Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


A Perspective On The B Type EESD - Robert Murray-Smith - Any issues?

Started by MileHigh, November 29, 2015, 04:51:35 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

tinman

Quote from: poynt99 on July 09, 2016, 10:09:20 AM
What is the challenge? Here's one:

1) 1.5V bench power source (not a battery)
2) 3 LED's (of agreed upon part number) in series.
3) The challenge: Light the 3 LED's with a circuit powered off the 1.5V supply. Correctly measure the input power (Pin from source) and output power (Pout power (total) dissipated by the 3 LED's). The highest Pout/Pin ratio wins.

Caveats:

a) The frequency of operation must be between 1kHz and 100kHz.
b) Total Pout (all 3 LEDs combined) must be 60mW minimum (greater than 60mW is fine).

My understanding is that itsu would offer his services as builder and tester for any circuit MH would come up with to go against Brad's circuit.

Sounds like fun :)


I have to ask though,why would it matter what LEDs we use,if we are measuring the power being delivered to them?.


Brad

poynt99

Quote from: MileHigh on July 09, 2016, 10:31:29 AM
That all sounds fine and dandy except for the fact that if I wanted to do it I would need to work on a bench to iterate on a design.  Since I have no bench and no desire to do it, it's not going to happen.  I can't just put something on paper without testing it and iterating on it myself.

However, I admire the way you formulated the challenge, it makes great sense.  Something similar should be done for a pulse motor build-off to make it more interesting.  Or what you just stated is perfect for a Joule Thief build-off.

MileHigh

You could always simulate a design.

The design can be anything by the way; one of your own, something from an application note from Linear Technology, something COTS off ebay, you name it. Perhaps itsu has an idea of his own, and you two could collaborate on it?
question everything, double check the facts, THEN decide your path...

Simple Cheap Low Power Oscillators V2.0
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=248
Towards Realizing the TPU V1.4: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=217
Capacitor Energy Transfer Experiments V1.0: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=209

poynt99

Quote from: tinman on July 09, 2016, 10:39:27 AM
I have to ask though,why would it matter what LEDs we use,if we are measuring the power being delivered to them?.


Brad
To make it more fair, controlled, and comparable, the source and load should be the same. Different LEDs have different forward voltages etc., and using a different forward voltage might give an efficiency advantage.
question everything, double check the facts, THEN decide your path...

Simple Cheap Low Power Oscillators V2.0
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=248
Towards Realizing the TPU V1.4: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=217
Capacitor Energy Transfer Experiments V1.0: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=209

tinman

Quote from: MileHigh on July 09, 2016, 10:31:29 AM


However, I admire the way you formulated the challenge, it makes great sense.  Something similar should be done for a pulse motor build-off to make it more interesting.  Or what you just stated is perfect for a Joule Thief build-off.

MileHigh

QuoteThat all sounds fine and dandy except for the fact that if I wanted to do it I would need to work on a bench to iterate on a design.  Since I have no bench and no desire to do it, it's not going to happen.  I can't just put something on paper without testing it and iterating on it myself.

MH

I have to say that i do understand what you have stated above,but at the same time,i am a little confused. Was it not you that stated that the pen was mightier than the bench?,but now you say you need the bench before you can put pen to paper ???

Anyway-Poynt
That challenge seems to good to let go to waste.
How about we make it a forum challenge?--where you join in as well ;)
Going by your parameters of the challenge,we are looking for the most efficient boost converter to run 3 LED's-yes?.


Brad

tinman

Quote from: poynt99 on July 09, 2016, 10:44:32 AM
To make it more fair, controlled, and comparable, the source and load should be the same. Different LEDs have different forward voltages etc., and using a different forward voltage might give an efficiency advantage.

Fair enough.
I only hope that i can get the LEDs you choose--maybe those big 10mm ones,although i have a heap of the 5mm ones from solar garden lights. ?

Brad