A PLACE FOR DEBATE

[Freedomfuel]

Deleted

[Vortex1]

deleted

[Grumpy]

With SM's mention of supersonic flight - I am leaning more towards "cavitation" and "shock waves" - both can be created electromagneticly.

Magnetrons cavitate.

"soundwaves leaving the aircraft pile up on each other, similar to a tailback on a road, and a shock wave forms, the pressure increases, and then spreads out sideways. Because of this amplification effect, a shock wave is very intense, more like an explosion when you hear it (not coincidentally, since explosions create shock waves).

Particles accelerated beyond the speed of light in a refractive medium (where the speed of light is less than that in a vacuum, such as water) create visible x, a phenomenon known as Cherenkov radiation - which may be outside visible spectrum.

More later...

[allcanadian]

Why does everything need to be so complicated? There always has to be some fantastical process or mystery particle involved, Why can't it be simple?
Here's a thought get a sim like vizimag, draw a toroid in an external field(north=top to south=bottom),what do you see? You see the external field lines(Earth field?) bend too each side of the toroid because the flux flows easier through iron(yes iron). So the external field lines bending through and around the circle look just like the flowlines of air travelling around a circle? sound familiar?
And if on the left side of the toroid(West) a coil produced a magnetic field moving upwards(North) what would happen? All of the external field would be diverted to the right side(East) plus the coil field. When the coil field turned off the external field plus the imarted field would try to equalize,overshooting back to the left side of the toroid(resonance).
All within the physics we know, no unprovable fanasy theories needed.

[Grumpy]

it is actually pretty simple.  No fancy particles are discussed. 

Orthogonal magnetic fields can be independent.  Induction is not considered to occur between orthogonal coils.  You can have to orthogonal coils on the same core and excite each coil independently - this does increase the amount of flux that the material will accept before saturation.  While all of this is interesting and useful, the fields are conservative and you will not achieve OU.

Very much information is in the videos and the answers will be found if you look for them.

For example, the magnetic field of the earth is not the simple bar magnet that everyone thinks of.

I recommed that you Google up the work of "Albert Roy Davis and Walter Rawls" with magnets, electromagnets, and the Earth's magnetic field.

Much interesting information such as this:
 

Magnetism HAS A  FREQUENCY.   It  also  has  motion.   The  rate  of vibration depends on  the  size,  length, width, and  power  of  the magnet.  Solid state  composition  magnets,  such as metal, iron and steel, are CONSTANT in their rate  of  vibration  DEPENDING on their structure.  An electromagnet,  however,  may  present  a  number  of different types of vibrations.

However, a coil  wound  a  certain  number  of turns has a different frequency from a fixed metal or composition  magnet.   As  the  coil heats, the resistance  to  the flow of current INCREASES.   Here  we have a SLOW DROP in magnetic lines, or cables, of force to a RISE IN FORCE, depending upon   the   wire   and  core  materials  used  for construction.  Therefore, the    vibrations    supplied    by    the electromagnet are NOT  AS  CONSTANT  as  those  from  the  metal  or composition magnet.

They claim that magnetic poles have completely opposite effects, including spin direction. (Just like Walter Russell showed.)

See below for images from their book "Magneitsm and it's effect on living systems":