Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[rickfriedrich]

Not sure who you are (I don't do well with not reading people's actual names), but thanks for the posting. Yes, it may seem strange to say, but my goal was not to give the highest outputs possible for the kit, but a big agenda of mine is to keep people safe. The kit can already produce rf burn and I specifically avoided mention of connecting to actual ground because that can result it too much power. So I used 50V low Q caps as well. My goal is to have you see the very sensitive relationships. Of course we also made the kit with the identical parts of the original kit Don learned these things from, and where he said to start. So I am a true student of Don's and have not only replicated many of his claims but have also been able to fulfill his dream in making the book completed as he always wanted. Anyway, you rightly should be able to make many better systems. My other students have used more expensive and much faster gate drivers in the 4 nanosecond range with both this kit and the motor systems to show much more improved effects. I love to see people run with all this stuff. They have also made much higher Q coils (which you can see some of my bigger coils in the video I just uploaded).
As for everyone else, probably 99% of my customers are not going to be on these forums. They privately email each other after they meet at meetings and associate in the real world. These forums are really an outdated 90's thing that doesn't work anymore, and such people don't have time for all the distractions as they are actually building upon proper foundations. I mention this as so many people on these forums just assume that everyone has not succeeded in replicating and using this technology. But in fact not only are larger Don Smith systems used all around the world, but the process are being used right in some of the products you use already. It is a marvel that people cannot see what is right in front of them.

Hello !  I have the schematics.  There are around (at least ) 50 different setup shematics that you will come to as following the several experiments the kit will drive you through. I paid 100 usd for them and I have already stated HOW GRATEFUL I am to Rick for the golden experiments packed inside. He knows that, as I'm sometimes asking him questions which he has ALWAYS taken the time to answer. So you see, what' s really missing is YOU helping him. Now if you read carefully the figures Rick is listing you will be able to start this research with a physical exercise...I have , at the beginning during this thread, mentionned the Resonant induction coupler kit with a few indications that allow one not having bought the kit to discover the effect. This is why I ws able to "rebuild from chinese cables and caps" several other competitor kits to Rick, and all demonstrated how to light a 3.8 V with an input between 0.78 and 2.2 V. , therefore indicating to me I have understood at least the first few methods Rick is teaching us. Notice the word : teaching. So yes, I have replicated the kit with several inductors and capacitors. I have at least 4 or 5 concurrent versions that work, of which one better than the kit ! (ie LED brighter with lesser input). And including one that never works with my FG (2000V 47 uF caps if I recall) topping at 60mhz. I guess the inductance doesn't "cross" capacitance at that frequency...(have to try more ?), to use such terminology.
WHEN I ASKED ITSU WHY HE WOULD NEVER LIGHT HIS SMALL LED AT 1,2 MHZ AT 2 V BUT THAT IT WOULD BE LIGHTED UP BRIGTHLY AT 1.25 MHZ WHEN I TRIED TO EXPLAIN HIM THIS IS THE VOLTAGE MULTIPLICATION EFFECT IN RESONANCE, MY QUESTION REMAINS STILL ...RESPONSELESS (including by "mr smart" Gyula). Too bad : I have offered here even without the consent of Rick, but in the total sharing of the spirit of his work to help the world, the object of a first exercise in his kit that many if not all of you are incapable of analyzing properly !. I am no EE, and do not even know the difference between AC and a frequency generator at 60 HZ ! So guys, before tauntering others like I saw so many times (too many...), just be humble and GO TO THE BENCH ON YOUR OWN !
Final word also for a few posts (they will recognize themselves) about Rick too long, too this, too mmh what is worth your contribution blah blah... To each of them : Before having the audacious yet lost approach to ask Rick what he has done, I ask you the question : have you done the millionth of what he did for free in free energy ? Yes ? Spell your name, that I may run a google-compare with Your name !
To this other guy out tbere telling Rick he has gone farther than him in this research : if you have done better and are interjecting about this right now in this forum it is the proof you have never shared anything in comparison to Rick. Which amounts a massive underuniy system ! Zero sharing ie zero value ie zero gift (to me they are the same thing). Continue the same stuff : you will be able to take it with you to a much more useful place !...

[rickfriedrich]

One of these days I will delete all my videos and start over again and do proper videos that I carefully do. So far I just made fast videos as I don't have the time. They are ok but not satisfactory to me as they are. So it may seem strange but I don't think much of my own videos. I agree with many of my critics, but under the circumstances they serve some purpose.
I don't know what particular concept you are referring to in the first sentence.
The second point is more involved and I have found a good place to find examples and teaching on that subject from practical real-world examples is with the rectenna technology. I spent many hours going over these details with my students and I like to use existing technology as a way of explaining these things. My point is to show you how you can go from the L2 or receiver coil onward. This includes the impedance matching and 1/4 wavelengths that are not part of my kit.
I am sorry but I have existing products that are proprietary that I am not going to just give away the details of this that relate to answering your question. That pertains to actually changing the phase angle... I have shared some of that at my meetings however. Give it another year with people getting used to the kits and I will add more options as I have time to properly teach on these things. But I have included an avarmenko plug in the kit for people to be able to gate out the energy from a series tank circuit through a one wire transfer to therefore charge a capacitor. All that is already part of the teaching of the kit. I also provide a variable capacitor so that if you detune a receiver coil you can also adjust the capacitor so that it can remain in resonance.
Everyone is wanting to jump to the conclusions and I can see that the foundation is still not settled yet. In the end no one really wants to be on this forum. They just want to have something given to them and be done with it. While I have done just that for many people over the years I also see more of a need to teach people how to make parts around them do what they want. But this is painful to get people to think for themselves and overcome their prejudices.
Reading your last phrase I may not entirely understand what you mean by "independent of input resonance". I will just mention here that, unlike the kit where we have equal coils and work with the same frequencies, in the real products you have primary and secondaries with different frequencies that are in 1/4 wave relationships.

