Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[a.king21]

Steel tpu.  I have read all the comments on that site.  In business there are always disputes (if you have ever worked in one). The facts that are indisputable are these:
Rick worked with Bedini for many years.
I have talked with people in the US who have personal knowledge of individuals  scammed by Bedini for 300,000 Us dollars.
Rick built most of the Bedini systems including the Ferris wheel.
He knows the world's best in this field and we are grateful to have him here.
I would rather take his advice than your advice any day of the week.
You know nothing compared to Rick about this technology.
Stick to the scientific facts and leave business and catty disputes out of pure science.

[a.king21]

Steel TPU 
As a final note:  I ordered stuff from Rick and it was duly delivered as ordered.
Everything was first class.
The coils were so well made you could use them as an ornament in your house.
The book is brilliant and informative.
The Don Smith book demystifies the process and is a perfect manual for this technology.
( I also have the Book).
Again the book is hard backed and first class  re the information in it.
(some spelling errors - but nothing to detract from the meaning)
So I have learnt a lot and now understand the Kapanadze process.

[AlienGrey]

You don't need my parts to consider any of these things. I just made an AM transmitter coil with decent Q over 100 and focused on a medium frequency of 1.25MHz with 100pf standard cap (with low Q for safety). That works well for these experiments. You can see I made two larger coils that had the same inductance so that the same frequency and capacitance could be used (the 10 coils were slightly off however). These had higher Q and resulted in greater gains (I don't expect you to believe this). The kit, and these bigger coils, are not in a 1/4 wavelength relationship, so I did not make this kit all that it could be. Ideally there is one secondary closely coupled (but still loosely) to the transmitter so that all the flux passes through it before continuing on THROUGH external receiver coils as shown in the picture (which could represent powering the small input power like Don Smith's input wires from the battery that were a wavelength of the primary). That secondary in a quarter wave length, not considering the other receiver coils, would be influenced to experience the full extent of the primary fluxing in each turn of its windings so that when loaded you could more fully appreciate the gains produced by the primary resonance amplification of energy. But to claim to be estimating the transmitting energy gains by a distant receiver coil's output (that is only influenced by a small percentage of radiation) is misleading (as in the case of the MIT demonstration). So my demo was only to show more coils with a 360 rotation (still only a small angle of the total radiation). But this was also to show the relay effect (relay coils that were also loaded) indicating that the receiver coils now become transmitters (and thus the process can start all over again, and even power the initial transmitter when properly phased/placed). G, it doesn't take a whole lot of time for you to play around with this and drop the input power down to zero or almost zero. It's up to you to convince yourself. You ought not to be convinced by any of my pictures, videos, or words. Don't pretend that you should be and that I haven't provided enough evidence. There is no such things as evidence through online forums. No such thing. People, realize that just because someone says they disbelieve something it doesn't mean they are telling the truth to you, or even to themselves. Many skeptics do believe but are afraid to admit the truth. Many more are merely trying to draw out more information from you so that you can work for them for free as they actually are developing this technology. Of course there are also those who monitor people as well. These things are a lot more sophisticated than you would think. I have seen this face to face over the years.

I'm sure that might be the case but your not the only person offing the knowledge for instance there have been many of late and for free as well, if left to some most of the earth would or will be very soon under sea but many labeled as hostile from places like Russia China Lithuania and Korea have all given useful help of knowledge and technical knowhow advice with links on this forum perhaps not this thread though only look.

[gyulasun]

Rick,

I show scepticism with any extraordinary claim which is not proved in practice with measurements correctly, and
this latter is not the case yet with your setup.  I never wrote that obtaining excess energy is not possible at all. 
I do have an open mind and I believe that a circuit setup can surely be built which can produce extra energy
compared to its input we feed in. 
So far your setup in question does not seem to produce any extra output.  Did you use your light meter for checking
LED bulbs brightness in front of the 18 people?  Did you calibrate your LED bulbs in advance with measured DC input
power to know what power level is involved at the certain brigthnesses of the LEDs?


Now you wrote this:

....
  Notice I answered your point in that measurement is 0.5W each (it is sometimes 3W when I put the ferrite coil 
in the transmitter, which also brings down the input to 0.5W) with larger LEDs. There were 15 total as I had 4 smaller 
coils with larger bulbs as well (one under the table and 4 at the top at one point--10 big coils, 4 smaller, and 1 on 
a ferrite rod). There were 75 small coils with LEDs totaling over 2W. So we have at least 8W of measured power 
with 0.75W or less input. 
....

If you go back and read what you wrote yesterday, please show me where is the 'measurement' word or any
expression relevant in that part of your text from which I or anyone else should deduce you were writing about
measurements.  This is what you wrote yesterday: 

....
Anyway, would 0.5W on the bulbs be acceptable to you on those bigger bulbs? I know that may be problematic
considering the input was in the picture 1W and with more bulbs and coils 0.75W. Would 0.000A on the input be
acceptable to you? At that point would it matter that I had 1,000,000 little LEDs powered up, 
or several thousand 3W bulbs at 0.5W each? 
....

The measurements made by Itsu are clearly shown and report a COP of 0.3 or so if I recall correctly. This is a huge
difference versus your hints.  He checked LED brightness by feeding in known DC power, etc. 

You did not comply with my requests on correct measurements. 

You hint at not less than you have achieved lossless energy transfer between magnetically coupled resonant LC circuits. 
The labs all over the world seek for doing that but they have not managed to solve that problem.
You need to prove such energy transfer with correct measurements.  Otherwise, only those people who do  not have
as much area ofexpertise as you will believe they have a COP>1 setup. 
If you disagree with this, then prove me wrong.   

Gyula 

[AlienGrey]

Rick,

I show scepticism with any extraordinary claim which is not proved in practice with measurements correctly, and
this latter is not the case yet with your setup.  I never wrote that obtaining excess energy is not possible at all. 
I do have an open mind and I believe that a circuit setup can surely be built which can produce extra energy
compared to its input we feed in. 
So far your setup in question does not seem to produce any extra output.  Did you use your light meter for checking
LED bulbs brightness in front of the 18 people?  Did you calibrate your LED bulbs in advance with measured DC input
power to know what power level is involved at the certain brigthnesses of the LEDs?


Now you wrote this:



If you go back and read what you wrote yesterday, please show me where is the 'measurement' word or any
expression relevant in that part of your text from which I or anyone else should deduce you were writing about
measurements.  This is what you wrote yesterday: 



The measurements made by Itsu are clearly shown and report a COP of 0.3 or so if I recall correctly. This is a huge
difference versus your hints.  He checked LED brightness by feeding in known DC power, etc. 

You did not comply with my requests on correct measurements. 

You hint at not less than you have achieved lossless energy transfer between magnetically coupled resonant LC circuits. 
The labs all over the world seek for doing that but they have not managed to solve that problem.
You need to prove such energy transfer with correct measurements.  Otherwise, only those people who do  not have
as much area ofexpertise as you will believe they have a COP>1 setup. 
If you disagree with this, then prove me wrong.   

Gyula

Hmm lighting leds isn't too difficult a task I had a device on my front door porch light 7 years running off mains transit noise through the night in the end some of the leds died and i got fed up with unsoldering the pcbs to replace them and ran out of that type of blue led. if I wanted fre energy led's i could just copy that circuit with out huge coils like Rick is offering. No disrespect intended.