Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



TinMan's "Over Faraday HV HHO production"

Started by ramset, November 20, 2016, 04:28:24 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

h20power

Can I ask you a question Tinman, Why did you give up on Meyer's technology and start pursuing this carbon rod thing you are doing right now?

tinman

Quote from: h20power on July 21, 2017, 05:43:35 PM
Can I ask you a question Tinman, Why did you give up on Meyer's technology and start pursuing this carbon rod thing you are doing right now?

There are a few reasons h20power.

The gas produced by carbon arc is much safer to store,and no flashbacks into bubblers-and the likes,as we are using an alternating current.

The energy value in the form of heat (heating water)is easy to calculate,and also put to good use.

And also a large amount of light is given off at the same time.

The bulk of what is left after the gas is burnt,is water and oxygen.


Brad

h20power

Quote from: tinman on July 21, 2017, 06:28:17 PM
There are a few reasons h20power.

The gas produced by carbon arc is much safer to store,and no flashbacks into bubblers-and the likes,as we are using an alternating current.

The energy value in the form of heat (heating water)is easy to calculate,and also put to good use.

And also a large amount of light is given off at the same time.

The bulk of what is left after the gas is burnt,is water and oxygen.


Brad


With Meyer's technology there is no safer way to store the hydrogen and oxygen than in the form of water itself. The technology doesn't produce any waste heat in the water bath and uses pulse DC from a DC power supply on the primary side. On the secondary side the voltage use on the water capacitor is AC but I guess you would already know that having read the pdf file I put out titled, "The Voltage Dissociation of Water." Meyer's quenching circuit technology makes for the safe transport of the mixed gases as it prevents any flashbacks from occurring. The gases are never stored but used at the point of consumption when needed. Using standard safety protocols making use of Meyer's technology is almost as easy as 123.
This technology doesn't have any products that are used up and really only barrows the water as the water itself is not consumed. When it comes to power generation this technology has no equal which is why I am confused by your giving up on it. Plus there is no need to do any peer review studies as the patents are already in the public domain. All that any of us that figure out how to get it working need do is start putting it to use in any area of business we choose to put it to use for.
Your going to be going up against Meyer's technology with this technology you are working on and you have to prove it safe to powers that be, find some way to prevent them from blocking you on making it, and figure out just what market you will be trying to get into. All I need to do is put Meyer's technology to use without all of that red tape. But a better question for you is how long do you expect to go from the prototype stage to being able to go into mass production with your technology? If you have no plan to go into mass production and only plan on Open Sourcing the technology then you are asking everyone to build what is known as a "One Off" which is the most costly way of making anything and you will have no assurances that those whom give your technology a try will not inadvertently kill themselves by not following instructions correctly.


On the other hand True Green Solutions will be putting Meyer's technology to work for the masses in a safe usable product that will be mass produced for affordability. I am not going to disclose where the company is heading right now but you will know once the products hit the marketplace. Sorry to see you toss in the towel like this but I know this technology is a tough nut to crack as it has taken me many years to figure out how to get it working correctly and I still don't have all the answers yet. My hope is when my company does go to market with this technology you and the others of these many forums will give this technology your full support. Can I count on you?

tinman

Well here is the first run of the PlazArc V2.

Two explosions,due to me not keeping an eye on the water level in the reactor chamber--oh well lol.

Problem been fixed,and some mods being made.

Next video up tonight,of a longer run--hopefully.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ycGMglPdgU


Brad

profitis

"Well here is the first run of the PlazArc V2.
Two explosions,due to me not keeping an eye on the
water level in the reactor chamber--oh well lol."

Auuw tinman keep up the good work. so long as u got the concept correct its jus a matter of experiment and time