Rick
Within plenty of your long videos ,which  one is the best to watch to understand concept ? English is not my native language and watching few 1hour long videos is too much for me
Can you explain how you move the phase angle between voltage and current in output resonant circuit to get output power independent of input resonance ?

[rickfriedrich]

Hey Thaelin,
Thanks for the input. Yes, that was a small meeting so I didn't think anyone from there would be on here. You have been on the old groups years ago so you can appreciate my points on the foundation here. Even your testimony could be fake and I want to stress how important it is for people to only allow something to be proven to themselves in the real world. We can develop only an hypothesis on these forums or with videos and pictures and testimony. People can be mistaken. Testimonies can be paid for, etc.
If you were in the room during the lunch hour you would have realized that I was not planning on showing the phase conjugation with the coils. It normally would take me some hours to set that all up to do that. So when I got it in place over lunch I changed the plan and decided to show that. And we added all the ferrite inductors with loads that we had on hand and each dropped the input as the frequency was reduced on the primary till it went as low as the power supply would allow. This is what I have sometimes done in my meetings when I was playing around with something and the people got to see something really special. Like when I was up all night in Goshen and was messing around with showing one motor powering another motor and then that powering a third motor which charged a battery, I decided to show the inverted motor concept that I have shown again. I showed it because people were walking in and I decided to go over it then. 

  Hi all:
    I have to chime in here as I was one of them in attendance. I went to Lodi, Ca for his two day work shop. I went to see one thing and found another as well. I sat there in disbelief as he added more and more output coils drawing a load and the input stayed the same. Just the output wattage was going up.
    What is in the book is what was setup. He had to stop adding more output coils due to not wanting to blow the scope used for the readings.


Not much more I can say. No video, no pictures other than the ones I took, just live right in front of all of us.


thay

[a.king21]

Rick,........
.... This is what I suggested to RomeroUK years ago and he then showed a video
in which he carried his running mot-gen setup looped via a DC/DC converter with himself while walking...   

I wonder whether you are going to consider my looping suggestion or write about again my scepticism or about
bent scepticism  . You can say a self running setup can also be faked and this is true but if you show a certain
start-up procedure we could agree on in advance, openly on this forum, then faking could be minimized at least.

I would kindly suggest building this self running setup for members a.king and benfr because they have the original coils set. 


Gyula

I have a very serious point to make sir....


What happened to Romerouk after he showed that self runner?  Do you remember?
I'll remind you....he was visited by MIB and threatened with his life and he was too ill to work for months after that.
What happened to Tinman after he showed OU on youtube?  His videos were taken down and he was visited by MIB.
What happened to Dave Lawton after he replicated Stan Meyer and disclosed you had to charge the capacitors for over 12 hours to condition them?  He was visited by MIB who seized all his documents.
What happened to Thane Heinz students after they replicated his trafo and showed it on youtube? I rang them up in Canada and they were terrified and denied OU (they didn't know who I was  ie if I was a government agent).
I also spoke to Lutec years ago and they were terrified and denied OU to me.
If Rick shows me a circuit - I will build it but you will never get a video. PERIOD.
This is not a game and Rick knows the line not to cross.  Re-read his posts.  He says so.
So please devise a test where the line is not crossed but satisfies the EE in you.  If me and benfr replicating but not showing a video is fine, then I am OK with that.
Kind regards...


EDIT:  How could I forget... What happened to Wesley (Stivep) and Kapanadze when they were together on a plane?  Both were poisoned on the plane and nearly died........  There is even a video Wesley took of kapanadze in an ill state.

[citfta]

  Hi all:
    I have to chime in here as I was one of them in attendance. I went to Lodi, Ca for his two day work shop. I went to see one thing and found another as well. I sat there in disbelief as he added more and more output coils drawing a load and the input stayed the same. Just the output wattage was going up.
    What is in the book is what was setup. He had to stop adding more output coils due to not wanting to blow the scope used for the readings.


Not much more I can say. No video, no pictures other than the ones I took, just live right in front of all of us.


thay

Can you please explain the statement I have high-lighted.  You are saying the input power did not go up as he kept adding more coils.  I have no problem understanding that part.  But how was a scope being used in such a way as to possibly damage it when measuring the output power?  I have used scopes for over 50 years and I don't understand how the scope was put in danger by adding more output coils.  It is strange statements like this that make confusion for those of us with real electronics experience.

Respectfully,
Carroll