How We Should Approach And Proceed With Building Replications

[Magluvin]

No.
I think that most important (and often forgotten) precondition for successful replication... is that replicator understands how device works . Without understanding even very close copy most probably will not work

Thanks for the opinion.

If it is an OU claim, and your replication is not as close as possible, and then you do not get OU results, then I have to say your results cannot be 100% conclusive as to debunk the claim. Like why would you wish to go on your own interpretation? If one is serious about going after the possibility of OU, of which would be a very important discovery, what reasons would one have to not build as close as possible when you are going to go through the trouble of the build in the first place, if your real goal is to possibly see and OU device sit and work on the bench in front of you?

Heck, you can build 100 variants and not see anything, when 'maybe' if you had gone the direct route, then you may have not had to build all those variants.

I just find it strange that some insist on not building an accurate as possible replication when it comes to the search for the ever elusive OU claims.

Like you say " is that replicator understands how device works ".  Really?  How does the Kapanadze work?  How does the Bedini V2 work? Why does Bedini use magnets all N out? Do you think NSNSNS is better??? Etc, etc.

Mags

[Magluvin]

vasik041


100% agree. You are on the good path.

Really Forest?  Well which ou devices or claims do you know how they actually work to get OU? Please share. If not, then what are you really saying?

Mags

[profitis]

"Heck, you can build 1000 variants and see
something, when 'maybe"

When maybe you connect the dots of principal

[Jeg]

Without knowledge in that field yes however if the guy has a precise manual for building from scratch then it shouldn't be hard,especially for simple devices

Sounds true. But experimenter's understanding and experience to the involved topic/device/principal theory is what counts at the end. The same simple circuit will lead to different conclusions to different experimenters and thus to different results. My point is that if 5 persons look at the same circuit, each one of them will recognize only what he is ready to recognize. And this readiness depend only to his experience.

Building a replication is not the best term. Making an attempt to replicate is better.
Regards

[forest]

"A DEPARTURE FROM KNOWN METHODS—POSSIBILITY OF A "SELF-ACTING " ENGINE OR MACHINE, INANIMATE, YET CAPABLE, LIKE A LIVING BEING, OF DERIVING ENERGY PROM THE MEDIUM—THE IDEAL WAY OF OBTAINING MOTIVE POWER"