GEM=(Geometrical Electricity Multiplication)

[Low-Q]

I bet my balls that he will repeat his post any time soon.


Vidar

[that_prophet]

.   This works, http://free-energy.yolasite.com/ because of the simple mathematics of how a large pulley of 10 cm circumference does not cost 10 times more energy to rotate than a 1 cm circumference min-pulley. Yet the 10 cm of belt off of the large pulley can rotate a 1 cm mini-pulley 10 times, giving you 10 cycles of AC electricity. Now, try to tell me that 1 spark=short burst of DC current is equal to 10 cycles of AC electricity. WHY = you have just used pulley mechanics to multiply AC electricity by 10 + if you only add 3 more mini-pulleys to the same belt, like in my diagram, you can change your multiplication factor from 10 to 40. So that's 40 cycles of AC electricity that you have multiplied from one mere spark of DC current. You MUST be multiplying your electricity with this simple GEM = (Geographical Electricity Multiplier) free energy pulley mechanism. Now, please remember that you could massively multiply your GEM factor to 1000, if you had a large pulley of 100 cm circumference and you added 10 of your mini-pulleys to the same belt. (10X100=1000)

.   NO,,, Don't listen to evil spirits, trying to lie to you about torque problems. There is only torque if you are generating power, and the only power you need to generate here, to make this mechanism self powering, is enough power to crank over one small DC motor, and that is divided by 10 cycles of AC electricity. These generators are like free running motors that are not connected to anything, with just the viscosity of the lubricant in the bearings as resistance. Sorry to destroy your excuse for this perpetual AC electricity generator, but this takes no torque, less than no torque, no torque divided by 10 even. You are not breaking the laws of thermodynamics, as you are only using pulley mechanics to freely multiply rotations. It just happens to be convenient, that these rotations are giving you the ability to generate AC electricity, and a lot more electricity out than you put in.

This has already been explained to you several times by those of us that have actually worked with motors and generators for years.  Your biggest mistake is you keep ignoring the torque fact.  You keep insisting it doesn't matter.  IT DOES MATTER!  You cannot just ignore the torque requirement just because you don't think it matters.  IT DOES MATTER!  In order to turn even one small alternator faster than the DC motor driving it the DC motor will require much more than a small spark of electricity.  It will require a steady supply of current that will exceed the amount you can get from your alternator.  And as you add more alternators the current requirement will go up again for each alternator you add.

You are not a prophet from God.  You are being used by satan to convince non-believers that Christians are a bunch of crackpots that believe in foolishness.  I really feel sorry for you.  You obviously want to help others but instead you are only causing irritation by your constant insistence that you are correct.  You keep posting the same thing over and over again when it should be clear to you that no one on this forum believes what you believe.

I am a Christian.  I believe in the rapture.  But the Bible makes it clear that only God knows when that will be.  Even Jesus said he did not know.  I do believe we are approaching the end times but to set a time for the rapture is clearly not in agreement with what the Bible says.  You are doing a disservice to God and to your fellow Christians by making these false claims.

Please stop posting on this forum.  It should be clear to you that you are not going to get any followers here.

Respectfully,
Carroll

[Low-Q]

I KNEW IT!    LMAO!!
You are a funny one, dude. A troll, but its fun to se some one missing the bulls eye by so much. Again, and again, and again

.   This works, http://free-energy.yolasite.com/ because of the simple mathematics of how a large pulley of 10 cm circumference does not cost 10 times more energy to rotate than a 1 cm circumference min-pulley. Yet the 10 cm of belt off of the large pulley can rotate a 1 cm mini-pulley 10 times, giving you 10 cycles of AC electricity. Now, try to tell me that 1 spark=short burst of DC current is equal to 10 cycles of AC electricity. WHY = you have just used pulley mechanics to multiply AC electricity by 10 + if you only add 3 more mini-pulleys to the same belt, like in my diagram, you can change your multiplication factor from 10 to 40. So that's 40 cycles of AC electricity that you have multiplied from one mere spark of DC current. You MUST be multiplying your electricity with this simple GEM = (Geographical Electricity Multiplier) free energy pulley mechanism. Now, please remember that you could massively multiply your GEM factor to 1000, if you had a large pulley of 100 cm circumference and you added 10 of your mini-pulleys to the same belt. (10X100=1000)

.   NO,,, Don't listen to evil spirits, trying to lie to you about torque problems. There is only torque if you are generating power, and the only power you need to generate here, to make this mechanism self powering, is enough power to crank over one small DC motor, and that is divided by 10 cycles of AC electricity. These generators are like free running motors that are not connected to anything, with just the viscosity of the lubricant in the bearings as resistance. Sorry to destroy your excuse for this perpetual AC electricity generator, but this takes no torque, less than no torque, no torque divided by 10 even. You are not breaking the laws of thermodynamics, as you are only using pulley mechanics to freely multiply rotations. It just happens to be convenient, that these rotations are giving you the ability to generate AC electricity, and a lot more electricity out than you put in.

[that_prophet]

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
YOU CAN MULTIPLY YOUR AC ELEVTRICITY BY 1000                          \
IF YOU USE 10 MINI-PULLEYS OF 1 cm CIRCUMFERENCE PULLEYS      ] = ME
WITH AC GENERATORS ATTACHED                                                    /
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
No, you can't. Our almighty God did not create physics to work this way.

-
Yes He did, when I asked Him to show that this tech was from Him,
+ not evil spirits just leading me astray,,,
He showed where this technology was in the Holy KJV Bible
= Ezekiel 1:16, where God's Word was "a wheel in the middle of a wheel"
which I interpreted as a little wheel on the inside of a large wheel.
but because I did not have anything to simulate this technology,
I decided to use pulleys to simulate this technology
-
+ Why can't you, as these are free running motors = easy to rotate = no torque at all
-

You, on the other hand practices the 2.nd and/or the 6.th deadly sins:
2. A lying tounge
and/or
6. A false witness that speaketh lies
So, stop trolling this forum with lies.

Vidar

Both of your accusations involve lying, 
Which I did not do + challenge you to prove,
Thereby I would hope that you will learn His Truth
About this Miraculous mechanism for mankind

[Low-Q]

Your interpretations are wrong. How can you be so sure based on a gut feeling?
Second, if you ask God, you get the answer you want to hear because the answer comes from your own head.
A wheel in a wheel can be anything with wheels or nothing to do with wheels.
If you want accurate information, that you don't by reading the bible, ypu must turn to science.
Appearently, God created man in his own image. That also includes modern scientists. Who else created them?
I know it is a dead end discussing this with you. YOU have something to prove. Build that pulley mechanism and show the world that you are either insane or a genious.


Vidar

-
Yes He did, when I asked Him to show that this tech was from Him,
+ not evil spirits just leading me astray,,,
He showed where this technology was in the Holy KJV Bible
= Ezekiel 1:16, where God's Word was "a wheel in the middle of a wheel"
which I interpreted as a little wheel on the inside of a large wheel.
but because I did not have anything to simulate this technology,
I decided to use pulleys to simulate this technology
-
+ Why can't you, as these are free running motors = easy to rotate = no torque at all
-
Both of your accusations involve lying, 
Which I did not do + challenge you to prove,
Thereby I would hope that you will learn His Truth
About this Miraculous mechanism for mankind