Self Sustaining Electricity Generator

[NRamaswami]

Hi

I am very confused. In Figuera priciple the first thing  that is avoided is motion. I have followed it to the dot. I getutput only when opposote poles are involved. It is a totallymotionless core. No output when secondary  is placed between identical poles.

Experimentally verified. No mechanical motion is involved in Figuera concept which I have further simplified.

sorry I am unable to get identical poles working.

Ramaswami

[NRamaswami]

Dare Diamond and All I think Hanon is closing his thread..

I have alredady received advice to forget this stuff.. See reply No 3140 & 3141 in Hanon thread..

Earlier Dieter and others including Hanon agreed no output between identical poles.. why he changed was not clear to me but is clear now..
I will write one long post tomorrow as to why and how I got in to this..
I think I will have to keep quiet now..sorry about that..

Regards

Ramaswami

[darediamond]

In one Free to Energy Base document I read, opposing poles is what was mentioned to give Real Output in all the named Overunity devices. So Ramaswami claim is True.

[sm0ky2]

in the solenoid test:

first example:   S<------------------>N   
                            (N-------------S)
The steel rod forms a single di-pole magnet, opposing the permanent magnets.

second example:  S<---------------------->S
                               (N-----S)(S------N)

The steel rod forms two di-pole magnets, opposing the permanent magnets,
   AND opposing itself as a (3rd) pole manifesting near the center of the rod.

You can see the polarity switching on the meter in the video.

[hanon]

Just for clarifying and naming me: power is extracted  between same poles if the magnetic lines collide and are moved back and forth. Therefore you need the Figuera commutator described in the 1908 to create the two unphased signals. TWO signals are required. With AC (one signal) both inducers has always the same magnetic strength, and the magnetic lines do not move, therefore no output. AC was used in the 1902 patent, not in the 1908 patent.

Same poles configuration needs the 1908 commutator and its two signals. Your problem is using AC with same poles configuration. You never understood the commutator and you still do not understand the real function of the commutator. But I do not want to interfere more in this thread. It is just because you named me. I do not have any thread, so dont call it my thread. It is a thread about designs based closely to the designs described in the  patent.

Figuera did what is shown in the video posted before but instead of moving the coils he just moved the fields. As there was no movement of the coils, there was no force opposing the movement, because there is no movement. As simple as that.  For designs based on the simple electromagnets and coil described in Figuera's patents the other thread is the place to post. For Ramaswami device and other designs it is better to post in this thread.