TinMan's "Over Faraday HV HHO production"

[Magluvin]

Okay since you want to get on world events then what about this ice shelf that just broke off into the ocean that is larger than Delaware? How do you suppose that is going to effect the ocean's currents dumping all of that fresh water into the ocean? My basic argument is why worry about something that is out of your control?


So, in this context I don't actually understand your argument other than being posted just for the sake of arguing as you pointed to things that are out of our control and we can really do nothing about. Sure co2 is good for plants but we live in balance with these plants as we put out co2 and plants put out o2, however plants don't like co, or any NOx gases and that is something we can work towards solving with this technology.

Well we look at different data. The ice is going to melt. That is the time line in history.  The elitists want to cash in on it saying we can make the difference. Its going to happen no matter what we do. There are many more dire problems they should be dealing with like what to do about all the nuke plants that are out of date and how to really get rid of the waste materials.

If you look into indoor growing, in japan they pull 1000 heads of lettuce a day off of indoor spiral farming. And the pot industry, they use co2 tanks to get the plants to grow at much faster rates than in the outdoors. So I cant agree that we are near a point that outdoor co2 is bad for plants. But those plants are converting that co2 to make oxygen.

Mags

[h20power]

Well we look at different data. The ice is going to melt. That is the time line in history.  The elitists want to cash in on it saying we can make the difference. Its going to happen no matter what we do. There are many more dire problems they should be dealing with like what to do about all the nuke plants that are out of date and how to really get rid of the waste materials.

If you look into indoor growing, in japan they pull 1000 heads of lettuce a day off of indoor spiral farming. And the pot industry, they use co2 tanks to get the plants to grow at much faster rates than in the outdoors. So I cant agree that we are near a point that outdoor co2 is bad for plants. But those plants are converting that co2 to make oxygen.

Mags

You seem to have a problem reading what I wrote as our primary problem is we are converting far more o2 into something else with the use of fossil fuels than the plants can put out. The oxygen levels are dropping for as pf now we are actually under 21%. When I wrote co that stands for carbon monoxide, NOx stand for nitrogen monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, nitrogen trioxide plants don't really like these gases. Here is a short article on the dropping oxygen levels so we can be on the same page: http://scrippso2.ucsd.edu/  Now Meyer spoke about this problem in some of his lecture videos as he too could see that all of these fuels we are burning are taking more oxygen out of our atmosphere than the plants can put in it. We are no longer in equilibrium with nature due to the use of these fossil fuels. Now I hear you about what to do with all of this radioactive waste but we have to tackle one problem at a time. It is possible that this technology also holds the key to turning radioactive waste into a nonreactive substance but I am not their yet in my understanding of this technology.


So, as I stated Tinman is now creating something to further deplete our oxygen levels which is heading in the wrong direction. Sure it looks nice and probably puts on a great show but if it's end result is to take away oxygen from our breathable air supply it's heading in the wrong direction. When you think of any technology that will be used to replace the use of fossil fuels you have to think on a global scale. Solar, wind, geothermal, and a few other technologies out there plus Meyer's technology have the power to create energy without using up any oxygen in our air supply. These are the types of technologies we need to take over the use of fossil fuels, and the use of any Nuclear power plant usage. In fact the entire grid system also needs to be done away with as that is part of the elites energy enslavement system for it truly severs no other purpose.


When I look at these types of disruptive technologies I look at them in a global use scale and ask; What impact will it have if it is put into mass use? What type of waste products will it leave? Are the materials used a finite resource or are they renewable? Will the use of the technology serve to improve the lives of humanity or make things worse?
You see I'm a big picture type of guy and I tend to ask the right questions for I remember well what Meyer said in telling us, "We must learn to ask the right questions." Plus I had a lot of help from my college professors of old, plus my father and mother. This water for fuel technology is the best fit for replacing the use of fossil fuels for the entire globe as it is non polluting, makes use of some renewable materials, and it's source of fuel is really only borrowed as it doesn't consume the water it uses as you start off with water and you end up with water.


So, I hope this clears things up as to why I don't like this new direction Tinman is taking as to me it is a non-viable solution to the problems this world is facing. Now looking on the bright side, "You never know unless you try."

[profitis]

"It
is possible that this technology also holds the key to
turning radioactive waste into a nonreactive
substance"

Ina flash yes

[pomodoro]

A chemist of your caliber knows better than that Dr. Profits, 

No MIB for this one, oxidation of the Carbon to CO adds energy.
Carbon is a fuel.  Still looks like a good experiment when Tinman gets to power the sucker.  Should work with AC only as there is no electrolysis.  Tungsten rods are probably next on list.

[tinman]

Here is a quick first run of the reactor.
It is consuming the small rods quite fast,but i believe that the rods are of poor quality.

This is running on an AC- around 11 amps at 34-36 volts.
It is producing about 3LPM of raw gas-not dried-so an MMW of 8.02 

The new,larger reactor is already under construction.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWCFNt3Tu_I


Brad