Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Was the moon landing for real ???

Started by hartiberlin, October 16, 2006, 12:29:15 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Elvis Oswald

Atlas - if the camera was in the window filming the earth, then whose arm gets in the way?
Regardless of that - this was edited before broadcast.
The uncut video of the apollo astronauts - with time stamp - shows them faking the shot of being halfway to the moon.
You can see them shoot some with the earth shaped like an egg... then they try again and do a better job.  Then you see that they are far away from the window and that the "blue" color of the earth is actually light shining in the window.  There's one point on the film where the window is visible for an instant - you can plainly see the light shining in.  It's BLUE light... and that means it's the earth's atmosphere.

Sorry - but an edited broadcast does not trump video with timestamp that shows them faking the shot and then plainly showing bright blue sky outside the window.

Apollo 11 was fake.  The proof is there.  I take the reaction of the others has proof that their missions were fake as well.  And why not fake all of them?

How many people needed to be involved?  Not many.  The signal from the missions came to earth and was recorded by one of three stations - and then it was broadcast to another government facility before it was relayed to mission control.
Only the astronauts, and whoever was monitoring the signal to catch any giveaways would have to know.

Nixon shut it all down.  They had stolen $$ from the taxpayers and given them nothing.

It's no secret that Nixon was Prescott Bush's boy... and that Prescott was part of a plot to overthrow our government here and institute fascism.  He helped Hitler during WWII.
Eisenhower warned of the military industrial complex.  Do you think he was a nut too?  Who do you think he was talking about?
He was talking about Prescott Bush and others... and I'm sure he knew Nixon was part of it.

So would they kill JFK... steal money by faking the moon landing... fake the cold war and the war on terror to steal more money and to erase the constitution?
Damn right they would.

And it's the same people. The Bush Krime Family. 

Cheney and Rumsfield and Kissinger and Bill and Hillary and GHWB and GWB - all thugs, all nazis, all new world order scum.


shruggedatlas

Quote from: Elvis Oswald on October 29, 2007, 02:13:19 PM
Atlas - if the camera was in the window filming the earth, then whose arm gets in the way?
Regardless of that - this was edited before broadcast.
The uncut video of the apollo astronauts - with time stamp - shows them faking the shot of being halfway to the moon.
You can see them shoot some with the earth shaped like an egg... then they try again and do a better job.  Then you see that they are far away from the window and that the "blue" color of the earth is actually light shining in the window.  There's one point on the film where the window is visible for an instant - you can plainly see the light shining in.  It's BLUE light... and that means it's the earth's atmosphere.

Sorry - but an edited broadcast does not trump video with timestamp that shows them faking the shot and then plainly showing bright blue sky outside the window.

Apollo 11 was fake.  The proof is there.  I take the reaction of the others has proof that their missions were fake as well.  And why not fake all of them?

How many people needed to be involved?  Not many.  The signal from the missions came to earth and was recorded by one of three stations - and then it was broadcast to another government facility before it was relayed to mission control.
Only the astronauts, and whoever was monitoring the signal to catch any giveaways would have to know.

Nixon shut it all down.  They had stolen $$ from the taxpayers and given them nothing.

It's no secret that Nixon was Prescott Bush's boy... and that Prescott was part of a plot to overthrow our government here and institute fascism.  He helped Hitler during WWII.
Eisenhower warned of the military industrial complex.  Do you think he was a nut too?  Who do you think he was talking about?
He was talking about Prescott Bush and others... and I'm sure he knew Nixon was part of it.

So would they kill JFK... steal money by faking the moon landing... fake the cold war and the war on terror to steal more money and to erase the constitution?
Damn right they would.

And it's the same people. The Bush Krime Family. 

Cheney and Rumsfield and Kissinger and Bill and Hillary and GHWB and GWB - all thugs, all nazis, all new world order scum.



You forgot to mention the part about how Truman's administration lied about the Holocaust and how NASA is still lying to us about the Earth being round.  Dude, you are beyond help - you'll believe anything as long as it makes the government look bad.  Go on and believe whatever you want.  Good luck making your way in the world, and get some good tinfoil - you'll need it.

devilzangel

There is obvious evidence man has been on the moon; but there is no definite evidence this occurred on the first trip. In fact there is evidence to the contrary; that the first trip was a fake. Trips afterwards (maybe not all of them) to the moon are real; because, by then secret orgs within the govt already knew of antigrav and had already reverse engineered the dang things; shoot, there is a good chance the govt had went to the moon even before the Apollo missions. It is a definite fact that NASA (along with its contractors) has been doctoring images available to the public for decades. No point in pretending when NASA and secret govt orgs are already doing this for us.I don't have a long neck and I hate playing ostrich. NASA and other collaborators cant hide or lie anymore when so many insiders are coming out and spilling the beans.

@ shruggedatlas, i dont think any serious reliable insider or researcher has ever said that ALL moon missions were faked. Remote viewing was also used to map out and confirm alien presence and structures on the moon. There is a good chance that these "aliens" have been on the Moon and Earth for a very long time. Who knows .. only time will tell.

devilzangel
..

hartiberlin

So,
was the Van Allan belt still so strong, that the radiation would
have killed every astronaut over there going through it ?

What about the Mars probes which went through the Van Allan belt ?
Were they better protected against the radiation ?

Okay, no human on board there,
so what is the latest word on the
Van Allan belt ?
Could it be passed in 1969 already with the small
thickness steel ? capsules of the Saturn rockets ?
without killing the astronauts ?

I still believe that all moon landings were faked.

The moon landing capsules was much too unstable to land
at all on the moon.
This was already shown earlier with tests on earth...
it tilted back and forth and never made a stable landing...
had to be hold on strings to get it back safely to the gound...
Stefan Hartmann, Moderator of the overunity.com forum

shruggedatlas

Quote from: hartiberlin on October 30, 2007, 01:52:18 AM
So,
was the Van Allan belt still so strong, that the radiation would
have killed every astronaut over there going through it ?

What about the Mars probes which went through the Van Allan belt ?
Were they better protected against the radiation ?

Okay, no human on board there,
so what is the latest word on the
Van Allan belt ?
Could it be passed in 1969 already with the small
thickness steel ? capsules of the Saturn rockets ?
without killing the astronauts ?

I still believe that all moon landings were faked.

The moon landing capsules was much too unstable to land
at all on the moon.
This was already shown earlier with tests on earth...
it tilted back and forth and never made a stable landing...
had to be hold on strings to get it back safely to the gound...

Regarding the Van Allen Belt, here is what the Wikipedia has to say:

"Solar cells, integrated circuits, and sensors can be damaged by radiation. In 1962, the Van Allen belts were temporarily amplified by a high-altitude nuclear explosion (the Starfish Prime test) and several satellites ceased operation. Geomagnetic storms occasionally damage electronic components on spacecraft. Miniaturization and digitization of electronics and logic circuits have made satellites more vulnerable to radiation, as incoming ions may be as large as the circuit's charge. Electronics on satellites must be hardened against radiation to operate reliably. The Hubble Space Telescope, among other satellites, often has its sensors turned off when passing through regions of intense radiation."

It seems like the Van Allen belts can cause harm to certain electronics under certain circumstances.  Why do you believe it is fatal to human beings?

On the moon landings, why would they fake it six times?  On one hand we have tons evidence from six separate moon missions - video transmissions, photographs, audio recordings, moon rocks, and of course the testimony of hundreds.  On the other hand we have your opinion that NASA's best engineers were never able to solve the landing problem.  How do you know they never solved it?  Just because we have videos of failures does not mean success was never achieved.