Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[a.king21]

  Rick:   It's funny because the link you just posted was what I had typed out from your circuit diagram so I could find the video.  Anyway I was going to post the circuit diagram because some people want to look at a circuit.
So here is Rick's circuit which is basically Tesla.  A flat hairpin circuit maybe??
I assume that the motor can be replaced with a solid state ssg type circuit which I would like a kit for......
Anyhow if  I'm wrong I am sure I will get a rebuke from Rick.  But some of us  do like solid state.....
The diagram takes a lot of study and I suggest you watch Rick's vid.
. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3JyRMdJhzg&feature=youtu.be

[rickfriedrich]

Maybe modify your post to refer to this picture instead. I forgot to add my name to it.

  Rick:   It's funny because the link you just posted was what I had typed out from your circuit diagram so I could find the video.  Anyway I was going to post the circuit diagram because some people want to look at a circuit.
So here is Rick's circuit which is basically Tesla.  A flat hairpin circuit maybe??
I assume that the motor can be replaced with a solid state ssg type circuit which I would like a kit for......
Anyhow if  I'm wrong I am sure I will get a rebuke from Rick.  But some of us  do like solid state.....
The diagram takes a lot of study and I suggest you watch Rick's vid.
.

[a.king21]

modified.

[popolibero]

Hi Rick,


thanks for posting your schematic, see for me now everything's clear. It's what I did as my first option, the parallel resonant option I mean. Now that's why there's hardly any voltage to see, the load is inserted in series inside the parallel tank, where there's only oscillating current, the only voltage is the one developed by the load itself, across it's own impedance. What are those led modules rated for anyway? Your drawing of the resonant setup (on the right) is a bit confusing, is it supposed to be two distinct coils? One with core? Or one coil with a secondary? I know different ways to extract the energy from a parallel tank, I'm just not sure which one you're referring to with that drawing.


When at resonance the tank just looks like an almost infinite impedance to the SG coil output, so since the SG coil discharge adapts to the load impedance we get very narrow HV spikes. We could actually remove the output battery and replace it by a wire if we wanted to, just have to be careful not to fry the components . It's actually a 2 wire system pulsing a resonant tank which we extract some power off of the resonant reactive oscillations. Yes, we could put more tanks in series, but wouldn't it be much better putting more (infinite) parallel tanks in parallel? I think this is what Kron is showing, right? I'm not sure yet about the added series coils he shows between each tank, but I suppose it's a way to separate them from each other while all of them still keep having the same effect on the generator as just one tank: depending on frequency we can get to a point where the generator current becomes (almost) zero, but all the tanks are at full oscillating power! Am I seeing this correctly? In the end it's all about hitting as many tuning forks as possible with one trigger.


As for me getting emotional, yes sometimes it can happen. Like I wrote earlier, I've been at this for quite awhile now. There comes a moment where you say ok, now I either get something working, or I get back to having a life... Oh, and I agree with what you said in your last paragraph, I'm well aware, when I meant change the world I meant from the bottom up...


@Whatisit:  I hope you can see what I was talking about earlier now that Rick has posted a schematic.


thanks,
Mario

[itsu]

I did some tests looking for sympathetic resonance (sorry for he pronunciation in the video) between 3 new coils setup in line with the big coil.

12.4V on the gate driver, 3700V on the big coil in resonance (180Khz).

The 3 coils in line with the big coil each have a 3W led attached which it lit according to their distance to the big coil.

Changing the distance inbetween the 3 new coils does not influence the last not lit led.
Only when putting the middle coil ontop of the last coil its led comes on dimly.

Not sure this is sympathetic resonance or plain transformer action, i guess the latter.

Video here:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8pl1KxBq90


Itsu

An upfront sorry for the possible off topic and/or boring contents of the next post / video's.

I was trying to dive into this effect i had (see quote) which shows the led going on on the 3th satellite coil
when the 2th coil was ontop of it, NOT when it was close together to it.

I thought that it would be the coupling which could be stronger that way, so i did some tests with 2 of these coils.

First test is with my Spectrum Analyzer and Tracking Generator.
Feeding 1 coil with the TG (sweeping from 9KHz (minimum) to 400KHz (so the 193KHz resonance frequency in the middle)
and "listening" on the other coil with the SA.

The coupling between these 2 coils can be monitored that way.
Video here:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbK8U_CmsJE


Second test was a similar one, now using the FG on one coil (sweeping) and the scope on the both.
The screenshot below shows the overcoupled situation (yellow the driven coil, blue the receiving coil.)
Video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jI6JszIDG4Q


It seems that we both overcouple the coils in a similar way, so no or very little difference in coupling strength
when putting the both coils side by side or ontop of each other.

So why the led on the 3th coil in the quoted setup did light up only when the 2th coil was ontop is still unanswered to me.


Next i will try to follow Gyula's comment to see if the top coil receives more power because of its elevated position.


Itsu