Confirmation of OU devices and claims

[baudirenergie]

..again the subject of the Energy Audit here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0pWApv7jdk&t=1s

I have done this yesterday and it works exactly as Rick shown. I never tried this setup before with the complete conventional fan ciruit in it (only self triggering setups).
I have identical results: Air Flow is the same, my power consuption is slightly lower, but I have also another output to load secondary batteries for free!

would be amazing to see this .... Hopefully Stefan's friend will share ....or someone else here.

Why you are waiting for someone. DO IT FOR YOURSELF, START AND MOVING ONE DIODE!!!

[ramset]

baudirenergie if you could post a pic of your settup which motor and how its wired and which battery you are using Plus your extra output [extra energy how much ?]
If not... no worries .

[rickfriedrich]

Everyone,
I didn't realize that I had had a good long talk with Chet over 2 months ago before getting on here or OUR. Phone is always better than online. In person is best. So I think the call went well and we will probably talk in a few days again about where to go from here.

The point to mention is that this was the same Orlando Lab that I have dealt with very positively. They did already share with me their experience with using my older big kits to continuously power loads freely as I mentioned a few months back in the one video. They came out to my big meetings prior to that. Now all this was private and I don't disclose private persons. Needless to say, then the Lab has already proven this technology and my claims. While we have been friendly, I just mentioned that I told them that I would not do any joint projects together with them because of the fact that one of them was former Lockheed. But I have shared a lot of information with them and there was no hostilities between us. There are many other Labs that are much bigger and prestigious that have done the same. It's kind of ironic that this turned out to be a case in point. It doesn't really matter if any or how many Labs have confirmed such thing as everyone has to prove such matters out to themselves as I wrote all along. These guys used the one unit to power all of their electrical needs while they were building a house at one point. Other people sailed around the world in the same way. Many others charge some batteries while they run some fans, etc., etc., etc. The information has long been shared for many years now. I'm organizing it in a careful way on a website this summer.

In doing that I am focusing on some principles of free energy to look carefully at the exact context. It is important also understand what we are talking about, why things have progressed the way they have, and how free energy works. We need to start with the very basic systems and progress from there. This is developing the science of free energy.

(One point to add here. These guys wanted more than a battery and/or motor free energy system. And that is understandable. That is what happened after about three years on the forums in those early years. We had the same kind of debates as we have had here over the last 2 months. In the end I answered every question and the skeptics just wanted more free energy. The demands just changed. So all this is old news that has been long settled. The technology has been long confirmed and the issue was doing it easier. So that is why I have given a lot more information on how to do that. I started way back then in showing how you could get more than just 1 to 1 with motors. So you can understand why I have written the way I have here.)

Sorry I could not talk last night , Thought your "OK" response meant we would talk prior to more postings... at 5:30 this AM I noticed you posted [was surprised] and wanted to Talk priorto making a fresh post [or bumping the thread ] went to the last post I made to leave a Note there for you to read [I do this often to not just keep Bumping the topic with more info or posts.]But this forum has a time limit and that option stops and you can no longer Post.
So I just posted......as always from my heart.  One thing I want to say,the fellow who volunteers at that lab and helps..is just an older [87 years young] retired engineer living in Florida on his pension..I understand after talking to you that you feel uncomfortable with someone with a past in the military sector [his higher classification or experience] ,but I don't want persons to think that Lab is connected in anyway to such a past ,the owner did also let QEG [Morocco Hope girl] have full access to the lab when they were supposedly sharing with the world,but removed them when it became apparent there were issues with the claim.For many years they have helped test ideas and do experiments .IMO a great asset and anyone who carries water for this open source cause is a friend .

We shall see what the future brings here regarding the Gain mechanism mentioned in your Video and on the phone [again]
looking forward to that,...I personally feel there is much confusion around this and has been for many years ,would be amazing to see this .... Hopefully Stefan's friend will share ....or someone else here.

Was good to talk again ,Chet K


.

[rickfriedrich]

Hey B, very good to hear.

I started showing that very simple setup 3 or 4 years ago because it was very easy to do. I realize that is what people want, something simple, even if it isn't a lot of extra energy. People want shorter and easier rather than longer and involved. Everything has to be in 5 minutes or it is an irritation I guess. This also gives a more controlled experiment as you can have the exact same operation (startup and same CFMs) whereas the trigger coil versions, while having better output, are not self-starting (but they do have adjustable speeds and can rotate in either direction).

I expected the kind of responses from people that were given and that was why I didn't bother to show the part number and inside as I had in the first video of this (but I said you can do this with all the fans). I only did this video for people who are open to it. Those who want it to be nothing will just call it more efficient. Well it is more efficient but more than that. If we even forget the 'more than that' in battery charging, is making the input more efficient not an important thing for billions of fans in existence? It's rather amazing that billions of fans have been made to be significantly less efficient than they could be and that some bozo like me who doesn't know anything at all was able to make one simple change to do this. But if we also consider that a battery can be charged, or other load powered, then we realize WHY this is not being done. This implies something much more significant than mere efficiency gains. This is something industry does not want to be known. It changes everything. Well not all industry because thousands of people have been doing this for the last 14 years. Soon people will believe in machine flight when they see in the real world objects with fans on them flying over their heads. Oops, that was over 110 years ago!

Anyway, that is what this thread and forum is for. People share information in video, pictures, words and others try it in the real world. It doesn't take a Lab or EE to prove that it makes a difference.

I have done this yesterday and it works exactly as Rick shown. I never tried this setup before with the complete conventional fan ciruit in it (only self triggering setups).
I have identical results: Air Flow is the same, my power consuption is slightly lower, but I have also another output to load secondary batteries for free! Why you are waiting for someone. DO IT FOR YOURSELF, START AND MOVING ONE DIODE!!!

[poynt99]

Referring to the attached pic from Rick's brushless DC fan video, and the one baudirenergie replicated, I have a question:


From the perspective of the person conducting this experiment, what signs should they be looking for to indicate that the experiment is a success?


I have no issue nor argument about the identical fan output in both circuit configurations, as that is obvious from the schematic. What I do question is whether including the second battery in the flyback loop (and its charging effect) constitutes experimental proof of overunity.


In the first scenario (left circuit configuration), the unused energy stored in the motor coil is burned off in the flyback diode and the winding resistance of the motor coil. In the second scenario (right circuit configuration), the unused energy stored in the motor coil is burned off in the diode, the battery, and the winding resistance of the motor coil.


Unless there is some heretofore unknown "process" that takes place inside the battery due to the pulses that super-potentializes it (or something), there is no OU effect taking place with this circuit configuration.


So I ask my question above; how does one "know" when they have hit success with this experiment?


And as an aside Rick, I want to address the fact that you have called me a liar here in at least one post. Although there is always the possibility that I am wrong that this circuit configuration (or any variant of it) does not produce overunity (which I doubt), I most certainly have not lied with that assertion; I have no reason to.