Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[forest]

C'mon this thread is going nowhere.
Here is what you guys should concentrate :1. Can we use resonant circuit like Tesla did to impress as much power on antenna ?2. Can the power radiated from antenna be larger then the input power to the tank circuit ?3. Can the antenna be loaded with resistive load ?4. Can the antenna output be directed to that resistive load and converted to work ?The end is the radio transmitter with the output converted to heat for example !

[rickfriedrich]

Well I wrote out a response but when I tried to upload a picture it deleted my post. So I'll just say, reread what I wrote already. I use meters like everyone else. On the boat, etc. I'll post boat details on the new website showing that I first did my forklift motor from my Honda EV conversion where I installed it and ran it with the Curtis controller at max 350A @ 132V golf cart batteries to maintain 7MPH, then replaced that with my system, yes another window motor on the water AG. I never ran it more than 24V off the same batteries, and at 50A I was driving it around 5MPH. It was a 10,000 pound 1979 boat. Always had meters on it, and just rotated it around. Didn't do anything special to show everyone that even the basic system was practical. So on efficiency I was doing much better than regular systems. No power consumption I had zero for three years. Also for a few years before that when it was in the rider lawnmower.

I use oscopes for many reasons and measuring complex waveforms results in complex discussions. That's my opinion. I have already answered the limitations of trying to measure non-existent current processes to try and conclude nothing substantial is happening. The scope and probe become their own loop in a circular argument of sorts. However, limited measurements can be made and software can and does predict nonlinear reactive processes. So once you learn that you can create endless free energy systems...

Rick,
Thanks for your reply but how do you measure work done. For example how did you determine that your big electric boat was running OU and what instrumentation did you use?

What is your opinion on the use of oscilloscopes for measuring pulsed and complex waveforms?

[rickfriedrich]

That's right, but you don't have to do such an involved system to experience OU. You guys just latched on to this and missed the intention of my kit because you were just guessing about it.

So if you are going to do a circuit like Tesla did, then you have to actually read Tesla and do what he did. I don't see that hardly at all. You are going to have to not miss one detail from his lectures and patents. There is little evidence that people are paying attention to his details. Those details are part of the principles of free energy. Tesla said certain things were a must while most people ignore such comments and make something different. For example, do they just have a spark gap without going to the meticulous detail of perfecting it with proper magnetic quenching? Why is that important, isn't just a matter of pulsing? No, Tesla emphatically taught on the importance of a fast rate of change and that the faster the better. This is a principle mostly ignored. While cutting short the arc is more efficient, he is not so concerned with that as much as who the gains are from the fastest rates of change. He gave a lot of detail along those lines and that was fundamental to understanding his one wire system and even the so-called Hairpin circuit.

So you can't even begin to do Tesla without understanding what he was doing and why the details mattered. I'm not directing this at you Forest in saying all this, just speaking in general. We are looking for a very sharp impulse. Secondly, a resonance circuit properly done. Thirdly with proper grounding, and understanding fully what that means. Fourthly, proper L1 L2 relationships. Fifthly quarter wavelengths. Now read the details, sometimes only said once, and you can expect the same results. This will actually show you not to do the power transmission system he patented. It will just take you back to an easier way to experience OU. Follow what he said about one wire systems and the fast rate of impulsing and you will get what you are looking for without needing wireless. This I have long said and demonstrated for years.

As for radio systems you want a loosely coupled L1/L2 where the secondary is independent of the primary. You only want a situation where the primary is not affected by the secondary(s). This is the same as the Don Smith Effect where the primary side of the capacitor is not affected or dampened by the secondary side. So it is unlike a phase lock loop tesla coil that tracks the secondary and adjusts the primary. Or at least any L3 coil from that point on is not hard linked to the L2/L1 system. What you are after is what I mentioned the other day, and it is not what people are looking for. This is why I set up my kit to help people learn this on a very small scale. So when you do this, this results, but when you do that, something different happens. Itsu was starting to see some of that. There is a lot more going on in the near field then people realize. But ultimately you won't be fooling around with satellite coils (well that is not true as the whole world is rapidly moving in that way with rectenna tech taking over soon) but will be doing Tesla L1/L2 coils which will multiply the energy. You just have to learn the difference between the two different types of coupling while never loading down the primary...

C'mon this thread is going nowhere.
Here is what you guys should concentrate :1. Can we use resonant circuit like Tesla did to impress as much power on antenna ?2. Can the power radiated from antenna be larger then the input power to the tank circuit ?3. Can the antenna be loaded with resistive load ?4. Can the antenna output be directed to that resistive load and converted to work ?The end is the radio transmitter with the output converted to heat for example !

[Hoppy]

Well I wrote out a response but when I tried to upload a picture it deleted my post. So I'll just say, reread what I wrote already. I use meters like everyone else. On the boat, etc. I'll post boat details on the new website showing that I first did my forklift motor from my Honda EV conversion where I installed it and ran it with the Curtis controller at max 350A @ 132V golf cart batteries to maintain 7MPH, then replaced that with my system, yes another window motor on the water AG. I never ran it more than 24V off the same batteries, and at 50A I was driving it around 5MPH. It was a 10,000 pound 1979 boat. Always had meters on it, and just rotated it around. Didn't do anything special to show everyone that even the basic system was practical. So on efficiency I was doing much better than regular systems. On power consumption I had zero for three years. Also for a few years before that when it was in the rider lawnmower.

I use oscopes for many reasons and measuring complex waveforms results in complex discussions. That's my opinion. I have already answered the limitations of trying to measure non-existent current processes to try and conclude nothing substantial is happening. The scope and probe become their own loop in a circular argument of sorts. However, limited measurements can be made and software can and does predict nonlinear reactive processes. So once you learn that you can create endless free energy systems...

Thanks Rick. Just two more questions please and I'll leave you in peace:-
Do have a record of the total sailing time over the three years?
Did you ever top up the battery bank(s) and if so, how frequently?

[rickfriedrich]

No.
"No power consumption I had zero for three years."
[Must be too tired to notice, I had typed "On" instead of "No". Then I had the nerve to quote it as it has said "No".  ]

Thanks Rick. Just two more questions please and I'll leave you in peace:-
Do have a record of the total sailing time over the three years?
Did you ever top up the battery bank(s) and if so, how frequently?