Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[AlienGrey]

AG,
Maybe the real thing your comment here is pointing out is a lack of knowing what is being attempted here? I have destroyed the misconception of everyone in their thinking you can prove anything over the internet. So this makes pointless so many postings. It forces people to do science for themselves and prove to themselves what everyone was looking for others to do. So now we see Itsu says he doesn't read what I have said so why would anyone think what he was doing resembled what I am doing?
It's not merely a question of what the figures are but what do they imply? What is the basis and context of those figures? What is the relevance to anyone here? He is admittedly in uncharted territory here. His postings are curious but very limited. I'm not saying they are useless by any means. But I fail to understand the goal or purpose of this. Maybe that is part of your question as well.

Yes there is some truth in what you repeat here, but if we read from out side the test tube lab we might get a different view from others more factual knowledge especially when it's in a different tongue and where it's not suppressed by federal corporate greed, your transmitting and charging particles and capturing them down the line I did read Henry Morays publications
and Don smiths but you would be lucky to get any of them to work unless one knows the basic principals behind it all.

There was an article on you tube by a retired Turkish university 70 year profesor guy who gave away one of the secrets that wasn't very well thought out concerning electron travel time in different materials that might be of interest and then there is the TK's use of the caduceus coil it's all a big give away, but never investigated by any of the guys here not even Itsu to my knowledge and then there is Nelson 
AG

[Hoppy]

If I understand you in your using the word "vagaries" that you are thinking that there is just a very unexpected and inexplicable thing happening in the battery and maybe not even predictable or repeatable. Well, I have been at this 15 years full time and this is very real science that is just more than mainstream practice. I have long demystified all this stuff and Bedini's wild bar talk storytelling.  But batteries are only the basic first stage experience in this tech. It does not depend on using a battery to experience these processes. I'm personally burned out with batteries and motors but that is all that is permissible for the public.

Yes, eccept with a lot of observation through experimentation - yes, years of it like you - the vagaries become understood as being normal characteristics of batteries under different operating conditions. That is why I can, like you, run a 6W load for an hour and the 12AH battery stay the same while such loads were also being powered from that. Now that does not infer that I want a pis.....g contest with you on best performance.  All I am saying is that when laborius and properly conducted load tests are carried out, it is clear to me that the performance of a given DUT can be explained in conventional / mainstream terms. Now, I don't expect you to agree that I may be right on this issue, just to agree to disagree without launching into a tirade.

[itsu]

Hi Itsu,
Thanks for your efforts.  Okay that it contradicts to my above post, we learn all the time. 

We need to evaluate the results. I think your small and shorted wire loop for indicating the current is ok. 
It is also interesting that current maximum remains in the middle while the voltage minimum moves up from
the bottom when you use the ground.  One would expect them both move.  Let's approach this otherwise:
what is approximate wire length in your TX coil?  When I thought of comparing the TX circuit to a vertical antenna, 
it came from a Tesla coil voltage distribution.  As the Corum brothers wrote it is a quarter wave helical resonator, with maximum voltage
at the top and minimum at the bottom if tuned correctly. 
Will be back later tomorrow only. 

Gyula

Gyula,


Data on the big coil is here:

https://overunity.com/17491/confirmation-of-ou-devices-and-claims/msg534327/#msg534327


We have 145 turns on a 16cm diameter former,  meaning a circumference of 50.27cm.
This comes to a coil wire length of 72.8m

If you consider this a ¼ wave length, then the full wavelength will be 291.2m so 1.029 MHz.


Itsu

[AlienGrey]

Yes well, so whats a DUT a 'dead universal transistor' ?  if your going to use brain teasers can you declare them please  some where in your post

And please be aware it's not just that you live your life - it's how you live your life that's important!

AG

[Hoppy]

Yes well, so whats a DUT a 'dead universal transistor' ?  if your going to use brain teasers can you declare them please  some where in your post

And please be aware it's not just that you live your life - it's how you live your life that's important!

AG

Device under test.