Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



H2 to 2H - what are the options?

Started by dieter, June 04, 2016, 04:11:31 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

pomodoro

Prof Malgarini, before this chap spends time and money, does your device actually work or is it an untested invention?
Personally I'd use a glow discharge is a metal tube. The metal will act ad a catalyst for the recombination. All this placed in a adiabatic calorimeter for heat measurements. A fair bit of work to get it right.

franco malgarini


ourbobby

Quote from: franco malgarini on June 05, 2016, 02:57:00 AM
You can use magnets:

Hello Franco,
                    Your drawing is not that clear to me. Is it necessary to pulse the magnets or pulse the charge across the plates? Or both or only one of either? I think magnets, if strong enough can influence the Lorenze force of the current, and can cause an increase in efficiency of output and also create directional current flows within the dissociation chamber. We could be talking >3.0T as a requirement for stationary magnets. Neodymium are only 1.9T, and iron cored coils will not exceed 2.3T.

Are your magnets the dark circular items in your photo?

Thanks

franco malgarini


Photomagnetolysis is better , simple and economical:

4 magnets  80 euro
plexiglass    20 euro
china laser   20 euro

Total  120 euro

All can build it...

ourbobby

Quote from: franco malgarini on June 08, 2016, 09:40:46 AM
Photomagnetolysis is better , simple and economical:

4 magnets  80 euro
plexiglass    20 euro
china laser   20 euro

Total  120 euro

All can build it...

Hello Franco,
                    That's what I like to see -Optimism. I think, a few simple pencil sketches, reminiscent of my early artistic attempts is not enough to encourage multiple attempts with your wondrous device. You have left out the time and effort trying to work out the configuration of the device. Perhaps, if you provided a clearer explanation of your intentions, we could then try to replicate and confirm workability. Constantly just supplying references to other sources that end in the deep pit of obscurity is not a design brief for your wondrous device.

You need to provide a tangible design that can be readily understood complete with any specific circuitry. At present what I see is magnets in the wrong direction, where I might expect that the Lorenze force would be part of the final concept for dissociation, given its ability to thrust electrons during the dissociation process. and intimations of tubes and chinese patent references that no-one seems to be able to locate: which, incidentally looks like it might be MHD based.

Thanks