Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[rickfriedrich]

Carrol that would be more than puzzling indeed. I remember correcting someone on that. So unless I wrote directly opposite then I don't know why you think I confirmed that.
Let's be clear here:
1. The input voltage stays the same on my power supply.
2. The amperage goes down when we load it down most of the time. It can go up under certain circumstances as well.
3. I don't recall saying the coil voltage goes up with added coils, but it can (WHILE THE INPUT VOLTAGE STAYS THE SAME) if you are in a phase mirroring situation and so the coil is also a receiver.
4. Itsu is doing something else, not my setups.
5. Yes, gate driver means just that. It is not driving a gate however, but merely switching directly. It is 12A so it is capable. But the significance is that it creates a fast rate of change. We see the circulating voltage go from 250V without it to 1300V in the kit. The Impulse energy is what we are focusing on besides the oscillating energy gains from resonance. Both are amplifying energy process. Obviously yet to be proved to most people here who haven't yet experimented and are looking to others to confirm such things for them.

There is something I have been thinking about for several days now I just still don't understand.  Some comments have been made that have said the voltage across the input coil keeps going up when more secondary coils are added.  And Rick has confirmed this.  Also comments have been made that the input current keeps going down as more secondary coils are added.  And the claim has been made that the power keeps going down as secondary coils are added.  But if the voltage is going up while the current is going down that does NOT mean the power is going down when secondary coils are added.  That only means the circuit is becoming more inductive which is increasing the inductive reactance.

The other question or puzzle for me is how is the voltage across the primary coil going up?  The only schematic I have seen in this thread is the one posted by Itsu.  And if i recall correctly the primary was being fed by a power supply so the voltage to the coil would be fixed and thus not able to go up.  So something just doesn't add up there.

And the last thing that is puzzling me is what is meant by the term "Gate Driver".  I keep hearing that term used in the videos and by others as if it is some secret circuit that is making all this magic possible.  I know what a gate driver is in real electronics.  It is just a simple chip with a circuit built into it that supplies the proper signal to drive either a mosfet or IGBT.  I have used them for years.  But what is the "gate driver" referred to in this thread?

Respectfully,
Carroll

[rickfriedrich]

This is not a disputed point. The radiation goes out and covers about 70% of the area around the coil. This is a common thing which you can see in tuning coils. Again, you just have to play around with the coils and see for yourself. That is one reason for the kit 

Should be fun to see if somebody will ansver to citftas  questions. Adding my two previous questions also;
How is it possibe to  lit the LEDs  with the coils coupled in two absolutely different directions/ situations pic1, pic2, but they are all shining fine in both cases.

Regards Arne

[rickfriedrich]

I answered the first point from Carrol already.
No, this is obviously not the case you are suggesting. First of all you have a 12AH battery whose voltage does not change for an hour straight. You can see slight fluctuations so it is not some stuck meter either. You have the initial voltage drop at the beginning and it holds that voltage and slightly rises up according him tuning it with different loads and rpm adjustments.
Secondly, if the battery was sulfated then it would have been flat dead in minutes.
Thirdly, if it was in a plateau as I explained the other day in response to A's post, then it actually couldn't be because we had about 200W loads on that motor without changing the voltage other than a little flicker. You try loading down a 12AH battery with a motor and a 200W load for 1 second and tell me what happens. This shows you do not have any working experience with loading batteries. Even if it was a few watts you would see a little difference. But here we have 2 100W LEDs with no voltage drop. Also with zero volts AC or DC across these loads. The People were watching the two voltmeters the whole time. The charging battery remained charging and the input battery held itself. Again, this setup was used to run his shop lights that were over 1000W total exactly like that for many months before he brought it to the US. You guys wanted a claim of significant OU and self-running and when I show this I get this kind of response??  Now I don't expect anyone to believe this because you were not there. But this is the kind of thing you have been asking for. BTW, some of the nodes in the box are what I have shown already. But the ones with the big 100W LEDs are other arrangements.

