Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[nelsonrochaa]

   
   Nelson:  Can you please explain (again), the difference between your circuit, and a simple Exciter/Kacher circuit?
   I am still very interested in your circuit(s), if that particular circuit can self run, or produce OU.

Hi Nick, I hope you're well.
I respect you Nick but i will not make the mistake once made in the past, fueling controversy, and I unlike some people i
do not need to be the center of attention .
That circuit is part of something bigger , where i invest 2 years of my time study him but is only a model of study not scaled .
On this old video you could see 1 test with on of "radiant" module tests.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Is9fOtBeo_I

More scaled up https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGdKqdpztuY            look to the glass of water on the top of flat pancake coil

Wish you all the best

[a.king21]

Chet: quote from Wesley.


Dr Hans is good man, but he has temptations and  moods.[/size]and I respect thatAs far as me. : I DON"T CARE..That is one of the reasons I didn't publish yet  book  for housewives   how to  put together   shelf from IKEA and how to  build FE  device  based   on  Schumann waveguide.Wesley

[ramset]

Wesley has great zeal and passion for this path he investigates I have absolutely Zero knowledge beyond his postings at this forum.
I had read a while back in his note book he was looking for or wondering why persons were not experimenting with this/his technology ?
very recently there have been discussions towards remedying this drought?
maybe he will open a separate page in his section if this happens ?
that is to say persons with the skill set and equipment and history of sharing
here or elsewhere !
show interest..................would not surprise me if Wesley even offered to loan some things towards this goal [he is that kind of guy !!
??nothing ventured nothing gained........??

[Void]

Hi Ramset. If Joel agrees to do a demo (he apparently has previously), then it doesn't have to
be too over the top. If the person going there is too demanding or intimidating, he might not agree to a demo.
For a first visit, a person viewing just needs to:
1) Be able to make sure there are no hidden mains wires being used to power the loads by checking carefully around the device
    and loads for possible hidden wires.
2) Make sure there is no large battery inside powering an inverter. Can do this by powering
    a load of about 1kW for several hours continuously.
Keep it friendly and easy going and he may agree to do the demo.
If someone approaches him with all sorts of over the top demands, then he may well not agree.

[rickfriedrich]

T,
Face it, you accused me of not reading your post in my reply, but I did and you actually didn't in the very reply. Just like Void. Now you look even worse for shifting your rebuke. You specifically described Void's meters I showed exploded, so you mocked him while trying to mock me. You have no credibility here, and you are not providing any valuable content. Only being a bully as one just pointed out. 

I am not relying on a panel meters for my claims T. I do use all the meters available, and also the ultimate KW meter that is on the side of your house as I show at my meetings. My claims are about what is happening in the real world.

It is obvious that you DO CARE what I say, otherwise you would not go to such lengths to make a fool of yourself. You are desperate to do this at any cost apparently.

I didn't demonstrate anything on this forum but my claims about truths you all have proved to and in yourselves now. It is you who have all proved the only claims I intended to prove through the internet. I proved that: It is foolish to assume you can prove or disprove OU through video, pictures or words over the Internet. I proved that people like you contradict themselves and purposely try and suppress what I have been sharing. The intense energy fired up about a mere information exchange proves to everyone that the mocking words are not actually sincere and that there is a manifest agenda here. The amount of traffic alone that has come to this thread since I joined it last month is very telling that the information is valuable. You and several others speak as if it is not, but the volume and fallacy of your responses prove to everyone otherwise.

Just imagine what that energy could do if you sincerely wanted to do good with it. So far I have proven several fundamental things to these two forums, what have you proven? Seems nobody wanted to even consider that you can't prove or disprove OU over the Internet. Now that seems self-evident, but why have all of you and tens of thousands of people not considered that all these years? So much wasted energy as some of you have admitted. I think that what I did in that respect is very significant even if you disagree with everything else. But no, you are bent on attack. And you don't want to grant that because it exposes your game and great fallacy. I have brought the actual purpose of these forums back to your faces and rebuked the folly of trying to make this and all forums into some heresy hunting inquisition. And I have repeatedly stated that we have to start with a proper foundation or there can be no progress. But you and others keep denying that foundation and beg the question by expecting proof over the internet directly or implied. You are all bent out of shape over it. I take a picture outside of a racoon up a tree and post it on a forum. Any you jump up an down saying it doesn't prove it is a raccoon because you think it is a cat. You mock me because you assume there are no raccoons in this area, and besides that I didn't have the proper lens on my camera to prove it to you! But I never intended to prove to you that it was a racoon with a picture or over the internet. I merely shared something with a picture to strangers because I thought they may be interested. Now I could share that actual picture but somehow I don't think I would get the same response.

You're the one relying on the PSU panel meters for your claims Rick, we've all seen you do it. Void is simply illustrating how they work and how imprecise they can be.   
And I don't care what you say... I care what you DEMONSTRATE, and your PHOTO to which I referred in my comment DEMONSTRATES a bunch of coils without visible loads and a few measly LEDs lit to a dim glow, with sufficient power INPUT to your system fully to account what you DEMONSTRATE. It also DEMONSTRATES that you have a lot more coils and LEDs that you want people to think you "could" have connected.

If that's your OU.... you are being laughed at, by a lot more people than just me. You are being laughed at by the real builders and experimenters on at least two forums.  I can put a bucket out in my yard and catch water from my sprinkler system. The bucket fills up, and I can even put a dozen more buckets out there and they will all fill up, and without putting any additional load on my sprinklers.  That is all you are doing with your "OU".

Demonstrate the validity of your claims. Or admit that you cannot. Think about what Chet has told you, and search deeply within your soul, and ask yourself.... "Is that right?"