Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Is The Earth A Flat Round Disc or Is It a Round Spherical Globe?

Started by gravityblock, April 28, 2016, 12:14:07 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Is The Earth A Flat Round Disc, Concave, or Is It a Round Spherical Globe?

The earth is a flat round disc!
The earth is a flat round disc with a dome!
The earth is a round speriical globe!
The earth is concave!

MileHigh

TK:

Here is one of the bigger hoaxes:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tq02C_3FvFo

All of that CGI and the remote clandestine detonations of dynamite are pretty impressive.  Or perhaps the great giant sky man-thing was smoking and he flicked his cigarette and some ash and a hot ember punched its way through the skin of the dome or something.  All I know is that he/she/it better not sneeze when looking at us up close because that would be Armageddon.  He spilled some of his glass of water on us a long time ago and you know what happened then.

MileHigh

tinman

Quote from: ramset on May 07, 2016, 07:47:15 AM
Evidence ?



as we are well aware Nowadays it means absolutely nothing to see a vid or picture .

@ Bill
Yes I was in the "white room" at Gruman and saw with my own eyes the Modules being built
and lived amongst hundreds of thousands whose entire existence and lifestyle
Fed on the space  programs .

Some folks always need to See with their own eyes !!

@ Farmhand
that was funny ...

QuoteHas anyone here actually Seen the Debris left behind on the moon thru a telescope ?
or spoken with someone at an observatory who has or can see the remains ?

the tracks and footprints left behind would be good to see also .

No,not one clear picture-unless you call some white dots on a !so called! HD picture proof.

It is odd that we can send very clear pictures all the way from mars to earth,and spend the money to do so,but cannot !in anyway! gain access to such clear pictures of the !left behinds! on the moon. Even NASA scientist them self have stated that they still have to work out how to get man safely through the Van Allan belt's--a slip up there i expect.

The only evidence available that man went to the moon,is of course from NASA.
The chinese -along with a couple of other countries,have landed lunar rovers on the moon,and still,not one clear shot of any of the left overs from the Apollo missions-not one.

We can take a picture of a guy taking a leak in his back yard from over 400 miles up--through the atmosphere mind you,but not one clear picture from the LRO at just 25 mile up from the moons surface with not atmosphere to contend with either :o

No man since the !!Apollo!! missions has been anywhere near the Van Allan belts-wonder why that is?.
No man has been back to the moon since the !!Apollo!! missions-wonder why that is?.
No clear pictures of any of the equipment left behind on the moon,by any country-wonder why that is?.

I guess !some! of us will believe anything the government tells us,as the truth would just hurt to much ;)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QXt6n33gOfo

Brad



ramset

Brad
you know its really not that hard to get to Space these days , and the Moon isn't really that Far away ...

it won't be too long before somebody gets something in orbit at the moon .

someone like this maybe ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDoh8zQDT38&feature=youtu.be

at 3800 MPH it would not take long at all, and since the moon isn't spinning the rocket could just be sent to one of the locations where the Modules are and send back pics until it reaches its destination ??

Whats for yah ne're go bye yah
Thanks Grandma

tinman

Quote from: ramset on May 07, 2016, 11:43:54 AM
Brad
you know its really not that hard to get to Space these days , and the Moon isn't really that Far away ...

it won't be too long before somebody gets something in orbit at the moon .

someone like this maybe ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDoh8zQDT38&feature=youtu.be

at 3800 MPH it would not take long at all, and since the moon isn't spinning the rocket could just be sent to one of the locations where the Modules are and send back pics until it reaches its destination ??

The American government will never allow another country thats not in the American governments pocket,or any private company to send a rocket to the moon to take pictures of the equipment left behind from the Apollo missions-never. Anyone that tries will find that there space craft will malfunction ,and explode before it gets there.

The moon landings are as believable as the 9/11 story. As an American,it may be hard to see,due to loving your country--blind is love some times. But from an outsiders point of view,you can clearly see that something is drastically wrong with the 9/11 story.

If you believe the 9/11 story,then you must also believe that the American defence force is the poorest in the world,when it claims to be the best. The department of Intelligence also seems not so intelligent.

I in no way believe in the !flat! earth theory,but i do laugh at some of the things people do believe--just because the government and media says thats how it is.

A well worth while video to watch.
But of course,the experts in this video will all be wrong,as we have better ones here ;)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xif0jIT_ZM

Brad

TinselKoala

Another "fake" event scheduled for Monday morning through mid-day in the Northern Hemisphere:
http://www.accuweather.com/en/features/trend/dig_out_the_binoculars_mercury_transit_to_occur_monday_where_when_to_see_it/57206396
QuoteTransits of Mercury have long helped astronomers since viewing the event for the first time in 1631. In addition to providing a better understanding of the planet's disk size and the distance between the Earth and sun, transits now allow NASA to test their spacecraft and calibrate their instruments.

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/satellites-to-see-mercury-enter-spotlight-on-may-9


An article from 2008 talking about satellites orbiting the moon at that time, including satellites from China, Japan, India, and Russia and of course USA:
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2008/20feb_orbitingthemoon/

Of course.... all fake, right! Very clever of NASA to get all those other nations to be in on the hoax. Why, there must be billions of people who actually think that the Moon is really up in outer space and that humans send spacecraft there! What a bunch of fools!

A very detailed article about the Van Allen belts and the lunar spaceflights, including trajectory maps that show how the Apollo missions skirted most of the radiation zones going and coming back:
http://www.braeunig.us/apollo/VABraddose.htm
QuoteIn fact, Dr. Van Allen helped to design the Apollo lunar trajectories, which were engineered specifically to lessen radiation exposure. Despite the conspiracists' insistence that Dr. Van Allen agrees with them, he has rejected the claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts, calling it "nonsense".
---
No other spacefaring nation has expresses doubts about the ability to traverse translunar space, and they all acknowledge that Apollo succeeded in landing astronauts on the Moon. Furthermore, the United States is not the only nation to have sent living creatures to the Moon. In September 1968 the Soviet Union's Zond 5 became the first spacecraft to swing around the Moon and return to land on Earth. The mission was planned as a precursor to a manned lunar spacecraft. It carried a biological payload of two Russian tortoises, wine flies, meal worms, plants, seeds, bacteria, and other living matter. The biological payload was intact, proving that it was possible to survive a lunar flight and safely return to Earth. As a result of Zond 5, and Zond 7 in 1969, the Soviet Union concluded that, "seven-day flights along the trajectories of Zond-5 and 7 probes are safe from the radiation point of view."

Read on down through the math to the calculations of the radiation doses on the trajectories followed, and descriptions of the shielding the spacecraft afforded. And the article ends with the average readings from the actual dosimeters worn by the astronauts:
http://www.braeunig.us/apollo/pics/apollodose.gif


Of course... all this data is just a fabric of lies, isn't it, because you KNOW we never went to the moon and nothing will change your mind.