Tinman's coil shorting circuit

[shylo]

Does it matter which way a coil is wound?
If a CW coil sees a north field it creates a south opposing field , right?
If a CW coil sees a south field it creates a north opposing field right?
If the connections can be reversed at the right time , because CW and CCW are the same dependant on field, you should get assistance instead of opposition, right?
artv

[tinman]

Actually when external DC power supply is applied only to the rotor, its rotational direction can reverse at some loads applied to the stator.
Direction dependent on load - how do you like them apples?

Actually no.
No load placed on the stator coil(inductive,capacitive or resistive)or a combination of either will reverse the direction of the rotor. The only way to reverse the direction of the rotor is by altering the timing of the brushes. Even reversing the polarity to the rotor will not change the direction of the rotors rotation.

The question on how and why placing a load on the stator coil increases torque and RPM while reducing current draw to the RT is based around my first model dated back 2 1/2 - 3 years ago,where there is no embedded magnet in the stator core. that PM in the stator core is only to increase mechanical output and efficiency,and has nothing to do with the effect being created within the RT.

Hint
In a standard transformer you have two motions.
1-The flow of current
2-Moving/increasing,decreasing magnetic fields.
With the RT we add physical movement of mass.
As EMJ would say-Action/reaction/counter reaction.
So here we have created an imbalance within the system,where with a standard transformer you have restricted that imbalance by removing the physical motion of mass.

Rather than trying to lift your self off the ground by pulling on your own boot straps,you would be far better off putting your boot on some one else's foot and lifting.

[tinman]

Does it matter which way a coil is wound?
If a CW coil sees a north field it creates a south opposing field , right?
If a CW coil sees a south field it creates a north opposing field right?
If the connections can be reversed at the right time , because CW and CCW are the same dependant on field, you should get assistance instead of opposition, right?
artv

No.
No matter what way your coil is wound,it will always build an apposing field when a magnetic field approaches it,and an attracting field when a magnetic field is leaving it-->when that coil has a load placed on it of course

[Tito L. Oracion]

No.
No matter what way your coil is wound,it will always build an apposing field when a magnetic field approaches it,and an attracting field when a magnetic field is leaving it-->when that coil has a load placed on it of course

Good info.

[gyulasun]

...
The question on how and why placing a load on the stator coil increases torque and RPM while reducing current draw to the RT is based around my first model dated back 2 1/2 - 3 years ago,where there is no embedded magnet in the stator core. that PM in the stator core is only to increase mechanical output and efficiency,and has nothing to do with the effect being created within the RT.

Hint
In a standard transformer you have two motions.
1-The flow of current
2-Moving/increasing,decreasing magnetic fields.
With the RT we add physical movement of mass.
As EMJ would say-Action/reaction/counter reaction.
So here we have created an imbalance within the system,where with a standard transformer you have restricted that imbalance by removing the physical motion of mass.

Rather than trying to lift your self off the ground by pulling on your own boot straps,you would be far better off putting your boot on some one else's foot and lifting.

Hi Brad,

Thanks for the hints. 

So here we have created an imbalance within the system,where with a standard transformer you have restricted that imbalance by removing the physical motion of mass.

I would have two questions here:

1) Am I correct by saying that in your recent RT the created imbalance is further enhanced by disengaging the repel flux from the embedded magnet at the right moment?

2) Considering a solid state version for your recent RT,  the lack of the physical motion of mass would cause the same lack of imbalance, right? If yes, then have you found some 'tricks' to solve this, is it possible?

Thanks,
Gyula