Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[itsu]

Thanks ITSU for your efforts.
I'm hoping that you will use resistances instead of LED's in this coming test.
If you are using the satellite coils as before in parallel resonance it is obvious that these in the resonance situation are best conformed wih high Ohm resistors or anyhow with other very HIGH Ohmic loads as they go extremely high Ohmic then.
A parallel resonance circuit loaded with LED's will only be "clamped" mismatched and the Q-value totally destroyd.
You can also then skip the FRB's.
[[ Maybe a high Ohmic (load)resistor before two in opposite direction LED's is maybe a choice that also gives a visual option. ]]

Regards Arne

seaad,

well, for the loopback test i would not need any leds nor resistors, just feed back the DC into the supercap.

A question which is not being answered yet is whether or not the satellite coils need to be in either parallel
or series resonance.

I have hinted a few times that i now use parallel for the satellites (series for the big coil), because of the
better impedance match, but nobody has specifically corrected me that i should use one or the other.

Perhaps A.king21 can shed some light on that.


Thanks,   Itsu.

[gyulasun]

Hi Itsu,
My understanding from Rick's video and posts is that in his RX LC circuits the coil is in parallel with the tuning capacitor.
So they are all parallel resonant LC circuits and directly drive the LED bulbs or individual small LEDs. 

Gyula

[endlessoceans]

I don't know, it is something I have wondered for a long time. Are they all liars Tesla, Morray, Newman, Meyers, Searl, Wagner, Hans Coeler a......

Just depends what you think they were lying about.  You see.....and listen carefully here.....if you read their patents VERY carefully (and they were very well worded!!) there is NOTHING in them that indicates OU.  NOTHING

But people love to read into things especially when the mind feverishly wishes for a dream.  Tesla talked about millions of horsepower and power generated but after all those years he was still hooked to the grid.  For ALL his experiments he was hooked to mains town supply. 

As far as the other inventors go, many were working with exotic materials such a radium or other isotopes.  Searl is an old buffoon who tried all sorts of magnetic motors and told fanciful stories of his one working motor which lost gravity and shot intp the atmosphere never to be seen again  LOOOOL    .   He should go to prison for that nonsense.  Newman still worked with big batteries and took thousand's of dollars in investors money  Also jail worthy.  Moray was a true scientist but also worked with exotic materials and never disclosed the contents of his tube.  Many other inventors are often associated with OU sites but the fact is their patents did not state OU.  People see what they want to see


SOME of those patents had Terms such as "self sustaining" that Rick Friedrich grabs onto.......but that does not mean OU.  Self sustaining .......for how long???  Huh.  A flashlight is self sustaining.  A rechargeable power tool that does not need to be plugged into the wall is self sustaining but for how long?  By the true definition of the term....a vehicle is self sustaining because you can fill the tank and drive 400 mile......    None of those patents said or even alluded to INFINITE self sustaining.   Yes...energy is never destroyed but it is converted into heat and light and all sort and that conversion costs you something.   


These stories about coils cooling to freezing and cold lightbulbs are nonsense.  Even large halogen loads which you run off a tesla hairpin that you can dunk into water without getting electrocuted are scalding hot on the glass....why?? because there is resistance at the filament in order to generate heat and light.


Tesla was a brilliant man and his patents on one wire transmission were cutting edge.   Rick....

You have pretty big capacity batteries with lEDS that hooked a certain way can run for days.    Your batteries are a still dropping down after all that cycling.  I find it amusing that on one hand you say that NOTHING can be proven on the internet and yet that's the very thing you attempt to do.   BTW saying that nothing can be proven on the internet is rubbish.  You sit there and conduct some very good demonstrations (yes that's a compliment) and draw some accurate conclusions and yet on the other hand when somebody asks you to take all these little black boxes and show 3 batteries being charged for the price of one or a output looped back to the source you come up with the laughable "Im sorry but nothing can be proven on the internet and btw this circuit is not perfectly tuned.    .  "back in my last seminar I showed it running perpetually blah blah blah and thousands have OU!!.  You yourself said Bedini was a liar and misled people and yet you are no different. 

You know what...Don Smith said exactly the same thing over and over and yet the few guys that took a measurement to his device always showed it as slowly running down.

You may think I am angry or a paid shill (which is laughable) but I am not the one making massive claims and keeping people on the carrot stick for how many decades now??

Oh and btw....mixing what the Bible says with your kit selling is just plain mentally ill.  Are you trying to run a church or sell a charger?  Jesus himself threw out the money changers from the temple because the things of the flesh have nothing to do with the things of the spirit.  So if you want to start a church then go do that but please read the Bible first before prostituting it.

[seaad]

Itsu,
I think you comes into a situation where the super caps acts more or less as a shortcut also (extremely low impedance, as LEDs) when loading them.
My advise is to introduce some type of buck- converter in between the secondary coils [the gathered (high) DC voltages] and the  super cap.
These buck- converters can be made to have a very high efficiency ( >95%).

Regards Arne

[rickfriedrich]

Void of truth, yeah that is my point. This is 90-95% psychological. People lie to themselves and others on both sides. Some people want to believe they have something when they don't, and other people convince themselves that something can't happen when it can.
I don't expect you to believe anything I say, just like I have no reason to believe anything a nameless person I have never met says. Such comments have no benefit here and are just wasted space. Just more diversion.
The fact is that everyone believes that millions of people have free energy solar and wind and other means. Solar would have been considered impossible over 100 years ago. Same kind of ridicule would have been hurled at people. I said what I said because it is a fact that many people use the technology in various ways. You assume that people would go online and tell everyone what they have, but that is false. In fact a good number of people have shared things online and you guys don't pay attention to that.

So many liars and delusionals in this world. Very sad.