumann resonance frequencies alone.  In a zone with heavy electromagnetic noise, then it may only take 3 - 4 hours.  Taking up to 14 days to recharge isn't an outrageous claim as you falsely assert, LOL.  In fact, this shows the legitimacy of the device.

Gravock

[gravityblock]

Great! Where can I buy one of these autonomous household lamps? Do you have one, or know anyone that does?

As to the other claim of powering a 5 watt light source from thin air... where is your actual evidence for that?

I already provided you with the reference of them successfully powering light sources between 1 to 5 watts.  The flashlight is currently being sold with a 3 watt LED.  If TK can't do it, or if he can't imagine or understand how it can be done, then it's not possible to do.  According to TK, taking up to 14 days to recharge a flashlight through energy harvesting techniques is breaking the laws of physics and is similar to the thought process of those who said airplanes will never fly, the atomic bomb will never go off, bubble bees shouldn't be able to fly, etc....

Gravock

[MileHigh]

Your reply tells me you haven't read any of their documents or watched any of their videos.  The dead zone is in reference to no electromagnetic waste or noise from other sources (wifi, cell phone towers, etc).  In a dead zone, then it could take up to 14 days to recharge by the Schumann resonance frequencies alone.

Gravock

You are falling for this one hook, line and sinker.

You said this:

They did present a physical process, and that is energy harvesting.

You want to believe so hard that you are compromising your own common sense.  "Energy harvesting" is not a physical process, it's simply a generic term and without specifying what you are talking about it is meaningless.

Also this:

it could take up to 14 days to recharge by the Schumann resonance frequencies alone.

There is no such thing as harvesting power from the Schumann resonance, yet you want to believe.  Can you find any credible cases of harvesting power from the Schumann resonance?  I know it is discussed all the time on the forums as an idea, but it never goes further than that.

What is the physical reality of the Schumann resonance to a object at sea level anywhere on Earth?  Let's imagine something the size of a breadbox.

What does a breadbox sitting on the ground "see" with the respect to the Schumann resonance?

The answer is that it sees nothing, for all practical intents and purposes.  And nothing means nothing.

The concept of the Schumann resonance is used and abused on the free energy forums, and hence people pushing fake free energy propositions also use and abuse the concept of the Schumann resonance to make money.

Gravityblock:  Seriously, if you truly believe in extracting power from the Schumann resonance then I ask you to put forth a complete explanation, from "A" to "Z" for how that mechanism works.  I am honestly not expecting you to be able to do that, and if that's the case you need to take a step back and think about how you are dealing with this "free energy flashlight" proposition.

What I am sensing here is like that Keppe motor, or something like the false claims of the Keshe Foundation.

Caveat Emptor.

MileHigh