Yes, agreed.

Another thought provoking thing is Rick's motor / charger video. My experiences using this type of setup, both solid state and electro-mechanical, was that initially and for fairly long periods of time, some 'exciting' rising voltage readings resulted, both on charge and source batteries. However, at a certain point in the run, a fairly quick primary terminal voltage fall and a stabilising charging voltage would commence. I deduced that this effect was most likely due to the effects of de-sulfation. This effect was most noticeable on brand new LA batteries (both SLAB's and wet cell) and batteries that had been sitting unused for a considerable time. Perhaps Rick could comment on this. The length of the video demonstration would in my opinion from experience, be quite suitable to demonstrate the 'exciting' effects, without necessarily seeing the downturn.It should also be appreciated that 'Peukerts Law' also operates in reverse, that is with battery loads considerably lower than the C20 rate.

[rickfriedrich]

Grow up endlessnonsense. There were about 60 people there. This was at the end of the day after most had left. Your insults show who you are. You have not a clue what was going on actually. The bulb was the same brightness the whole time it was in the water. Try turning your youtube setting up beyond 144 buddy. This is a high quality upload of 9GB. Maybe stop the drinking before you watch videos and comment. 

So everything you say is a lie I see. Are you just hopping that people don't watch this for themselves? What a disinfo troll!! BATTERIES WERE NOT DECREASING. They stabilize. The charging battery was around 11.80V before and charged up. The input battery remained the same after the slight voltage drop. It also rose higher.
These were not dimly lit LEDs. There were 2 100W LEDS and the camera naturally makes adjustments to light. I never said this was meant to prove anything. This is meant to teach people who want to learn. You are just a mocker who does not want to believe in OU. Just here to turn people away. Grow up man.

Obviously this video is really disturbing to these troublemakers. They are really upset and panicking like the crazy woman last year clawing at the front door when Kavanagh was becoming supreme court justice.  All they can do is throw a tantrum and heap abuse. It just makes me laugh. No one cares buddy. You add no value to any of this.

Convention?  There were about 20 ragtag retirees at that thing none of whom had a technical clue about what is going on.  All amazed and talking silliness about "not normal electricity".  What was the point of dropping the LED in the glass of water and in the end it did not light anyway hahaha

Whats going on around the box??   I know exactly what you mean so when I say in light hearted fashion that the biggest thing going on around that box is two whopping batteries (THAT ARE STILL DECREASING IN VOLTAGE) AND SOME VERY DIMLY LIT bogus load LEDS, don't think I do not know what you mean.  There are several hairpin type Tesla setups that can excite the environment and do what you demonstrate.   PLEASE!!!.....that Indian looking pot belly guy was an embarrassment talking nonsense.


STOP implying OU when there is none.  YES you can keep adding loads on these type circuits and in SOME cases the main driver will decrease in consumption.  YES you have to match impedances and you cannot over work the circuit with infinite output.  However, Rick you still talk too much and post lengthy winded nonsense. 


The only people buying your garbage that flows from your mouth are the uneducated.


A couple brave retirees in that video kept pointing out that the battery voltages were falling.    There is no OU in THAT system.  Anyone with skills and versed in the art can brightly light LEDS and replicate but how bout you just put as many coils as you want around the main driver, RECTIFY properly and then charge a battery/s.  What you are doing there is not even 90% efficient.

Your kit with those miniscule red leds......put a real load on it

[rickfriedrich]

Glad you're going. This thread is about confirmation of claims and the focus was the kit. I am not making this about the kit but about the processes. You are just bent on assuming evil at every point. Your spirit is evident to all. Why don't you do something constructive rather than just assume evil. Again, your agitation is merely because you don't want people to believe this. Well I actually don't want people to conclude anything from this. This is just for people who already know these things and are looking for things they can try. That is the purpose of this threat is it not? Again, go do something useful or what is the point of your words?

My thoughts exactly.  Its an advertisement thread for kits anyway