Pulling energy from the ambient energy field using a coil capacitor

[Dansway]

Hi Woopy,

Something like this.  I'm just throwing ideas out there..... 

[woopy]

Okay, thanks for the information Laurent.
So if I understand correctly, the primary is the strands of wire and the secondary is the copper foil tape... is this correct?


Luc

Yes correct

the stranded red wire (primary or exciter) is sandwitched between the 2 copper tapes (opened secondaries)

[gotoluc]

Yes correct

the stranded red wire (primary or exciter) is sandwitched between the 2 copper tapes (opened secondaries)

Based on my experiments and experience, even though you have a 1 to 1 transformer as far as the amount of turns between primary and secondary are concerned, your results are different probably because of the secondaries extra copper mass, surface area and lower resistance compared to the primary.
When your secondary is placed under much load (bulb) the voltage will clamp down but current will rise which I think is caused by the secondary extra copper mass, surface area and lower resistance compared to the primary thin wire strands.
However, if you could calculate Watts in compared to Watts out it probably adds to the same or just under unity.

Does this sound reasonable to you?

Luc

[woopy]

Hi Luc

what puzzle me in this Jack Noskill's experiment, is that the secondaries are two completely separated tape of copper . Each of those copper  tape is connected on one side to the bulb and the other end of each copper tape is connected to nothing.
So to say both connection of the bulb is not connected to the each other.

And between this 2 "not connected" tape, there is the "primary".

Of course we can think of capacitive coupling between the 2 tapes, but i am amazed to be able to light a incandescent bulb with only the capacitive coupling.

So for now i have tested pulses up to 83 volts and around 16 % duty cycle at 200 KHz, but i will try to find a mean to pulse much higher voltage, on shorter duty cycle to see what happen. The system seems very sensitive to frequency, so a delicate operation.

Luc have you read the PDF of Jack Noskill, what do you think of his theory ?

Thank's

Laurent

[gotoluc]

Hi Luc

what puzzle me in this Jack Noskill's experiment, is that the secondaries are two completely separated tape of copper . Each of those copper  tape is connected on one side to the bulb and the other end of each copper tape is connected to nothing.
So to say both connection of the bulb is not connected to the each other.

And between this 2 "not connected" tape, there is the "primary".

Of course we can think of capacitive coupling between the 2 tapes, but i am amazed to be able to light a incandescent bulb with only the capacitive coupling.

So for now i have tested pulses up to 83 volts and around 16 % duty cycle at 200 KHz, but i will try to find a mean to pulse much higher voltage, on shorter duty cycle to see what happen. The system seems very sensitive to frequency, so a delicate operation.

Luc have you read the PDF of Jack Noskill, what do you think of his theory ?

Thank's


Laurent

Hi Laurent,

The input or output (2 wires) leads do not need to be physically connected for a transformer to transfer power from primary or secondary if you have a high enough AC frequency and even better, if resonance is established.
My guess is, your transformer primary is creating a fast enough AC frequency for your tape foil secondary to charge its capacitance value close to resonance which in turns lights the bulb.
So, a transformer can transfer power through Induction or Capacitance if the correct conditions are met.
However, a Capacitive transformer is not a practical device as so many conditions need to be met for a good power transfer to occur.

8 years ago I when I was first playing and learning about resonance I found the same thing. In my case the primary was 2 separate wires (not connected) and the secondary was inductively powering the load.

Here is that old video demo: https://youtu.be/auFYEFBrwls?t=138

Unfortunately. even though a transformer primary input power does not change when you connect or disconnect the secondary load it does not mean you have a free lunch. If so, I would of had OU many years back.
You only have a free lunch when the output power (watts) is greater then the input power.

If your input is clean DC and you rectify your output to clean DC then you will be able to see the reality Pin vs Pout. In my experience the output power never exceeds the input power even if the input power is not affected by the output load.
However, It would be great to be proven wrong

Hope this is understandable?

Kind regards

Luc