Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Confirmation of OU devices and claims

Started by tinman, November 10, 2017, 10:53:19 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

rickfriedrich

Well, you will just have to see for yourself. I'm not sure who would dispute this. The angle would have to be turned more for it to not work. When you are very close like that you can almost turn it in any direction and it will do this.

Quote from: seaad on June 26, 2019, 05:53:35 AM
This IS a disputed point when it comes to the mutual angles of the input and output coils!
Not the cover of radiation.

My picture below shows the principal of coil couplings in old days radios.

Regards Arne

rickfriedrich

Carrol,
I thought that everyone commenting knew what the circuit was from the context of A's initial posting on my kit (not sure what that was however as I came in way after that). The starting point of the kit is to have a frequency generator send a square wave to a fast mosfet driver. It's output will have the red wire go to the inductor which is in series with a capacitor, whose other leg is attached to the common ground (which is many times earth ground). That is a series tank resonant circuit when tuned to the right frequency.

So out of resonance you would have 9V circulating voltage while you have 9V input. But in resonance you can have 1300V while the input and circulating current is maybe 25ma. Without the gate driver the circulating voltage between the cap and the inductor can be around 250V. Yes this is a gain when in resonance. The circulating energy can produce real results at a distance over what it can do out of resonance. It can produce real results in itself under some conditions as well.

As for the 5000V circulating voltage, when we were doing 180,000 CPS we were running the input at 18V and higher amperage (200ma something). Yes the circulating voltage in the coil was very high, and the 100 times probe was only rated for 2500V, and I had just damaged another one doing the same thing. This is common knowledge even though people don't want to admit that it is real gain. Some suppose the circulating amperage is correspondingly lower, but that is a huge mistake and obviously not the case. There is some serious radiation under that condition.
The how is called resonance.

Quote from: citfta on June 26, 2019, 07:32:04 AM

Rick, someone who saw one of your demonstrations said that in your demonstration you had to remove your scope because you were afraid of blowing it because the voltage being measured was getting up to 5000 volts.  When I asked you about that you said the probe was measuring the voltage on the primary coil.  That is why I asked about it again.  How can you get  5000 volts across the primary if it is being powered by 12 volts?  So what circuit were you using that would do that?  And the second part of the high-lighted sentence doesn't even make sense.  How can the voltage go up on the primary coil while the input voltage remains the same?


What are you calling circulating voltage?  And where are you measuring it?  A simple schematic of your circuit would help explain a lot.  Or does someone have to buy your kit to see the circuit?

EDIT:  Itsu was kind enough to PM me with information explaining the high voltage.  I was confused about how the gate driver was driving the coil.  Thanks Itsu for the clarification.


Respectfully,
Carroll

rickfriedrich

Jeg,
I really appreciate you saying this. There really isn't much more to say. As you say, it is up to people do experiment and to really understand the key themes.

Quote from: Jeg on June 26, 2019, 07:59:04 AM
Rick
Thanks a lot for sharing your valuable experience here. Also many thanks to A.King for his dedication and his great idea to invite Rick Frederic himself to this forum.

Looks like that you have already covered a lot of things for someone to start this journey. What it needs now I guess is the active personal involvement from the part of the experimenter.

There are many questions yet but as time passes everything finds its place.

Many people just watching quietly not because there is no appreciation of what is being presented, but more as a respect to you and to what you are trying to do. But I am sure you already know, that many people right now are already trying with real bench work to apply the new ideas that have been brought here by you.
Just continue your fascinating work.

Best Regards
Jeg

rickfriedrich

Very good to hear this from you.
Yes, the key is "balance".
There are bunch of options here, and I leave this for people to learn the full way for themselves. I have shown the basic way that gets people started.
Yes, the object is not to charge the batteries but to keep them basically in the same place so that you don't have to rotate them and then you just have the true self-runner. For people really don't want to mess with batteries anyway. It actually is an pain to have to deal with a charging battery just as much as having to charge up an input battery. So we have to start with a discharged battery on the charge side and a charged battery on the input side. Then they will have their minor rise and drops at start up and then just hold out the same. If you unbalance the load and make it too much you can send back more energy to the front and the input charges up. You can drop the charging rate as well if it becomes unbalanced. Someone was trying to suggest that the battery charging was sometimes discharging. But that never was the case. The charging battery started at low voltage and rose up under charge, and merely dropped a little at times due to specific changes in the tuning. It was always charging. But the object is not to charge that battery but to be merely a potential or more like Tesla's end point "P" in his schematics. A terminal point or capacitance.

It think people will finally get this now. It is a whole different day.

Quote from: baudirenergie on June 26, 2019, 01:20:01 PM
Hi Rick,
you ask me if I am here because of NickZ (hope translater had worked correctly). No, I am not here, for this people, that against everyone that really wants to help others to find a direction. I will be happy, if he can make a cognitive shift :) but my answer did not have the goal to convince him.
I have seen this Game here - I think - since 2014. What they do with people like Wesley, T-1000 and all the other friendly people here. I have seen it for years what they have done with my very good friend, that has lost neary everything because of his device (it is not practical, but here you can see a simple experiment from him, if you want: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAtqPL_maeg ).
Nearly in every forum or group and also in real life: always the same procedures to distract people from real results.
So why I am here? I hope that everyone that search for answers and reads all this comments can clearly see what is going on here. Hope that they also wake up, and can see a direction, before they lost to much lifetime and faith. Every troll was a wakeup pill for me. I had only to follow all this honest people, that were mostly attacked from this guys. Thank you for that :)
What I also often see in the last years was that "good" people  -for exsample- like Thomas from A. (you know him) show his customers how they overload Li-Ion batteries, but doesn't show any of this important things.
The most is 180° out of phase in this area. When you see all this, eventually you came to a point, that you realize you have to do something and this is the reason why I posted here some comments.

P.S.: thank you for your last video. Amazing! I was able to replicate the zero voltage process with my small bedini, but didn't realize the enormous potential and the importance to keep both sides in balance at this time. I had this strange moment, where the whole system stands still in the same Voltages for round about half a hour, after I added some bad tuned LC Parts and LEDs in the secondary side. The secondary battery was not rise significant in Voltage, because it was not the best and not fully converted I think. After your Video, I realized that was not important to load the second battery, because my additional lights were on and the bedini was running the whole time.

rickfriedrich

Thank you Acca.

Quote from: Acca on June 26, 2019, 12:30:30 PM
Rick keep on ...


Your posts are very good.. I like to read them as I have been a  study of Bedini for many years..
Nick demanding proof is a non matter here as his failure is evident..


I give you my support here..


Acca..