GEM=(Geometrical Electricity Multiplication)

[AlienGrey]

"thereby multiplying your AC electricity"

no multipling frequency .... to power what ?   USA runs on 50hz

" (the small pulleys do not take any torque to rotate, as they are just winding up massive voltage, as it only needs to generate one spark,(practically zero) of current)= to drive your input DC motor"

DC motors dont run on "sparks"  , is a spark an electrical quantity ?
a spark across a gap is current , practically NOT zero , have you seen commutator bars and brushes after there has been "sparks" ?


one_christian_warrior / that_prophet   ,  the devils got ya in the head and you wont wake up

The thing is if a highly efficient motor fed from an efficient friction less balanced dynamo might just work with a battery to charge in the circuit if the friction was almost eliminated to less than the charging gain.

The other thing Jesus wasn't a christian he was a Rabbi and any way it's just a title, and none of the biblical names exist it was all made up by the Emperor of the time and the Pope Sylvester and further God is short for Gadre'el who in the book of Honoc is Satan's real name, infarct the bible king James has over 260 errors !  from the original Arabic Hebrew scriptures, which are the oldest know written on local reed parchment to within AD30,  so if you worship god it could be the wrong guy.  Just thought i wold point out the truth for once 

[massive]

buddah wasnt a buddhist


http://www.energyscienceforum.com/showthread.php?t=1770

no mention of where one will find a DC motor that operates on a spark

http://free-energy-info.co.uk/Chapt19.html   this has been around a long time .

its great skywatcher is going to whack together a bike gen but is prophet going to learn from it?

[ramset]

who's really running the show ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21FXqEWObLA&list=TLGGmacxG9RTarcyMzAxMjAxNw

and Todays Google image results from Antarctica

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTM19wewp3w

warming is melting away ice which Hid  old secrets ??

[sm0ky2]

L Ron Hubbard wasn't a Scientologist
In fact he even went so far as telling people that it was
Complete b.s. Before he wrote it...
But they believe it anyways


That's the thing about gods unicorns and perpetual motion
They are just as hard to disprove as they are to prove...


Sure you can easily make a poorly designed "ou" motor
And prove that yours does not work
You could even provide evidence and theory about why
It can't work


But at the end of the day we are surrounded by forces that
Create lava, ice, tornados, and lightning
Why on earth are we trying to build an "isolated system"??
I think these physicists are trying to pull a fast one on us

[Temporal Visitor]

You will discover, Skywatcher, what you probably already know, and what our "prophet" apparently doesn't: it does indeed take some torque to rotate the generator's pulley, and the higher the voltage output the more torque it takes. And the more generators you have, the more power you need to input from the drive motor to turn the big wheel. This is what people have been trying to explain to "that prophet" for many years in at least 14 different threads.

In fact anyone who remembers riding their 10-speed bike with a generator for the headlight knows this: when you flip the generator down to contact the wheel, the bike becomes harder to pedal. Add a bunch more generators and you will eventually get to the point where you can't pedal at all because the drag caused by generating electricity is too great.

The story about someone getting this to "work" can only be true for certain limited definitions of "work". For sure, there is no such system that is self-sustaining, and to claim that there is.... well, coming from someone who professes to be a Christian, the claim is very sad to read. It has the same connection to reality as my claim that I have a herd of invisible pink unicorns in my backyard. Not only do I not provide any evidence for my unlikely claim... it would also violate local zoning ordinances.   

Now if you will excuse me I have to go feed the unicorns.

TK: "the higher the voltage output the more torque it takes." is IN REALITY a flawed statement, though I am certain you know the difference and meant to write current output or power output or wattage output - rather than "voltage output". Right?

Otherwise however, in general you are correct about this system which that_profit continues to insist will function, but IN REALITY does not.

It does not work as presented for many well understood reasons; BUT it does IN FACT shed a scintilla of light on one of several necessary requirements I am aware of in the design of systems that can self-sustain .

In a system intended to self-sustain:
There needs to be a voltage differential in order to be able to effect _a _c _c _e _l _e _r _a _t _i _o _n!

Will you tell everyone: What happens (that neither of us can stop) when any Matter is accelerated?

Please

Michael