Utron research

[Cherryman]

@ smOkey tnx, that helps!




@ all, a side step notice :


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFFrh-FXE84

[Cherryman]

Not much to report, but i made a little raw compilation of ongoing testing.


https://youtu.be/pTYHfqBDEKc

[sm0ky2]

@ smOkey tnx, that helps!




@ all, a side step notice :


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFFrh-FXE84

Induction polarizes the screw such that it forms a dipole
I mean to say, that there are two magnetic dipoles falling
through the tube.
This double- acting lenz/Lorentz induction shortens the
length of the counter-emf opposing the falling neos.


Think of it as being two magnets, one longer and weaker
than the other. Let's call the outer pole of the neo N,
and the outer pole of the screw S.
The junction between the 2 "magnets" is null and void to
the tube, as the flux is almost entirely pulled into each
magnet at the junction. So you have a S pole falling, inducing
a N field which opposes its' motion. Since the distance from S
pole to N-transition is greater than the distance from N pole to
S-transition, the induced emf in the aluminum tube is longer on
the leading (N) side.
This creates an attraction to the N end of the magnet at a distance
greater than that which induces the countering S pole - with respect
to the falling N pole of the magnet stack.


Because these are permanent magnets, we do not 'see' the internal
energy exchanges. However, if this were set up inside an electromagnetic
motor - we would find that the energy used to create the offset in the lenz
field, is equal to the change in acceleration caused by the offset.

[sm0ky2]

In the same way that there is no real "gain" from the change in speed
of the falling magnets.


The field is diverted through the screw, changing the field of
the magnet on the screw-side.

[sm0ky2]

i drew this little thing, in case anyone had a hard time following my textual description.

proportions are drawn out of scale, to clearly see the geometric structure of the coil.

the increasing # of turns per step-down is important.
without having the mathematics on-hand, the best approach may be
a direct measurement of resistance between first and last turn of each step.
each step should represent equivalent resistance to the step before and after it.
as well as the beginning and end steps of the conical coil.
and as such, inductance, and capacitance will also be likewise of equivalent proportions.
(assuming that each step of the conical coil is made of the same material)